Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Moral Reasoning and Retaliation on Whistle-Blowing: New Zealand Evidence

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined experimentally the effect of retaliation strength and accounting students’ level of moral reasoning, on their propensity to blow the whistle (PBW) when faced with a serious wrongdoing. Fifty-one senior accounting students enrolled in an auditing course offered by a large New Zealand university participated in the study. Participants responded to three hypothetical whistle-blowing scenarios and completed an instrument that measured moral reasoning (Welton et al., 1994, Accounting Education. International Journal (Toronto, Ont.) 3(1), 35–50) on one of two conditions – i.e., strong or weak retaliation for whistle-blowing. Consistent with the results of Arnold and Ponemon (1991, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10, 1–15) this study found that the strength of retaliation and participants’ moral reasoning level positively affected their PBW. Unlike results reported in Arnold and Ponemon (1991, Auditing; A Journal of Practice and Theory 10, 1–15) a significant interaction effect of moral reasoning level and retaliation on participants’ PBW was not found. However, results showed that a participant’s gender has a significant effect on the relationship between his or her moral reasoning level and PBW. These results support the need to improve ethical awareness through accounting education and to increase protection for whistle-blowing (Miceli 2004, Journal of Management Inquiry 13, 364–366). Furthermore, many participants found it difficult to take a stand when serious wrongdoing is discovered. Therefore, policymakers must exercise caution when placing heavy reliance on whistle-blowing, especially when whistle-blower protection processes are complex and not easily accessible, and processes to facilitate whistle-blowing may vary substantially between public and private sector organizations (Scholtens, 2003, Review of the operation of the Protected Disclosures Act 2000: Report to the Minister of State Services).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Applebaum, S.H., Grewal, K., & Mousseau, H. (2006). Whistle blowing: International implications and critical case indicators. Journal of American Academy of Business, 10, 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. B.: 1987, ‘Moral Development and Accounting Education’, Journal of Accounting Education (Spring), 27–43. doi:10.1016/0748–5751(87)90036-4

  • Arnold, D, F. and L. A. Ponemon: 1991, ‘Internal Auditors Perceptions of Whistle Blowing and the Influence of Moral Reasoning: An Experiment, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 10, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, S., & Kaplan, S.E. (2005). ‘Wrongdoing by consultants: An examination of employees’ reporting intentions’. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 121–137. doi:10.1007/s10551-004-4600-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. (2004). Organizational Culture: A Framework and Strategies for Facilitating Employee Whistle Blowing. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 16, 1. 10.1023/B:ERRJ.0000017516.40437.b1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. 1980, ‘Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibilities’, in D. Callahan and S. Bok (ed.), Ethics Teaching in Higher Education (Plenum Press, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabeck, M.M. (1984). Ethical characteristics of whistle-blowers. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 41–53. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(84)90037-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. A. and S. C. Selden: 1995, ‘Whistle Blowing in the Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of the Public Service Ethics?’, Revised Version of the Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the America Political Science Association, Chicago, IL

  • Chan, S.Y., & Leung, P. (2006). The effects of accounting students ethical reasoning and personal factors on their ethical sensitivity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 436–457. doi:10.1108/02686900610661432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. and G. M. Cox: 1957, Experimental Designs, Second Edition (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada)

  • Cohen, J. 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, J.B., & Miceli, M.P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle blowing: A prosocial behaviour perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10, 823–836. doi:10.2307/258050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, T.L.N., Conroy, S.J., & Stanley, C.W. (2007). ‘Ethical attitudes of accountants: Recent evidence from a practitioners’ survey’. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 73–87. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9125-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, D. W. and J. Lampe: 1992, ‘A Study of Whistle Blowing Among Auditors’, Professional Ethics (Gainesville, Fla.) 1, 137–168

  • Fisk, J.: 2007, ‘Economic Crime: People Culture & Control. The 4th Biennial Global Economic Crime Survey – New Zealand’, http://www.pwc.com/crimesurvey. Accessed 20 September 2008

  • Frankena, W.K. 1970, ‘The concept of morality’, in G. Wallace and A. D. M. Walker (ed.), The definition of morality (Methuen, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed, G.: 2003, Choosing the Whistle, http://www.whistleblower.org/article.php?did=476&scid=115. Accessed 15 August 2006

  • Gilligan, C. 1982, In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Woman’s Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant Thornton: 2008, ‘Little Support for Whistleblowers Among New Zealand Private Companies’, http://www.grantthornton.co.nz/Press/GTNZ-whistleblowers-release-2008.html. Accessed 20 September 2008

  • Greenberger, D.B., Miceli, M.P., & Cohen, D. (1987). Oppositions and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 527–542. doi:10.1007/BF00383744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, M.J., Douglas, S.C., & Martinko, M.J. (2003). The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 107–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants of New Zealand (ICANZ.presently NZICA): 2003, Improving Corporate Reporting: A Shared Responsibility, Report for the Minister of Commerce (ICANZ, Wellington, New Zealand)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S.E., & Schultz, J.J. (2007). Intentions to report questionable acts: An examination of the influence of anonymous reporting channel, internal audit quality, and setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 109–124. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-0021-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J.P. (1995). Whistleblowing and the First-Level Manager: Determinants of feeling obliged to blow the whistle. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 571–584

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A.: 2007, Protected Disclosures Amendment Bill – First Reading, Parliament of New Zealand, Hansard 642, 12551’, http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Debates/Debates/9/7/c/48HansD_20071018_00000926-Protected-Disclosures-Amendment-Bill-First.htm. Accessed 18 September 2008

  • Mayper, A.G., Pavur, R.J., Merino, B.D., & Hoops, W. (2005). The impact of accounting education on ethical values: An institutional perspective. Accounting and the Public Interest, 5, 32–55. doi:10.2308/api.2005.5.1.32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Whistleblowing in Organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 277–297. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0849-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P. (2004). Whistle-Blowing research and the insider: Lessons learned and yet to be learned. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13, 364–366. doi:10.1177/1056492604270801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P., Dozier, J.B., & Near, J.P. (1991). Blowing the whistle on data-fudging: A controlled field experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(4), 271–295. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00521.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1988, ‘Retaliation Against Role Prescribed Whistle Blowers: The Case of Internal Auditors’, Paper Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA

  • Miceli, M.P., & Near, J.P. (1989). The incidence of wrongdoing, whistle blowing, and retaliation: results of a natural occurring field experiment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 91–108. doi:10.1007/BF01384940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P., & Near, J.P. (1994). Relationships among value congruence, perceived victimization, and retaliation against whistle-blowers. Journal of Management, 20, 773–794. doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90030-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P., Rehg, M., Near, J.P., & Ryan, K.C. (1999). Can laws Protect Whistle-Blowers? Results of a Naturally Occurring Field Experiment. Work and Occupations, 26, 129–151. doi:10.1177/0730888499026001007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P., & Jensen, T.C. (1983). The whistle blowing process: Retaliation and perceived effectiveness. Work and Organisations, 10, 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16. doi:10.1007/BF00382668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. (1986). Retaliation against whistle blowers: Predictors effects. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 137–145. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. (1995). Effective Whistle-blowing. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 679–708. doi:10.2307/258791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. (1996). Whistle-blowing: Myth and reality. Journal of Management, 22(3), 507–526. doi:10.1177/014920639602200306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 2005, ‘Standing Up or Standing By: What Predicts Blowing the Whistle on Organizational Wrongdoing?’, Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 24, University of Illinois, USA

  • Near, J.P., Rehg, M.T., Van Scotter, J.R., & Miceli, M.P. (2004). Does type of wrongdoing affect the whistle-blowing process? Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 219–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P., K. C. Ryan and M. P. Miceli: 1995, ‘Results of a Human Resource Management “Experiment”: Whistle Blowing in the Federal Bureaucracy 1980–1992’, Proceedings of the Academy Management, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 369–373

  • O’Leary, C., & Cotter, D. (2000). The ethics of final year accountancy students: An international comparison. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(3), 108–115. doi:10.1108/02686900010319366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J.: 2005, SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS, 2nd Edition (Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW, Australia

  • Parmerlee, M.A., Near, J.P., & Jensen, T.C. (1982). ‘Correlates of whistle-blowers’ perceptions of organizational retaliation’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 17–34. doi:10.2307/2392544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L., & Gabhart, D. (1990). Auditor independence judgements: A cognitive-development model and experimental evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 7(4), 227–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protected Disclosures Act: 2000, Available Online: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2000/0007/latest/DLM53466.html. Accessed 6 November 2008

  • Pullar-Strecker, T.: 2006, ‘Whistleblower Inquiry: Defence Copier Contract is Alleged to Breach Security Guidelines’, The Dominion Post, August 3

  • Quskas, F., & Kleiner, B. (2001). The difficulties of whistleblowers finding employment. Management Research News, 24(3/4), 97–99. doi:10.1108/01409170110782702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.: 1983, ‘Morality’, in P. H. Mussen (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. III edited by J. Flavell and E. Markman) (Wiley, New York)

  • Rest, J. 1986, Moral Development. Advance in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., & Narvaez, D. 1994, Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Hillsdale, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, E., & Kleiner, B.H. (2005). To blow or not to blow the whistle? That is the question. Management Research News, 28(11/12), 80–87. doi:10.1108/01409170510785264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, M. T.: 2003, Review of the Operation of the Protected Disclosures Act 2000: Report to the Minister of State Services, http://www.beehive.govt.nz/Documents/Files/ACFF62C.pdf. Accessed 26 September 2007

  • Shaub, M., & Lawrence, J. (1996). Ethics, experience, and professional scepticism: a situational analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8(11):124–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R.L., & Keenan, J.P. (1998). Predictors of external whistleblowing: Organizational and intrapersonal variables. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 411–421. doi:10.1023/A:1005763807868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International NZ: 2007, ‘Transparency International NZ media release 26 September 2007’, http://www.transparencynz.org.nz. Accessed 5 April 2008

  • Uddin, N., & Gillett, P.R. (2002). The effects of moral reasoning and self-monitoring on CFO intention to report fraudulently on financial statements. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40(1), 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor, C. (2005). Is this the age of whistleblowers? Strategic Finance, 86(7), 17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Welton, R. E., J. R. Davis and M. LaGrone: 1994, ‘Promoting the Moral Development of Accounting Graduate Students: An Instructional Design and Assessment’, Accounting Education. International Journal (Toronto, Ont.) 3(1), 35–50

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Gregory Liyanarachchi & Chris Newdick

Authors
  1. Gregory Liyanarachchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Newdick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Liyanarachchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liyanarachchi, G., Newdick, C. The Impact of Moral Reasoning and Retaliation on Whistle-Blowing: New Zealand Evidence. J Bus Ethics 89, 37–57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9983-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9983-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation