Skip to main content
Log in

Alasdair Macintyre’s Aristotelian Business Ethics: A Critique

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper begins by summarizing and distilling MacIntyre’s sweeping critique of modern business. It identifies the crux of MacIntyre’s critique as centering on the fundamental Aristotelian concepts of internal goods and practices. MacIntyre essentially follows Aristotle in arguing that by privileging external goods over internal goods, business activity – and certainly modern capitalistic business activity – corrupts practices. Thus, from the perspective of virtue ethics, business is morally indefensible. The paper continues with an evaluation of MacIntyre’s arguments. The conclusion is drawn that MacIntyre’s critique, although partially valid, does not vitiate modern business as he claims. In short, modern business need not of necessity be antithetical to individuals’ pursuit of internal goods within practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumaol W. J., R. E. Litan, C. J. Schramm, 2007, Good Capitalism Bad Capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chytry, J.: 2007, ‹Organizational Aesthetics: The Artful Firm and the Aesthetic Moment in Contemporary Business and Management Theory’, Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley

  • Frazer E., N. Lacey 1994, MacIntyre, Feminism and the Concept of Practice, in J. Horton, S. Mendus, (eds.), After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B. 2005, The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth. New York: Knopf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.: 2007, Capitalism at the Crossroads (New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing)

  • Jensen, M. C.: 2001, ‹Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function’, Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection

  • Keat, R.: 2007, ‹Ethics, Markets and MacIntyre’, Paper for the Conference on Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism, HRSJ Research Institute, London Metropolitan University, 29th June to 1st July

  • Klein, S.: 1988, ‹Is a Moral Organization Possible?’, Business & Professional Ethics Journal 7(1), 51–73

  • Krech, I. I. I. S.: 1999, The Ecological Indian (New York: Norton paperbacks)

  • Kreps, D. (1997) Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 359–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. 2005, Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1977, Utilitarianism and Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Essay on the Relevance of Moral Philosophy to Bureaucratic Theory, in K. Sayre, (ed.), Values in the Electric Power Industry. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1979, Corporate Modernity and Moral Judgment: Are They Mutually Exclusive?, in K. E. Goodpaster, K. M. Sayer, (eds.), Ethics and Problems of the 21st Century. Notre Dame: University of Notre dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1982, Why are the Problems of Business Ethics Insoluble, in B. Baumrin, B. Friedman, (eds.), Moral Responsibility and the Professions. New York: Haven Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1984, After Virtue, 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1994, A Partial Response to my Critics, in J. Horton, S. Mendus, (eds.), After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1999a, Dependant Rational Animals. Illinois: Open Court Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1999b). Social Structures and Their Threat to Moral Agency. Philosophy (London, England), 74(289), 311–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. 2004, The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B.: 1990, ‹King Midas in America’, in C. C. Walton (ed.), Enhancing Business Ethics (Plenum Press, New York)

  • Sen, A.: 1997, ‹Maximization and the Act of Choice’, Econometrica 65, 745–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1992). Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach to Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 317–339. doi:10.2307/3857536

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Dobson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dobson, J. Alasdair Macintyre’s Aristotelian Business Ethics: A Critique. J Bus Ethics 86, 43–50 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9792-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9792-2

Keywords

Navigation