Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Just Price: Three Insights from the Salamanca School

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, members of the Salamanca School engaged in a sustained and sophisticated discussion of the issue of just prices. This article uses their contribution as a point of departure for a consideration of justice in pricing which will be relevant to current-day circumstances. The key theses of members of this school were that fairness of exchanges should be assessed objectively, that the fair price of an article is one equal to its ‘value’, and that the best indicator of that value is the price that article commonly fetches in an open market. This article tries to bring to light the attractiveness of those views in order to guide current practice by contrasting them with alternative views, showing their connection with intuitively attractive basic standards, and linking them to commonly shared intuitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquinas, T.: 1981, Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province (Christian Classics, Westminster, MD).

  • Aristotle: 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by J. A. K. Thomson (Penguin Classics, London).

  • Arnold, D.G. (2003). Exploitation and the Sweatshop Quandary. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, A. (1997). Exchange-Value Determination: Scholastic Just Price, Economic Theory, and Modern Catholic Social Thought. History of Political Economy, 29(1), 83–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomé de Albornoz: 1573, Arte de los contratos (En Casa de Pedro Huete, Valencia).

  • Block, W. (2002). A critique of the legal and philosophical case for rent control. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 75–90. doi:10.1023/A:1019952703506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenkert, G.G. 2008. Marketing Ethics. Blackwell, Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J., Ó Tuama, S. (2005). International Pricing and Distribution of Therapeutic Pharmaceuticals: An ethical Minefield. Business Ethics: a European Review, 14(2), 127–141. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00397.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B., & Buchholtz, A.B. 2008. Business & Society. Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 7th edition. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, L.B. 1995, Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Vigo, A. (1979). La Teoría del Justo Precio Corriente en los Moralistas Españoles del Siglo de Oro. Burguense, 22, 57–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, J. 2009, An Introduction to Business Ethics. 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P.A. (1971). A Model of Price Adjustment. Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 156–168. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(71)90013-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo de Soto: 1968, De iustitia er jure (Facsimil Edition) (Instituto de Estudios Políticos, Madrid).

  • Francisco de Vitoria: 1934, Comentarios a la Secunda Secundae de Santo Tomás. Edited by Vicente Beltrán de Heredia (Biblioteca de Teólogos Españoles, Salamanca).

  • Glazer, A. (1984). The Client Relationship and a “Just’’ Price. The American Economic Review, 74(5), 1089–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanly, K. (1991). The Ethics of Rent Control. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 189–200. doi:10.1007/BF00383156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L., & DesJardins, J. 2008. Business Ethics Decision-Making for Personal Integrity and Social Responsibility. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P.J., Ortmeyer, G.K., & Smith, N·C. (1991). Fairness in Consumer Pricing. Journal of Consumer Policy, 14, 117–140. doi:10.1007/BF00381915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Keller, K.L. 2009, Marketing Management. 13th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, C·W., Hair, J.F., & McDaniel, C. 2008. Marketing, 9th edition (Thomson South-Western, Mason, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luis de Molina: 1615, De iustitia et jure (Antwerp).

  • Maitland, I. (2002). Priceless Goods: How Should Life-Saving Drugs Be Priced?. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 451–480. doi:10.2307/3857995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maseland, R., & de Vaal, A. (2002). How Fair is Fair Trade?. De Economist, 150, 251–272. doi:10.1023/A:1016161727537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2007). What’s Wrong with Exploitation? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24, 137–150. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00360.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, C. (2004). Wrongful Beneficence: Exploitation and Third World Sweatshops. Journal of Social Philosophy, 35, 319-333. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2004.00235.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, C. (1999). What is a “Just Price”?. Journal of Markets and Morality, 2(2), 182–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2004). The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, Issues and Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 73–86. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039400.57827.c3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P.E., Laczniak, G.R., Bowie, N.E., & Klein, T.A. 2005, Ethical Marketing. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, L. H. and M. M. Ford (eds.): 2006, Taking Sides. Clashing Views in Business Ethics and Society, 9th Edition (McGraw-Hill, Dubuque, IA).

  • Pride, W.M., & Ferrell, O·C. 2008. Marketing, 14th edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roover, R. (1958). The Concept of the Just Price: Theory and Economic Policy. The Journal of Economic History, 18(4), 418–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, R. 2003, Exploitation: What It Is and why It’s Wrong. Rowman and Littlefield, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. 1998, Marketing Ethics. An International Perspective. Thomson Learning, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W·H. 2008. Business Ethics, 6th edition. Thomsom Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M.J. (1996). Strategic Marketing Planning Guided by the Quality-of-Life (QOL) Concept. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 241–259. doi:10.1007/BF00382951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N·C., & Quelch, J.A. 1993, Ethics in Marketing. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinello, R.A. (1992). Ethics, Pricing and the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 617–626. doi:10.1007/BF00872273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomás de Mercado: 1975, Suma de Tratos y Contratos. Edited by Restituto Sierra Bravo (Editora Nacional, Madrid).

  • Treviño, L.K., & Nelson, K.A. 2007, Managing Business Ethics. Straight Talk About How To Do It Right, 4th edition. John Wiley& Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M.G. 2006, Business Ethics. Concepts and Cases, 6th edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, C. 1969, Ethos and the Executive. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, A. 1996, Exploitation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwolinski, M. (2007). Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 689–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwolinski, M.: 2008, The Ethics of Price Gouging. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 347–378

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Manuel Elegido.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elegido, J.M. The Just Price: Three Insights from the Salamanca School. J Bus Ethics 90, 29–46 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0024-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0024-6

Keywords

Navigation