Skip to main content
Log in

Assurance Services for Sustainability Reports: Standards and Empirical Evidence

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article contributes to the growing scholarship on the topic of assurance services for sustainability reports. We first synthetically illustrate the main international standards for the implementation of assurance services regarding the subject documents. The second part of our article is an empirical analysis of reports drawn up on the basis of the current Global Reporting Initiative 2006 guidelines, and looks at how effectively these standards have been implemented, analyzing the different typologies of assurance statement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AA1000 AS:

Accountability 1000 Assurance Standard

FEE:

Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens

GRI:

Global Reporting Initiative

G3:

Sustainability Reporting Guidelines Version 3.0

IAASB:

International Auditing and Assurance Standard Board

IFAC:

International Federation of Accountants

ISA:

International Standard on Auditing

ISAE 3000:

International Standard on Assurance Engagement 3000

ISEA:

The Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability

References

  • Adams C. A.: 2004, The Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting Performance Portrayal Gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 17(5), 731–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball A.-D. L. Owen and R. H. Gray: 2000, ‹External Transparency or Internal Capture? The Role of Third Party Statements in Adding Value to Corporate Environmental Reports’, Business strategy and the Environment 9(1), 1–23

  • Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires aux Comptes (CNCC): 2004, Informal Guidance on Pratique professionnelle relative au rapport du Commissaire aux Comptes sur certaines données ou informations environnementales et sociales ou sur les procédures d’établissement de ces données ou informations, contenus dans le rapport rendant compte en matière de développement durable

  • Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti (CNDC): 2006, Linee guida per l’asseverazione dei report di sostenibilità

  • Dando N., Swift T.: 2003, Transparency and Assurance. Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2), 195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C., Cooper B. J., Shelly M.: 2006, An Investigation of TBL Report Assurance Statements: UK and European Evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal 21(4), 329–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAR SRS (The Swedish association of auditors): 2004, Proposed Recommendation on Independent Review of Voluntary Separate Sustainability Report

  • Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens (FEE): 2006, Key Issues in Sustainability Assurance. An Overview

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2006, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Version 3.0

  • Gray R.: 2000, Current Developments and Trends in Social and Environmental Auditing, Reporting and Attestation: A Review and Comment. International Journal of Auditing 4(4), 247–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R. 2001, Thirty Years of Social Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: What (If Anything) Have We Learnt?. Business Ethics: A European Review 10(1), 9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R., Bebbington J., Collison D.: 2006, NGOs, Civil Society and Accountability: Making the People Accountable to Capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(3), 319–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R., Dey C., Owen D., Evans R., Zadek S.: 1997, Struggling with the Praxis of Social Accounting Stakeholders, Accountability, Audits and Procedures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10(3), 325–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan M., Maijoor S., Mock T. J., Roebuck P., Simnett R., Vanstraelen A.: 2005, The Different Types of Assurance Services and Levels of Assurance Provided. International Journal of Auditing 9(2), 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer in Deutschland (IDW): 2005, Germany Generally Accepted Assurance Principles for Audit or Review of Sustainability Reports (ED As)

  • Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA): 1999, ‹AA1000 Framework’, Institute of Social and Ethical Engagement, UK

  • Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability (ISEA): 2003, ‹AA1000 Assurance Standard’, London

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standard Board (IAASB): 2004, ‹International Standard on Assurance Engagement 3000. Assurance Engagement Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Information’, International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, New York, NY

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB): 2006, Assurance Aspects of G3 – The Global Reporting Initiative’s 2006 Draft Sustainability Reporting Guidelines

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): 2002, ‹The Determination and Communication of Levels of Assurance Other than High’, New York

  • Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut van Registeraccountants (NIVRA): 2005, The Netherlands: Practitioners Working with Subject Matter Experts from other Disciplines on Non-Financial Assurance Engagements (ED 3010) and Assurance Engagements Relating to Sustainability Reports (ED 3410)

  • KPMG-Amsterdam Graduate Business School: 2005, KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting (University of Amsterdam Publisher)

  • Milne M. J.,Adler R. W.: 1999, Exploring the Reliability of Social and Environmental Disclosures Content Analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 12(2), 237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natale S. M., Ford J. W.: 1994, Social Audit and Ethics. Managerial Auditing Journal 9(1), 29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer B., Unerman J., Bradley J.: 2005, Perceptions on the Emergence and Future Development of Corporate Social Disclosure in Ireland. Engaging the Voices of Non-Governmental Organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18(1), 14–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. and B. O’Dwyer: 2004, ‹Assurance Statement Quality in Environmental, Social and Sustainability Reporting: A Critical Evaluation of Leading Edge Practice’, Research Paper Series International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, University of Nottingham

  • Owen D., O’Dwyer B.: 2005, Assurance Statement Practice in Environmental, Social and Sustainability Reporting: A Critical Evaluation. The British Accounting Review 37, 205–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia, Standard AS/NZS 5911 (Int): 2005, General Guidelines on the Verification, Validation and Assurance of Environmental and Sustainability Reports

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Manetti.

Additional information

Their research interests are in the field of corporate social responsibility and management accounting for not for profit organizations. Although this article is the result of a joint effort, Sections “Introduction, Essential elements of assurance services according to the ISAE 3000 and Criticisms regarding future assurance standards” has been written by Giacomo Manetti, Section “Empirical evidence from GRI reports” by Lucia Becatti, and Section “Conclusions” jointly by both authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manetti, G., Becatti, L. Assurance Services for Sustainability Reports: Standards and Empirical Evidence. J Bus Ethics 87 (Suppl 1), 289–298 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9809-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9809-x

Keywords

Navigation