Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article develops an “ordonomic” approach to business ethics in the age of globalization. Through the use of a three-tiered conceptual framework that distinguishes between the basic game of antagonistic social cooperation, the meta game of rule-setting, and the meta-meta game of rule-finding discourse, we address three questions, the answers to which we believe are crucial to fostering effective business leadership and corporate social responsibility. First, the purpose of business in society is value creation. Companies have a social mandate to organize mutually advantageous cooperation. Second, business ethics should teach the management competencies necessary to fulfill business’s societal mandate. These competencies are optimization competence in the basic game of value creation, governance competence in the meta game of (political) rule setting, and the three discourse-related skills of orientation competence, reception competence, and communication competence necessary for engaging in the meta-meta game. Third, companies can help solve global problems through global corporate citizenship if they participate as political and moral actors in rule-setting processes and rule-finding discourse aimed at laying the foundation for value creation on a global scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albach H. (2005) ‘Betriebswirtschaftslehre ohne Unternehmensethik’. ZfB – Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftslehre 75(9): 809-831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albach, H. 2007 ‘Betriebswirtschaftslehre ohne Unternehmensethik – Eine Erwiderung’. ZfB – Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftslehre 77(2): 195-206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.: 1985, ‘The economics of agency’, in J. Pratt and R. Zeckhauser (eds.), Principals and agents: The Structure of business, (Harvard University Press, Boston), pp. 37-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J.: forthcoming, ‘The Implications of the New Governance for Corporate Governance’, Paper Prepared for the Conference “Corporate Citizenship and New Governance” in Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany, November 2009

  • Bowie, N. E.:1999. Business ethics: A Kantian perspective, (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N.: 2000: ‘Kantian theory of leadership’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 21(4), 185-193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragues, G.: 2006, ‘Seek the Good Life, not Money: The Aristotelian Approach to Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 67(4), 341-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, J.: 2004, Corporate Citizenship und Public-Private Partnerships: Zum Potential der Kooperation zwischen Privatwirtschaft, Entwicklungszusammenarbeit und Zivilgesellschaft, WZGE-Studien No. 1 (Lutherstadt Wittenberg)

  • Buchanan, J. M., R. D. Tollison and G. Tullock (eds.): 1980), Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, (Texas A & M University Economics Series, College Station).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottmann, T.: 2007, ‘e-mission 55: Flagge zeigen für den Klimaschutz’, in J. Rieksmeier (ed.), Praxisbuch: Politische Interessenvermittlung. Instrumente - Kampagnen - Lobbying, (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden), pp. 196-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, G.: 2006, ‘The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 68(3), 347-361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A. T. and D. C. North: 1994, ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, Kyklos 47(1), 3-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T. W. Dunfee: 1999, Ties that bind: a social contracts approach to business ethics, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W. and T. Donaldson: 1995, ‘Contractarian Business Ethics: Current Status and Next Steps’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(2), 173-186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duska, R. F.: 1993, ‘Aristotle: A Pre-Modern Post-Modern? Implications for Business Ethics, by’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(3), 227-250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigen, P.: 2006, ‘Fighting Corruption in a Global Economy: Transparency Initiatives in the Oil and Gas Industry’, Houston Journal of International Law 29, 327-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, S. J. and D. Scott: 2002, ‘Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The Adidas Connection’, California Management Review 45(1), 29-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom, (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine September 13, 1970, New York, 32–33, 122–126

  • Hardin, G.: 1968, ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science 162, 1243-1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. S.: 2005, Capitalism at the Crossroads: The unlimited business opportunities in solving the world's most difficult problems (Wharton School Publishing, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. S. and London, T.: 2005, ‘Developing native capability: What multinational corporations can learn from the base of the pyramid’, Stanford Social Innovation Review 3(2), 28-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D.: 2001, Misguided Virtue. False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility (New Zealand Business Roundtable, Wellington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D.: 2005, ‘The Role of Business in the World of Today’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17, 30-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiss, S. B.: 2004, ‘Does Corporate Social Responsibility Need Social Capital? The Example of the ‘Sector Model Social Responsibility’ of the ‘Foreign Trade Association of the German Retail Trade (AVE)’, a Public Private Partnership Project’, CSGR Working Paper No. 141/04 (University of Warwick, Coventry)

  • Hollenhorst, T. and C. Johnson: 2005, Tools for Corporate Social Responsibility: Forest Steward Council, (ifPeople, Atlanta).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K.: 2002, ‘Wider die Erosion der Moral durch Moralisieren’, in K. Homann (ed.), Vorteile und Anreize: Zur Grundlegung einer Ethik der Zukunft, (Mohr Siebeck. Tübingen), pp. 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C.: 2002, ‘Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function,’ Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2), 235-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kell, G. and D. Levin: 2003, ‘The Global Compact Network: A Historic Experiment in Learning and Action’, Business and Society Review 108(2), 151-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., R.G. Crawford and A. A. Alchian: 1978, ‘Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process’, Journal of Law and Economics 21 (2), 297-326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M.: 1990, ‘Corporate Culture and Economic Theory’, in J. E. Alt and K. A. Shepsle (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 90-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (Chicago University Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Etang, J.: 1992, ‘A Kantian approach to codes of ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(10), 737-744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Etang, J.: 1995: ‘Ethical corporate social responsibility: A framework for managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 14(2), 125-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1978, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. M.: 1996, ‘Aristotelian virtue and business ethics education’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(8), 827-838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M.: 1965: The Logic of Collective Action, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G. and A. G. Scherer: 2006, ‘Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework’, Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 71-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pies, I., S. Hielscher and M. Beckmann: 2009, ‘Moral Commitments and the Societal Role of Business: An Ordonomic Approach to Corporate Citizenship’, Business Ethics Quarterly 19(3), 375-401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, (Clarendon Prees, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K.: 2004, Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits, (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, (Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1993, Political Liberalism, (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G.: 2001, ‘global_governance.net: The Global Compact as Learning Network’, Global Governance 7, 371-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C.: 1960, The Strategy of Conflict, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2007, ‘Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen From a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1096-1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R.S. and N. E. Bowie: 2002, ‘A Kantian perspective on the characteristics of ethics programmes’, Business Ethics Quarterly 14(2), 275-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C.: 1992, ‘Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelean Approach to Business Ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 317-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C.: 2004, ‘Aristotle, Ethics and Business Organizations’, Organization Studies 25 (6,) 1021-1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H. and A. Löhr: 1996, ‘A Republican Concept of Corporate Ethics’, in Urban, S. (ed.), Europe’s Challenges: Economic Efficiency and Social Solidarity (Gabler: Wiesbaden: Gabler), 21-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, A. K. and A. C. Inkpen: 2004, ‘The Corporate Objective Revisited’, Organization Science 15(3), 350-363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G.: 1989, The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent-Seeking, (Kluwer Academic, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Peter: 2008: Integrative economic ethics: foundations of a civilized market economy, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. v.: 1996, Human Action, (Foundation for Economic Education, Irvington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. v.: 2008): Profit and Loss, (Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, O. F.: 2004, ‘The UN Global Compact: The Challenge and the Promise’, Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4), 755-774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, A.: 2003, ‘The Role of the Global Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments’, Journal of Business Ethics 43(3), 233-237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Law and Economics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Grosse Steinstrasse 73, 06108, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Ingo Pies & Stefan Hielscher

  2. Centre for Sustainability Management, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Scharnhorststrasse 1, 21335, Lueneburg, Germany

    Markus Beckmann

Authors
  1. Ingo Pies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Beckmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Hielscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Beckmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pies, I., Beckmann, M. & Hielscher, S. Value Creation, Management Competencies, and Global Corporate Citizenship: An Ordonomic Approach to Business Ethics in the Age of Globalization. J Bus Ethics 94, 265–278 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0263-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0263-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation