Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the assumption that consumers will reward firms for their support of social programs, many organizations have adopted corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices. Drawing on social identity theory, a model of influence of CSR on loyalty is developed and tested using a sample of real consumers. Results demonstrate that CSR initiatives are linked to stronger loyalty both because the consumer develops a more positive company evaluation, and because one identifies more strongly with the company. Moreover, identity salience is shown to play a crucial role in the influence of CSR initiatives on consumer loyalty when this influence occurs through consumer-company identification. A strong identifier is not necessarily in a constant state of salience, but activating identity salience of a particular consumer social identity (a company) will affect consumer reactions to product stimuli, increasing consumer loyalty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker D. A.: 2004, Leveraging the Corporate Brand. California Management Review 46(3), 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahearne M., C. B. Bhattacharya, T. W. Gruen: 2005, Antecedents and Consequences of Customer-Company Identification: Expanding the Role of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(3), 574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S. and D. A. Whetten: 1985, ‹Organizational Identity’, in L. L. Cummings y B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 263–295

  • Albinger H. S., S. J. Freeman: 2000, Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics 28(3), 243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett D. B., S. D. German, S. D. Hunt: 2003, The Identity Salience Model of Relationship Marketing Success: The Case of Nonprofit Marketing. Journal of Marketing 67, 89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R., Y. Yi: 1988, On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1), 74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber A. E.: 1998, Recruiting Employees: Individual and Organizational Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, S. C., A. S. Christensen and A. G. Christensen: 2001, Myths of Nature and Environmentally Responsible Behaviours: An Exploratory Study. Proceedings of the 30th European Marketing Academy Conference, Bergen

  • Berens G., C. B. M. van Riel, G. H. van Bruggen: 2005, Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses: The Moderating Role of Corporate Brand Dominance. Journal of Marketing 69, 35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergami M., R. P. Bagozzi: 2000, Self-Categorization, Affective Commitment and Group Self-Esteem as Distinct Aspects of Social Identity in the Organization. The British Journal of Social Psychology 39, 555–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya C. B., S. Sen:2003, Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing 67(2), 76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya C. B., S. Sen: 2004, Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 47(1), 9–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya C. B., H. Rao, M. A. Glynn: 1995, Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of Its Correlates Art Museum Members. Journal of Marketing 59(4), 46–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bone P. F., P. S. Ellen: 1992, The Generation and Consequences of Comunication-Evoked Imagery. Journal of Consumer Research 19(1), 93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boninger D. S., J. A. Krosnick, M. K. Berent: 1995, The Causes of Attitude Importance: Self-Interest, Social Identification, and Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, 61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding W., A. Kirmani: 1993, A Consumer-Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signals of Quality?. Journal of Consumer Research 20(1), 111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulstridge E., M. Carrigan: 2000, Do Consumers Really Care About Corporate Responsibility? Highlighting the Attitude-Behavior Gap. Journal of Communication Management 4(4), 355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown T. J., P. A. Dacin: 1997, The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing 61(1), 68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke P. J.: 1980, The Self: Measurement Requirements from an Interactionist Perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly 43(1), 18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke P. J.: 1991, Identity Processes and Social Stress. American Social Review 56(6), 836–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardador T., M. Pratt:2006, Identification Management and Its Bases: Bridging Management and Marketing Perspectives Through a Focus on Affiliation Dimensions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2), 174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer J., J. Jonker, A. van der Heijden: 2004, Making Sense of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 55, 215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du S., C. B. Bhattacharya, S. Sen: 2007, Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing 24, 224–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton J. E., J. M. Dukerich, C. V. Harquail: 1994, Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(2), 239–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. and S. Chaiken: 1993, The Psychology of Attitudes (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich)

  • Fitchett J. A., P. McDonagh: 2000, A Citizen’s Critique of Relationship Marketing in Risk Society. Journal of Marketing Strategy 8(2), 209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand M. R., R. Deshpandé, A. Reed II: 2002, Identity Salience and the Influence of Differential Activation of the Social Self-Schema on Advertising Response. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(6), 1086–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C., D. F. Larcker: 1981, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M. M., A. H. Crespo, I. R. Del Bosque: 2005, Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Loyalty and Valuation of Services. Journal of Business Ethics 61, 369–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison J. S., R. E. Freeman: 1999, Stakeholders, Social Responsability, and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 479–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse S., F. Lievens, E. F. Sinar: 2003, Measuring Attraction to Organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement 63(6), 986–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D., K. Grayson: 2005, Cognitive and Affective Trust in Service Relationships. Journal of Business Research 58(4), 500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog K., D. Sörbom: 2004, LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein D. R., M. E. Drumwright, B. M. Braig: 2004, The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits. Journal of Marketing 68, 16–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens F., F. Fruyt, K. van Dam: 2001, Assessors’ Use of Personality Traits in Descriptions of Assessment Centre Candidates: A Five-Factor Model Perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 75(5), 623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens L., S. Highhouse: 2003, The Relation of Instrumental and Symbolic Attributes to a Company’s Attractiveness as an Employer. Personnel Psychology 56(1), 75–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madrigal R.: 2001, Social Identity Effects in a Belief-Attitude-Intentions Hierarchy: Implications for Corporate Sponsorship. Psychology and Marketing 18(2), 145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mael F., B. E. Ashforth: 1992, Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior 13(2), 103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I.: 2001, Consumers’ Perfeptions of Corporate Social Responsiblities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 30(1), 57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I., O. C. Ferrell: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32(1), 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan I., O. C. Ferrell, L. Ferrell: 2005, A Stakeholder Model for Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing. European Journal of Marketing 39(9), 956–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan V., Y. Wind: 2002, Got Emotional Product Positioning? Marketing Management 11(3), 36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel S. P., F. R. Kardes: 1999, The Role of Direction of Comparison, Atrribute-Based Processing, and Attitude-Based Processing in Consumer Preference. Journal of Consumer Research 25(4), 335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín L., S. Ruiz: 2007, ‹‹I Need You Too!’’ Corporate Identity Attractiveness for Consumers and the Role of Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 71, 245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R. and E. Wurf: 1987, ‹The Dynamic Self-Concept: A Social-Psychological Perspective’, in Mark R. Rosenzweig and Lyman W. Porter (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology 38, 299–337

  • Mohr L. A., D. J. Webb: 2005, The Effects of Corporate Social Responsability and Price on Consumer Responses. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 39(1), 121–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogrizek M.: 2002, Forum Paper: The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Branding of Financial Services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 6(3), 215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley L., A. Prothero: 2004, Beyond the Frills of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Business Research 57(11), 1286–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirsch J., S. Gupta, S. L. Grau: 2007, A Framework for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Programs as a Continuum: An Exploratory St. Journal of Business Ethics 70(2), 125–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed A. II: 2002, Social Identity as a Useful Perspective for Self-Concept-Based Consumer Research. Psychology and Marketing 19(3), 235–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed A. II: 2004, Activating the Self-Importance of Consumer Selves: Exploring Identity Salience Effects on Judgements. Journal of Consumer Research 31(2), 286–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra A., P. M. Bentler: 2001, A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis. Psychometrika 66, 507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott S. G., V. R. Lane: 2000, A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity. The Academy of Management Rewiew 25(1), 43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen S., C. B. Bhattacharya: 2001, Does Doing Good Alwais Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2), 225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen S., C. B. Bhattacharya, D. Korschun: 2006, The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2), 158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir B.: 1991, Meaning, Self, and Motivation in Organizations. Organization Studies 12(3), 405–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker S., P. J. Burke: 2000, The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63(4), 284–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H.: 1988, Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior (Cambridge, University Press)

  • Tajfel, H. and J. C. Turner: 1985, ‹The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour’, in S. G. Worchel and W. Austin (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd Edition (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), pp. 7–24

  • Turban D. B., D. W. Greening: 1997, Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal 40(3), 658–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell S. J.: 2003, Consumer Ethics Research: Review, Synthesis and Suggestions for the Future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1/2), 33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon Y., Z. Gürhan-Canli, B. Bozok: 2006, Drawing Inferences About Others Based on Corporate Social Responsibilities Associations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2), 106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marina Ruiz-Corbalan, Maria Marin-Rubio, and two anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments and suggestions. They also thank Fundacion Cajamurcia for its generous support. This research was funded by the grant SEJ2005-09358/ECON from the Spanish Ministry of Science & Technology and FEDER.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvador Ruiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marin, L., Ruiz, S. & Rubio, A. The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. J Bus Ethics 84, 65–78 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9673-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9673-8

Keywords

Navigation