Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Socially Responsible Investing: The Effect of Decision Frames and Trade-off Options

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the phenomenon of socially responsible investing has become more widespread. However, knowledge about the individual socially responsible investor is largely limited to descriptive and comparative accounts. The question of “why do some investors practice socially responsible investing and others don’t?” is therefore still largely unanswered. To address this shortcoming in the current literature, this paper develops a model of the decision to invest socially responsibly that is grounded in the cognition literature. The hypotheses proposed in the model are tested with an experimental survey. The results indicate that the framing of the investing situation influences the likelihood of engagement in socially responsible investing and how much return the individuals are willing to sacrifice when choosing socially responsible over conventional investments. The study does not find support for a relationship between expectations about corporate social responsibility and the likelihood of engagement in socially responsible investing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D. E., E. G. McGoun and G. W. Kester: 2000, `A Sociological Explanation of Financial Market Growth', International Review of Financial Analysis 9, 421–432

  • Anand, P., Cowton, C. J. 1992, The Ethical Investor: Exploring Dimensions of Investment Behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology 14, 377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J. 2003, What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features. Journal of Business Ethics 42(3), 281–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., Hatfield, J. D. 1985, An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28(2), 446–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., Heiner, K. 2002, Exploring the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business & Society 41(3), 292–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Jones, T. M. 1999, Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 42, 488–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brealy R. A., Stewart C. M., Allen F. 2006, Principles of Corporate Finance (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., Mischel, W. 1977 Traits as Prototypes: Effects on Recognition Memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., Attala, A. 2001, The Myth of the Ethical Consumer – Do Ethics Matter in Purchase Behaviour. Journal of Consumer Marketing 18(7), 560–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. 1979, A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Historical Perspective. In: M. J. Epstein, K. O. Hanson (eds), The Accountable Corporation, Vol. 3. Praeger, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellar, D. F., Barrett, G. V. 1987, Script Processing and Intrinsic Motivation: The Cognitive Sets Underlying Cognitive Labels. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 40, 115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C. E.: 1981, Person Categories and Social Perception: Testing Some Boundaries of the Processing Effects of Prior Knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40, 441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creyer, E. H., Ross, W. T. 1997, The Influence of Firm Behavior on Purchase Intention: Do Consumers Really Care About Business Ethics?. Journal of Consumer Marketing 14(6), 419–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSR Europe: 2001, The European Survey on Socially Responsible Investment and the Financial Community (Brussels)

  • Cullis, J. G., Lewis, A., Winnett, A. 1992, Paying to be Good? U.K. Ethical Investments. Kyklos 45(1), 3–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T., Meglino, B. 1984, A Cognitive View of the Performance Appraisal Process: A Model and Research Propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 33, 360–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domini, A. K.: 1994, Ethical Investing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Domini Social Investments: 2006, ‘Global Investment Standards’, http://www.domini.com/common/pdf/Global_Investment_Standards.pdf

  • Downes, J., Goodman, J. E. 1999, Barron’s Finance and Investment Handbook. Barron’s, Happague, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W.: 2003, Social Investing: Mainstream of Backwater?. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, S. P., Rykaczewski, K. P. 1986, Social Investment and the Management of Pension Portfolios. Journal of the American Society of CLU and CHFC 40(6), 60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Taylor, S. E. 1991, Social Cognition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, SM17

  • Gray, R., Owen, D., Adams, C. 1996, Accounting and Accountability. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, E. L., Grathwohl, H. L. 1967, Consumer Self-Concept, Symbolism and Market Behavior: A Theoretical Approach. Journal of Marketing 31, 22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D. 2001, Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?. Strategic Management Journal 22, 125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1988, Price Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. K., Banister, E. N. 2001, Dislikes, Distastes and the Undesired Self: Conceptualizing and Exploring the Role of the Undesired End State in Consumer Experience. Journal of Marketing Management 17, 73–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. K., Michell, P. C. N. 1996, Identity, Self and Consumption: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Marketing Management 12, 629–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, M. O.: 1992, “Socially Responsible” Investing: Doing Good Versus Doing Well in an Inefficient Market. American University Law Review 42(1), 1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1981, Mental Models in Cognitive Science. In: D. A. Norman (ed), Perspectives on Cognitive Science. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 147–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. 1980, Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review 22(3), 59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, C., Siegrist, M. 2006, Money Attitude Typology and Stock Investment. Journal of Behavioral Finance 7(2), 88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine, R. E., Kleine, S. S., Kernan, J. B. 1993, Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social-Identity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2(3), 209–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, J. H., Posner, R. A. 1980, Social Investing and the Law of Trust. Michigan Law Review 79(1), 72–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. 2001, A Focus Group Study of the Motivations to Invest: “Ethical/Green” and “Ordinary” Investors Compared. Journal of Socio-Economics 30, 331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A., Mackenzie, C. 2000a, Morals, Money, Ethical Investing and Economic Psychology. Human Relations 53(2), 179–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A., Mackenzie, C. 2000b, Support for Investor Activism Among U.K Ethical Investors. Journal of Business Ethics 24(3), 215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J. 1965, The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Journal of Economics and Statistics 47(1), 13–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., DeVader, C. L. 1984, A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 34, 343–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurigio, A. J., Carroll, J. S. 1985, Probation Officer’s Schemata of Offenders: Content, Development, and Impact on Treatment Decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48(5), 1112–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C., Lewis, A. 1999, Morals and Markets: The Case of Ethical Investing. Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3), 439–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C. A., B. Saadouni and R. J. Briston: 1995, `The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Funds', Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 22(4), 483–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. 1952, Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance 7(1), 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. 1977, Self-Schemata and Processing Information About the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. 1988, Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character or Consumer Goods and Activities. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J., Gardner, J. 2004, A Comparison of Socially Responsible and Conventional Investors. Journal of Business Ethics 52(1), 11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money: 2007, ‘The Money 70’, Money 36, 64–66

  • Pearce, B., and J. Ganzi: 2002, ‘Engaging the Mainstream with Sustainability’, Forum for the Future’s Centre for Sustainable Investment and The Finance Institute for Global Sustainability

  • Pitz, G. F., Sachs, N. J. 1984, Judgment and Decision: Theory and Application. Annual Review of Psychology 35, 139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A. 1996, Will the Real Socially Responsible Consumer Please Step Forward?. Business Horizons 39(1), 79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B. N., Sandler, D. M., Shani, D. 1991, Social Issues and Socially Responsible Investment Behavior: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 25(3), 221–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B. 2001, Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38, 225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J., Fischer, S., Friedman, B. M. 1984, Stock Prices and Social Dynamics. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1984(2), 457–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, F. L.: 1995, `Global Corporate Philanthropy: A Strategic Framework', International Marketing Review 12(4), 20–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. N.: 1990, Morality and the Market, Consumer Pressure for Corporate Accountability (Routledge, London)

  • Social Investment Forum: 2006, 2005 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States (Social Investment Forum, Washington, DC)

  • Sparkes, R. 1998, The Challenge of Ethical Investment: Activism, Assets and Analysis. In: I. Jones, M. Pollitt (eds), The Role of Business Ethics in Economic Performance. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY, pp. 141–171

    Google Scholar 

  • The Financial Planning Association: 2004, ‘20 Keys to Being a Smart Investor’, http://www.smartaboutmoney.org/nefe/uploadfiles/Smarter%20Investor.pdf

  • Tippet, J., Leung, D. 2001, Defining Ethical Investment and its Demography in Australia. Australian Accounting Review 11(3), 44–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Traflet, J.: 2003, ‘Own Your Share of American Business: Public Relations at the NYSE during the Cold War’, Business and Economic History On-Line 1, http://www.thebhc.org/publications/BEHonline/2003/Traflet.pdf

  • Uusitalo, O., Oksanen, R. 2004, Ethical Consumerism: A View From Finland. International Journal of Consumer Studies 28(3), 214–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., Graves, S. B. 2000, Performance Characteristics of Social and Traditional Investments. Journal of Investing 9(2), 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P.: 1995, Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes From a Trip Down Memory Lane. Organization Science 6(3), 280–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wattanasuwan, K.: 2005, ‘The Self and Symbolic Consumption’, Journal of American Academy of Business 6, 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Webley, P., Lewis, A., Mackenzie, C. 2001, Commitment Among Ethical Investors: An Experimental Approach. Journal of Economic Psychology 22, 27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. 1979, Cognitive Processes in Organizations. In: B. Staw (ed), Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 41–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by a grant from The Carol and Lawrence Zicklin Center for Business Ethics Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherina Glac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glac, K. Understanding Socially Responsible Investing: The Effect of Decision Frames and Trade-off Options. J Bus Ethics 87 (Suppl 1), 41–55 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9800-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9800-6

Keywords

Navigation