Skip to main content
Log in

Virtue Ethics in Business and the Capabilities Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum have developed the capabilities approach to provide a model for understanding the effectiveness of programs to help the developing nations. The approach holds that human beings are fundamentally free and have a sense of human dignity. Therefore, institutions need to help people enhance this dignity by providing them with␣the opportunity to develop their capabilities freely. I␣argue that this approach may help support business ethics based on virtue. Since teleology has become problematic, virtue ethics has had difficulty giving itself an ultimate justification. By combining virtue ethics with the capabilities approach, it becomes possible to ground virtue ethics on the basis of the existence of human dignity. This frees virtue ethics of the need for a strict teleology, replacing it with the notion that people must work to develop the capabilities of others although those capabilities are not pointed toward a definite goal. I further suggest that by grounding virtue ethics in capabilities, the actions of a virtuous manager become clearer. Rather than simply charging a manager with serving the public, the manager is charged with serving the stakeholders in a way that develops their capabilities. For example, a manager should not just give their employees what is just but must give them the environment and the encouragement to grow and to find fulfillment in their job.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle: 1984, Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Hippocrates G. Apostle (Peripatetic Press, Grinell)

  • Arjoon S.: 2000, Virtue Theory as a Dynamic Theory of Business. Journal of Business Ethics 28, 159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie N., Werhane P. 2005, Management Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Lencioni P. 2002, The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Machan, Tibor R.: 2004, ‹Aristotle and the Moral Status of Business’, Journal of Value Inquiry 38, 217–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum M. 2000, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. 1999, Development as Freedom. New York: Random House

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon R. 1992, Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack J., Burlingham, B. 1992, The Great Game of Business. New York: Doubleday

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooft S. 2001, Overcoming Principles: Dialogue in Business Ethics. Teaching Business Ethics 5, 89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone J. T. 2001, How Virtue Fits Within Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 33, 101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Bertland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bertland, A. Virtue Ethics in Business and the Capabilities Approach. J Bus Ethics 84 (Suppl 1), 25–32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9686-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9686-3

Keywords

Navigation