Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linking Ethics and Risk Management in Taxation: Evidence from an Exploratory Study in Ireland and the UK

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas involving tax issues were identified by members of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants as posing the most difficult ethical problem for them (Finn et al., Journal of Business Ethics 7(8), pp. 607–609, 1988). The KPMG tax shelter fraud case proves that the tax profession has not gone untainted in the age of numerous accounting and corporate scandals, such as the Enron débâcle (Sikka and Hampton, Accounting Forum 29(3), 325–343, 2005). High-profile scandals serve to highlight the problems caused by differences in ethical judgement among accountants and tax practitioners and the issue of ethics has been brought publicly to the forefront of the profession. Nevertheless, the nature and dimension of ethical issues in tax practice have been largely unexplored (Erard, Journal of Public Economics 52(2), 163–197, 1993; Marshall et al., Journal of Business Ethics 17(12), 1265–1279, 1998; Frecknall Hughes, Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Leeds, 2002). This research aims to contribute to the debate on ethics in tax practice by reporting interview data on tax practitioners’ perceptions of ethics in the jurisdictions of Ireland and the United Kingdom and exploring the link or equation of ethics with risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandy D. (1996). Limiting Tax Practice Liability. The CPA Journal, 66(5), 46–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley M., Jenkins J., & Sawyers R. (2006). Brainstorming to Identify and Manage Tax Risks. The Tax Advisor, 37(3), 158–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnes G. A., Harwood G., & Sawyers R. (1996). The Determinants of Tax Professionals’ Aggressiveness in Ambiguous Situations. Advances in Taxation, 8, 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J. (1987). Compliance with the Law. A Decision-Making Approach to Taxpaying. Law and Human Behavior, 11(4), 319–335. doi:10.1007/BF01044744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen J., & Murphy R. (2004). The Social Irresponsibility of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Taking CSR to the Bottom Line. Development, 47(3), 37–44. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1100066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz C. A., Shafer W. E., & Strawser J. R. (2000). A Multidimensional Analysis of Tax Practitioners’ Ethical Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3), 223–244. doi:10.1023/A:1006140809998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dox J. B. 1992. Ethical Issues in the Practice of Tax. In: W. S. Albrecht (ed) Ethical Issues in the Practice of Accounting. South-Western Publishing Co., Ohio, 71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle D. (2001). Risk Management in Tax Practice: Part One. The Irish Tax Review, 14(6), 635–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle D. (2002). Risk Management in Tax Practice: Part 2. The Irish Tax Review, 15(4), 395–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein K. (2004). Negligence Claims Against Tax Advisors. Irish Tax Review, 17(3), 241–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Erard B. (1993). Taxation with Representation: An Analysis of the Role of Tax Practitioners in Tax Compliance. Journal of Public Economics, 52(2), 163–197. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(93)90019-P

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson D. A., Harris E. L., Skipper B. L., & Allen S. D. 1993, Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A. 1988, The Moral Dimension. (Free Press, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn D. W., Chonko L. B., & Hunt S. D. (1988). Ethical Problems in Public Accounting: The View from the Top. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(8), 605–615. doi:10.1007/BF00382793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher A. (1994). Finding the Right Tax Advisor. Fortune, 129(6), 77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis R., & Armstrong A. (2003). Ethics as a Risk Management Strategy: The Australian Experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 375–385. doi:10.1023/A:1024163831371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frecknall Hughes, J.: 2002, ‹An Empirical Investigation of the Share Valuation Work of Taxation Practitioners’, Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Leeds

  • Freedman J. (2004). Defining Taxpayer Responsibility: In Support of a General Anti-Avoidance Principle. British Tax Review, 4, 332–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackenbrack K., & Nelson M. (1996). Auditors’ Incentives and Their Application of Financial Accounting Standards. Accounting Review, 71(1), 43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C.: 2000, ‹Risk Management for Accountants’, in A. Scott (ed.), Risk Management for Accountants (abg professional Information, London)

  • Hofmann M. (2007). Large Companies Worry About Reputational Risks. Business Insurance, 41(18), 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume E. C., Larkins E. R., & Iyer G. (1999). On Compliance with Ethical Standards in Tax Return Preparation. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(2), 229–238. doi:10.1023/A:1006054014567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadous K., & Magro A. (2001). The Effects of Exposure to Practice Risk on Tax Professionals’ Judgments and Recommendations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(3), 451–475. doi:10.1506/TF76-653L-R36N-13YP

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S. E., & Reckers P. M. J. (1985). A Study of Tax Evasion Judgments. National Tax Journal, 38(1), 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk J., & Miller M. L. 1986, Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P. V. (1985). Defining “Business Ethics”: Like Nailing Jello to a Wall. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(5), 377–383. doi:10.1007/BF02388590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln Y. S., & Guba E. G. 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry. (Beverly Hills, CA., Sage)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall R. L., Armstrong R. W., & Smith M. (1998). The Ethical Environment of Tax Practitioners: Western Australian Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1265–1279. doi:10.1023/A:1005721505618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliron, V. C.: 1988, ‹A Conceptual Model of Factors Influencing Tax Preparers’ Aggressiveness’, in S. Moriarity and J. Collins (eds.), Contemporary Tax Research (University of Oklahoma), pp. 1–15

  • Murphy R. (2007). A Game with No Rules. Accountancy Age, 18(October), 14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer B. 2004. Qualitative Data Analysis: Exposing a Process for Transforming a “Messy” But “Attractive” Nuisance. In C. Humphrey, B. Lee (eds) A Real Life Guide to Accounting Research: A Behind the Scenes View of Using Qualitative Research Methods. (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 389–405

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, M.: 2003, ‹Acceptable Limits of Tax Planning: A Revenue Perspective’, KPMG Tax Conference (Ireland)

  • Patton M. Q. 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M. 2004, The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. (Demos, London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed K. (2007). Hartnett Urges Advisors to “Stop Moaning”. Accountancy Age, 19(July), 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. 1983. Morality. In: J. Flavell, E. Markman (eds) Manual of Child Psychology, Vol. 3: Cognitive Development. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 556–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson C. 2002, Real World Research, 2nd ed. (Blackwell, Oxford)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth J., Scholz J., & Witte A. 1989, Taxpayer Compliance, Volume 2: Social Science Perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders M., Lewis P., & Thornhill A. 2007, Research Methods for Business Students, 4 ed. FT/Prentice Hall, Harlow, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers D. L. 1933, Murder Must Advertise. New English Library Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer J., & Zimmer M. (1998). Limiting Insurance Decisions and Premium Charges Among CPA Firms: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Applied Business Research, 14(1), 69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka P., & Hampton M. (2005). The Role of Accountancy Firms in Tax Avoidance: Some Evidence and Issues. Accounting Forum, 29(3), 325–343. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2005.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson E. (2004). The Ramsay Principle: A Curious Incident of Judicial Reticence. British Tax Review, 4, 358–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer P. 1994. Introduction. In: P. Singer (eds) Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K. (1990). Integrating Three Perspectives on Noncompliance – A Sequential Decision Model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(3), 350–369. doi:10.1177/0093854890017003008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S. J., & Bogdan R. 1984, Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiley J. (2004). Tax Avoidance Jurisprudence as Normal Law. British Tax Review, 4, 304–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick K. E. (1983). Stress in Accounting Systems. Accounting Review, 58(2), 350–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Westat, Inc.: 1980, ‹Individual Income Tax Compliance Factors Study Qualitative Research’, Report Prepared for the Internal Revenue Service

  • Wyman P. (1997). Upholding the Law. The Tax Journal, 10(November), 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Yancey W. (1996). Managing a Tax Practice to Avoid Malpractice Claims. The CPA Journal, 66(2), 12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetmar S., Cooper R., & Frank G. (1998). Ethical Issues Facing CPA Tax Practitioners. The CPA Journal, 68(10), 28–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Yetmar S., & Eastman K. (2000). Tax Practitioners’ Ethical Sensitivity: A Model and Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(4), 271–288. doi:10.1023/A:1006294517573

    Article  Google Scholar 

Table of statutes

  • Great Britain. Finance Act 2000: Elizabeth II. Chapter 17. (2000) London: The Stationery Office

  • Taxes Consolidation Act (Ireland) 1997, Number 39 of 1997, Direct Tax Acts, Finance 2007 version, Irish Taxation Institute

  • USA. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107–204, 116 Stat. 745 (July 30, 2002)

Table of cases

  • Ayrshire Pullman Services and D.M. Ritchie v CIR 14 TC 754

  • Barclays Mercantile Business Finance Ltd v Mawson HL 2004

  • Fitzwilliam (Countess) and Others v CIR [1993] 3 All ER 184

  • Furniss v Dawson [1984] AC 474

  • Ramsay (WT) Ltd v CIR [1981] 1 All ER 865

  • Re Weston’s Settlements [1969] 1 Ch 223

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Elaine M. Doyle

  2. Sheffield University Management School, Sheffield, England

    Jane Frecknall Hughes & Keith W. Glaister

Authors
  1. Elaine M. Doyle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane Frecknall Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keith W. Glaister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elaine M. Doyle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doyle, E.M., Hughes, J.F. & Glaister, K.W. Linking Ethics and Risk Management in Taxation: Evidence from an Exploratory Study in Ireland and the UK. J Bus Ethics 86, 177–198 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9842-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9842-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation