Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constructing Illegitimacy? Cartels and Cartel Agreements in Finnish Business Media from Critical Discursive Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last decade, any questionable or illegal behaviour on the part of businesses has received considerable attention in the media. Using a critical discursive perspective, we here investigate how the media constructs one type of questionable business as illegitimate. Our data draw upon articles dealing with cartels and cartel agreements in Finnish business media covering the five year period 2002–2007. Our contributions are following: We add to the current literature on CSR and national businesses, suggesting that regardless of globalization socio-cultural history plays an important role in constructing the illegitimacy of business practices. We therefore emphasize the importance of media as an arena where social actors construct the social contract between business and society. We further contribute to studies on questionable business by reconstructing a discursive framework used to construct cartels and cartel agreements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multi-level Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, J., Mazza, L.C., & Pedersen, J.S. (2005). The Role of the Mass Media in the Consumption of Management Knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(2), 127–132. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2005.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B.E., & Gibbs, B.W. (1990). The Double-edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert, C., Rey, P., & Kovacic, W.E. (2006). The Impact of Leniency and Whistleblowing Programs on Cartels. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(6), 1241–1266. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M.S., & Near, J.P. (1991). Can Illegal Corporate Behavior be Predicted? An Event History Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 9–36. doi:10.2307/256300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. (1992). Horizontal Collusion and Innovation. The Economic Journal, 102, 129–137. doi:10.2307/2234858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. (1995). ‹Stories of the Storytelling Organization: A Postmodern Analysis of Disney as ‹Tamara-land’. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 997–1035. doi:10.2307/256618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D., M. and G.A. Rosile. (2003). ‹Life Imitates Art: Enron’s Epic and Tragic Narration’. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 85–125. doi:10.1177/0893318903253489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boje, D. G. Rosile, R. Durant and J. Luhmann. (2004). Enron Spectacles: A Critical Dramaturgical Analysis. Organization Studies, 25(5), 751–774. doi:10.1177/0170840604042413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. doi:10.2307/257850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (2002). The International Crisis of Confidence in Organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 145–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, J.M., & Bolotova, Y. (2006). Cartel Overcharges: Survey and Meta-analysis. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 1109–1137. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2004 Business Ethics: A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1973). The Case For and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 312–322. doi:10.2307/255331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. 1992, Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonialization: Developments in Communication and the Politics of Everyday Life (State university of New York press, Albany NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The Legitimatising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures -A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. doi:10.1108/09513570210435852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. 1982, Corporations and Morality (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. 1997, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Oxford, Capstone).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K.D. (1994). Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57–88. doi:10.2307/2393494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer: 2003, Trust in Institutions. 59.1. ZA Study Number 3904. January/February 2003.

  • Fairclough, N. 1995, Media Discourse (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. 2003, Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fear, J.: 2006, Cartels and Competition: Neither Market Nor Hierarchies. HBS Working Paper Series 07-011.

  • Fellman, S. and J. Itkonen: 2008, Domestic Models, International Influences and Outside Pressures – Cartel Legislation in Finland, 1958–1988. Working Paper.

  • Fombrun, C. 1996, Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, T. 1980, The Whole World is Watching (Berkeley, University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J.J. (2004). ‹Collusion, Reputation Damage and Interest In Codes of Conduct: the Case of A Dutch Construction Company’, Business Ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 13, 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schmidpeter, R. (Eds.). 2005, Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Berlin, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G., & Phillips, N. (1999). No Joking Matter: Discursive Struggle in the Canadian Refugee System. Organization Studies, 20(1), 1–24. doi:10.1177/0170840699201001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.E. (2008). Optimal Corporate Leniency Programs. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(2), 215–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helkama, K., & Seppälä, T. 2006, ‹Arvojen muutos Suomessa 1980–2000’, in R. Heiskala and E. Raekallio (eds.), Uusi jako: kuinka Suomesta tuli kilpailukyky-yhteiskunta (pp. 131–155) (Helsinki, Gaudeamus).

    Google Scholar 

  • International competition network: 2006, Drafting and Implementing an Effective Leniency Program. Anti-cartel Enforcement Manual.

  • Iyengar, S. 1991, Is Anyone Responsible? How television Frames Political issues (Chigago, University of Chigago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. doi:10.2307/258852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joutsenvirta, M., & Vaara, E. (2009). Discursive (De)legitimation of a Contested Finnish Greenfield Investment Project in Latin America. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 85–96. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketola, T. (1998). ‹Why Don’t the Oil Companies Clean up Their Act? The Realities of Environmental Planning’. Long Range Planning, 31(1), 108–120. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00097-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenstein, M., & Suslow, Y. (2006). What Determines Cartel Success? Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1), 43–95. doi:10.1257/002205106776162681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, M. 2006, The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger (Princeton: EH.Net Economic History Services).

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, S. (2002). The Discourse of the Middle Ground: Citizen Shell Commits to Sustainable Development. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 313–349. doi:10.1177/0893318902153001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence’. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00585.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ralston, D.A. (2002). ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from Businesses Self-Presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 497–514. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M.R. 1993, Socially Responsible Accounting (London, Chapman and Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‹Implicit’ and ‹Explicit’ CSR - A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, C., & Alvarez, J.L. (2000). Haute Couture and Prêt à Porter: The Popular Press and the Diffusion of Management Practices. Organization Studies, 21, 567–588. doi:10.1177/0170840600213004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., & Ahern, K. (2000). The Professional Consequences of Whistleblowing by Nurses. Journal of Professional Nursing, 16(6), 313–321. doi:10.1053/jpnu.2000.18178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility? A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127. doi:10.2307/259398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P., & Micheli, M.P. (1985). Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16. doi:10.1007/BF00382668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD Reviews: 2003, Regulatory Reform Finland: A New Consensus for Change. ISBN 9264102671, i-133 (134).

  • Oinas, P.: 2005, ‹Finland- A Success Story?’, European Planning Studies 13(8), 1227 – 1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ola, K: 2002, ‹An Introduction to Cartels’, in Finnish Competition Authority Yearbook, pp. 51–59.

  • Palazzo, G. and A. Scherer: 2006, ‹Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework’, Journal of Business Ethics 66,71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, T. and V. Rindova: 2003, ‹Media Legitimation Effects in the Market for Initial Public Offerings’, Academy of Management Journal 46(5), 631–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl, M. and R. Wodak: 2001, Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism (London and New York, Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, T. and J. Ling: 2002, ‹Democracy, Economic Wealth and Social Capital: Sorting Out the Causal Connection’, Space and Polity 6, 307-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäffner, C. and P. Porsch: 1993, ‹Meeting the Challenge in the Path to Democracy:Discursive Strategies in Government Declarations in Germany and the Former GDR’, Discourse & Society 4(1), 33-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2007, ‹Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1096-1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, H.: 1988, ‹Risk and Control in Multinational Enterprise: German Businesses in Scandinavia 1918-1939’, Business History Review 62(3), 420-443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S.P.: 1979, ‹A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns’, Academy of Management Review 4(1), 63-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N.: 2007, ‹Persuasion with Case Studies’, Academy of Management Journal 50(1), 20-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable society index, 2008, http://www.sustainablesocietyindex.com/pressrelease_ssi2008.pdf.

  • Swanson, D.L.: 1995, ‹Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 43-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency international: 2006–2008, ‹Global Corruption Reports’, http://www.transparency.org/publications/gcr. Checked 28 Feb 2009.

  • Vaara, E.: 2002, ‹On the Discursive Construction of Success/Failure in Narratives of Post-Merger Integration’, Organization Studies 23(2), 213-250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E. and J. Tienari: 2002, ‹Justification, Legitimization and Naturalization of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Media Texts’, Organization 9(2), 275-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E. and J. Tienari: 2008, ‹A Discursive Perspective on Legitimation Strategies in Multinational Corporations’, Academy of Management Review 33(4), 985-993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., J. Tienari and J. Laurila: 2006, ‹Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring’, Organization Studies 27(6), 789-810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T.: 1993, ‹Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis’, Discourse and Society 4(2), 249-283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk T. A.: 1998, Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T.: 2007, ‹Legitimation in Discourse and Communication’, Discourse and Communication 1(1), 91-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, T. and R. Wodak: 1999, ‹Legitimizing Immigration Control; A Discourse-Historical Analysis’, Discourse Studies 1(1), 83-118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S.L. and P.L. Cochran: 1985, ‹The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model’. Academy of Management Review 10(4), 758-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D.: 2001 The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility’. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 9(3), 225-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R.: 2001, ‹The Discourse-historical Approach’, in R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94) (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. and M. Meyer (Eds.): 2001, Methods of critical discourse analysis, (London, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.J.: 1991, ‹Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16, 691–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum reports: 2005–2009, http://www.weforum.org/en/initiatives/gcp/Global%20Competitiveness%20Report/PastReports/index.htm. Checked 28 Feb 2009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Jyväskylä, 1570, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Marjo E. Siltaoja

  2. University of Applied Sciences Haaga-Helia, Helsinki, Finland

    Meri J. Vehkaperä

Authors
  1. Marjo E. Siltaoja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meri J. Vehkaperä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjo E. Siltaoja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siltaoja, M.E., Vehkaperä, M.J. Constructing Illegitimacy? Cartels and Cartel Agreements in Finnish Business Media from Critical Discursive Perspective. J Bus Ethics 92, 493–511 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0169-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0169-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation