Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond Economic Criteria: A Humanistic Approach to Organizational Survival

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are many theories about organizations that are mutually inconsistent with each other, which explain phenomena to very similar extents. Most of them ignore the ethical dimension completely. In this paper I put forth the basic principles for a theory of decision-making in organizations, which integrates ethics in the core of the theory. It is based on the work of Juan Antonio Pérez López [1991, Teoría de la Acción humana en las organizaciones (Ediciones Rialp, Madrid), 1993, Fundamentos de la Dirección de Empresas (Ediciones Rialp, Madrid)] and is essentially a humanistic view of the interrelationships between people and its implications for organizational decision-making. I will first show that in any relationship between two people, the learning of the two is crucial for such a relationship to last; and then I will expand on the different aspects of that learning. This analysis will then be applied to the organizational context as a basis for organizational decision-making, Second, it applies the previous analysis to the organizational context as a basis for organizational decision making, showing how any decision in an organization needs to be analyzed on the basis of three criteria (short-run effectiveness, development of distinctive competence, and unity and identification with the organization) and how ethics is included in the last two.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson C. (1997) Values-based Management. Academy of Management Executive, 11(4):25–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Argandoña, A.: 2007, ‹Integrating Ethics Into Action Theory and Organizational Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9340-x

  • Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D., Donaldson L. (1997) Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22:20–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. (1991) Introduction, in Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L. (2002) Damned by Our Own Theories: Contradictions Between Theories and Management Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1):96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. 1983. Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1994) ‹Functional Explanation in Social Science’, in Martin M., McIntyre L. (eds) Readings in the Philosophy of Social Sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro F., Pfeffer J., Sutton R. (2005) Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories May Become Self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1):8–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick R. E. (2002) An Outline of Ethical Relativism and Ethical Absolutism, in Frederick R. E. (ed) A Companion to Business Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 65–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.: 2003, ‹Corporate Governance: What Can We Learn from Public Governance?’ Working Paper, Institute for Empirical Economic Research, University of Zurich

  • Frey, B. and S. Meier: 2002, ‹Pro-social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?’, CESIFO, Munich, Working Paper No. 750

  • George W. W. (1999) Mission Driven, Values Centered. Executive Excellence, 16(8):6 August

    Google Scholar 

  • George W. W. (2001) Medtronic’s Chairman William George on How Mission-driven Companies Create Long-term Shareholder Value. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • George, W. W.: 2003, Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco)

  • Ghoshal S. (2005) Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1):75–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S., Hart O. (1983) An Analysis of the Principal-agent Problem. Econometrica, 51(1):7–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström B. (1979) Moral Hazard and Observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1):74–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. (1983) Organization Theory and Methodology. The Accounting Review, LVIII(2):319–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. (2000) ‹Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Function’, in Beer M., Nohria N. (eds) Breaking the Code of Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Also in Journal of Corporate Finance, Fall 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M., Meckling B. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3:305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein G. (1996) Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996. 65(2):272–292 March

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J., Olsen J. (1975) The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning under Ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3:147–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak J., Radner R. (1972) Economic Theory of Teams. The Cowless Foundation, New Haven and London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor D. (1966) Leadership and Motivation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé D. (2003) The Challenge of Humanistic Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J., Rowan B. (1977) Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83:340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilakant V., Rao H. (1994) Agency Theory and Uncertainty in Organizations: An Evaluation. Organization Studies, 15(5):649–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue T., Rabin M. (1999) Doing it Now or Later. American Economic Review, 89(1):103–124 March

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez López J. A. (1991) Teoría de la Acción humana en las organizaciones. Rialp, Madrid, Ediciones

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez López J. A. (1993) Fundamentos de la Dirección de Empresas. Ediciones Rialp, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanas, J. M.: 2004, Bounded Rationality, Value Systems and Time Inconsistency of Preferences as Rational Foundations for the Concept of Trust, IESE Business School, Working Paper no. 567

  • Rosanas J. M., Velilla M. (2003) Loyalty and Trust as the Ethical Bases of Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 44:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S. (1973) The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal’s Problem. American Economic Review, 63(2):134–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott R. (1987) Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P. (1957) Leadership in Administration. University of California Press, Berkeley Los Angeles and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P. (1996) Institutionalism, ‹Old’ and ‹New’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. (1977) Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6:317–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge P. (2000) The Puzzles and Paradoxes of How Living Companies Create Wealth. in Beer M., Nohria N. (eds) Breaking the Code of Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp. 59–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H.: 1947, First Edition, 1997 Fourth Edition. Administrative Behavior (The Free Press, New York)

  • Yariv, L.: 2002, ‹I’ll See It When I Believe It – A Simple Model of Cognitive Consistency’, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper, No. 1352

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Contabilidad y Control, IESE, Universidad de Navarra, Av. Pearson, 21, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

    Josep M. Rosanas

Authors
  1. Josep M. Rosanas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josep M. Rosanas.

Additional information

Josep M. Rosanas is professor of Accounting and Control and “Crèdit Andorrà” Chair of Markets, Organizations and Humanism, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Spain. He is a Ph.D. in Accounting and Information Systems (Northwestern University, 1977), Doctor in Industrial Engineering (Polytechnical University of Catalonia, 1981) MBA (IESE, University of Navarra, 1971) and Nuclear Engineer (Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 1969). He is the author of several books and articles related with management control and ethics and has been consultant to many organizations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosanas, J.M. Beyond Economic Criteria: A Humanistic Approach to Organizational Survival. J Bus Ethics 78, 447–462 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9341-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9341-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation