Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Socratic Questions and Aristotelian Answers: A Virtue-Based Approach to Business Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To teach that being ethical requires knowing foundational ethical principles – or, as Socrates claimed, airtight definitions of ethical terms – is to invite cynicism among students, for students discover that no such principles can be found. Aristotle differs from Socrates in claiming that ethics is about virtues primarily, and that one can be virtuous without having the sort of knowledge that characterizes mathematics or natural science. Aristotle is able to demonstrate that ethics and self-interest may overlap, that ethics is largely compatible with common sense, and that Aristotle’s virtuous person can make ethical decisions rationally. Case studies can help students improve their ethical perception and keep their values from being overwhelmed by corporate culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alzola, M.: 2007, ‚Character and Environment: The Status of Virtues in Organizations’, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9335-7

  • Aristotle: 1924, Metaphysics, W. D. Ross (ed.) (Clarendon Press, Oxford)

  • Aristotle: 1936, Physics W. D. Ross (ed.) (Clarendon Press, Oxford)

  • Aristotle: 1985, Nicomachean Ethics (NE), T. H. Irwin (trans.) (Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, IN)

  • Beaman A. L., Barnes P. J., Klentz B., McQuirk B. (1978) Increasing Helping Rates Through Information Dissemination: Teaching Pays. The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4:406–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk R. W. (1985) Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World. Journal Of Consumer Research 12:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken S., Giner-Sorolla R., Chen S. (1996) Beyond Accuracy: Defense and Impression Motives in Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing In: Gollwitzer P. M., Bargh J. A. (eds), The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. Guilford, New York, pp 553–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen A. Y. S., Sawyers R. B., Williams P. F. (1997) Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making Through Corporate Culture. Journal of Business Ethics 16:855–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels N. (1979) Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. Journal of Philosophy 76:256–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley J. M. (1996) How Organizations Socialize Individuals into Evildoing In: Messick D. M., Tenbrunsel A. E. (eds) Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 13–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry R., Green R. (1989) Ethical Theory in Business Ethics: “A Critical Assessment”. Journal of Business Ethics 8:521–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L.: 2007, ‚Ethics Problems and Problems with␣Ethics: Towards a Pro-Management Theory’, DOI 10.1007/s10551-006-9336-6

  • Doris J. (2002) Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: 1984, Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality, rev. ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York)

  • Elster J. (1985) Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1998) Emotions and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Literature 36:47–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank R. H. (1988), Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt H. G. (1981) Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person In: Watson G. (eds) Free Will. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J. (2001) The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review 108:814–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J. (2006) The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman G. (2003) No Character or Personality. Business Ethics Quarterly 13:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman E. M. (2006) Can We Teach Character? An Aristotelian Answer. Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(1):68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser T., Ryan R. M. (1996) Further Examining the American Dream: Differential Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22:280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman J. (1991) Character Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis M. (1989) Liar’s Poker: Rising Through the Wreckage on Wall Street. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S. (1974) Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen G. E. L. (1967) Tithenai ta phainomena. In: Moravcsik J. M. E. (ed.) Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays. Doubleday, Garden City, NY, pp 167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J. (2005) Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1):96–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato.: 1903, Opera, Tomus III, J. Burnet (ed.) (Clarendon Press, Oxford)

  • Rawls J. (1971) A Theory of Justice Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R. (2006) Is Philosophy Relevant to Business Ethics? Business Ethics Quarterly 16:369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoda Y., Mischel W., Peake P. K. (1990) Predicting Adolescent Cognitive and Self-Regulatory Competencies from Preschool Delay of Gratification: Identifying Diagnostic Conditions. Developmental Psychology 26:978–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater L. (2004) Opening Skinner’s Box: Great Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981) The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211:453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez M. (2001) Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases 5 Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Werhane P. H. (1999), Moral Imagination and Management Decision-making Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S. (1971) Satisficing, Selection, and the Innovative Remnant. Quarterly Journal of Economics 85:237–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations. G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.) (MacMillan, New York)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stern School, New York University, Tisch Hall, 3rd Floor, 40 West 4th Street, New York, NY, 10012, USA

    Edwin M. Hartman

Authors
  1. Edwin M. Hartman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin M. Hartman.

Additional information

Edwin M. Hartman is the Peter Schoernfeld Visiting Faculty Fellow at the Stern School of New York University. He has degrees from Haverford, Oxford, and Wharton, and a PhD from Princeton. Hartman’s most recent book is Organizational Ethics and the Good Life (Oxford).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartman, E.M. Socratic Questions and Aristotelian Answers: A Virtue-Based Approach to Business Ethics. J Bus Ethics 78, 313–328 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9337-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9337-5

Key words:

Search

Navigation