Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The United Nations Special Representative on Transnational Corporations and Human Rights, John Ruggie, has adopted a new framework for considering this issue within the international legal system. This article examines this framework in terms of its coherence, its consistency with international human rights law and how it can be ‘operationalized’ (which is required by the United Nations). In regard to the states legal obligation to protect human rights, it is considered whether this obligation is broader and deeper than is envisaged in the framework, especially if it can include the extra-territorial activities of corporations. The corporate responsibility to respect human rights is examined in terms of its conceptual and definitional problems, and the article also questions whether there will be sufficient legal remedies available to victims under the framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bingham, T.: 2007, The Rule of Law. Cambridge Law Journal 66:67-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business for Social Responsibility: 2007, available at http://www.bsr.org/resourcecenter.

  • CESCR General Comment 13: UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment No. 13 on the Right to Education

  • Colopy, J.: 1994/1995, ‘Poisoning the Developing World: The Exportation of Unregistered and Severely Restricted Pesticides from the United States’. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 13:167-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomans, F.: 2004, ‘Some Remarks on the Extraterritorial Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’. In F. Coomans and M.T. Kamminga (eds.) Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Intersentia, Antwerp and Oxford, p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., and Moon, J.: 2008, Corporations and Citizenship (CUP, Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J.: 2002, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (CUP, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrow, M.: 2003, Between Light and Shadow, The World Bank, The International Monetary Fund and International Human Rights Law (Hart, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deva, S.: 2004, ‘Acting Extraterritorially to Tame Multinational Corporations for Human Rights Violations: Who Should “Bell the Cat”?’, Melbourne JIL 5, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dine, J.: 2000, The Governance of Corporate Groups (CUP, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dine, J.: 2005, Companies, International Trade and Human Rights (CUP, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, H.: 2006, ‘Towards Global Responsibility for Human Rights Protection: A Sketch of International Developments’, Interights Bulletin 15, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC Norms: 2003, ‘United Nations Economic & Social Council, Sub-Commission on Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’, U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2 (26 August, 2003)

  • Eisenberg, M.: 1997, `The World of Contract and the World of Gift` California LR 85, 821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S.: 1995, ‘Lack of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction over Civilians: A New Look at an Old Problem’, Military Law Review 148, 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, R., et al.: 1995, ‘Greening or Greenwashing?: The Evolution of Industry Decision Making’, in R. Gottlieb (ed.), Reducing Toxics: A New Approach to Policy and Industrial Decision Making (PPERC)

  • ICC (International Chamber of Commerce): 2009, ‘Joint Views of the International Chamber of Commerce and the International Organisation of Employers to the 8th session of the Human Rights Council of the [Ruggie Report]’, available at www.ioe-emp.org.

  • ILC (International Law Commission): 2001, ‘Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’, Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its 53nd Session, A/56/10, August 2001, UN GAOR. 56th Sess. Supp. No. 10, UN Doc A/56/10(SUPP)

  • Independent Inquiry Committee into the UN Oil-for-Food Programme: 2005, ‘Final Report (“Manipulation of the Oil-for-Food Programme by the Iraqi Regime”)’, at http://www.iic-offp.org/documents/IIC%20Final%20Report%2027Oct2005.pdf.

  • International Commission of Jurists (ICJ): 2008, Corporate Complicity and Legal Accountability (ICJ)

  • Jones, O.R.: 2009, “Implausible Deniability: State Responsibility for the Actions of Private Military Firms” Connecticut Journal of International Law 24, 239–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S.: 2004, Corporations and Transnational Human Rights Litigation (Hart, Oxford and Portland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S., Schultz, J. and Castan, M.: 2004, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Commentary and Materials, 2nd edition, (OUP, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi: 2005, ‘Governance Matters’, http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance.

  • Mann, F. A.: 1985, ‘The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited After Twenty Years’, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht)

  • McBeth, A. and Joseph, S.: 2005, ‘Same Words, Different Language: Corporate Perceptions of Human Rights Responsibilities’, Australian Journal of Human Rights, 11, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorquodale, R and La Forgia, R.: 2001, ‘Taking Off the Blindfolds: Torture by Non-State Actors’, Human Rights Law Review 1, 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorquodale, R and Simons, P: 2007, ‘Responsibility beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law’, Modern Law Review 70, 598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeran, R.: 1999, ‘The Unveiling of Transnational Corporations: A Direct Approach’ in M Addo (ed), Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations (Kluwer, The Hague) 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgera, E.: 2009, Corporate Accountability in International Environmental Law (OUP, New York).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD: 2000, ‘The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises’, in OECD (ed.), OECD Declaration and Decisions on International Investment and Multinational Enterprises: Basic Texts (DAFFE/IME)

  • OECD Risk Awareness Tools: 2006, ‘Risk Awareness Tools for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones’, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/26/21/36885821.pdf.

  • Ripinsky, S: 2008, Damages in International Investment Law (BIICL, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.: 2007, ‘Mapping International Standards of Responsibility and Accountability for Corporate Acts’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General On the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprise, UN Doc A/HRC/4/35

  • Ruggie, J.: 2008, ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights’, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, U.N. Doc A/HRC/8/5 (7 April 2008)

  • Ruggie, J: 2009, Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, UN Doc A/HRC/11/13

  • Schmitt, M.: 2005, ‘Humanitarian Law and Direct Participation in Hostilities by Private Contractors or Civilian Employees’. Chicago JIL, 5:511

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C.: 2001, (ed.) Torture as Tort (Hart, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, D.: 2006, ‘Collective Responsibility, Corporate Responsibility and Moral Taint’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30, 269–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Sornarajah, M.: 2001, Linking State Responsibility for Certain Harms Caused by Corporate Nationals Abroad to Civil Recourse in the Legal Systems of Home States. In: C. Scott (ed.), Torture as Tort. Hart, Oxford, p. 491

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2005/69 (20 April 2005) UN Doc E/CN.4/2005/L.10/Add.17

  • UNCTAD: 2006, World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D (UN, New York and Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Council Resolution 8/7 (2008), 18 June 2008

  • Vienna Declaration 1993: UN World Conference on Human Rights: 1993, ‘Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action’, International Legal Materials 32, 1661

  • Ward, H.: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Law and Policy’ in N. Boeger, R. Murray and C. Villiers (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, (Edward Elgar), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organisation) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: 2003, available at http://www.who.int/fctc.

Download references

Acknowledgements

My thanks to Ndanga Kamau for all her invaluable research and Oliver R. Jones for his research, insights and editing skills.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert McCorquodale.

Additional information

This article is a revised version of an address given at the Nottingham University Business School’s symposium on ‘Spheres of Influence/Spheres of Responsibility: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights’, held in November 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCorquodale, R. Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law. J Bus Ethics 87 (Suppl 2), 385–400 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0296-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0296-5

Key words

Navigation