Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovations, Stakeholders & Entrepreneurship

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In modern societies entrepreneurship and innovation are widely seen as key sources of economic growth and welfare increases. Yet entrepreneurial innovation has also meant losses and hardships for some members of society: it is destructive of some stakeholders’ wellbeing even as it creates new wellbeing among other stakeholders. Both the positive benefits and negative externalities of innovation are problematic because entrepreneurs initiate new ventures before their private profitability and/or social costs can be fully recognized. In this paper we consider three analytical frameworks within which these issues might be examined: pre-commitments, contractarianism, and an entrepreneurial framework. We conclude that the intersection of stakeholder theory and entrepreneurial innovation is a potentially rich arena for research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams J. J. 2002 Solution to the Problem of Induction: Peirce, Appel and Goodman on the Grue Paradox. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society XXXVIII 4:543–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J. H. and D. Simmons: 2003, Public Interest Comment on the OMB’s Draft 2003 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations (Mercatus Center, George Mason University). http://www.mercatus.org/

  • Akeroyd F. M. 1991 A Practical Example of Grue. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42(4):535–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. J. 1951 Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. J., Fisher A. C. 1974 Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty and Irreversibility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 88(2):312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, W. S.: 1999, Notes on a Utilitarian Justification of Rights: The Strategy of Pre-Commitment. Posted April 24, 1999. www.lawrence.edu/fac/boardman/rights_ precommt.html

  • Buchanan J. M. 1975 A Contractarian Paradigm for Applying Economic Thinking. American Economic Review 65(2):225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan J. M., Vanberg V. J. 1991 The Market as a Creative Process. Economics and Philosophy 7:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz R. A., Rosenthal S. B. 2005 The Spirit of Entrepreneurship and the Qualities of Moral Decision Making: Toward a Unifying Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 60(3): 307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H.: 1960, ‚The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics (3): 1–44

  • Dennett D. (1984) Cognitive Wheels: The Frame Problem of AI. In: C. Hookway (ed.) Minds, Machines and Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dew, N.: 2003, Lipsticks and Razorblades: How the Auto ID Center used Pre-commitments to build The Internet of Things. Dissertation (University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA)

  • Dew N., Velamuri S. R., Venkataraman S. 2004a Dispersed Knowledge and an Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm. Journal of Business Venturing 19(5): 659–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dew N., Sarasvathy S. D., Ventakaraman S. 2004b The Economic Implications of Exaptation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. 1984 Ulysees and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. 2000 Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment and Constraints. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin Y. 2005 The Reasons Behind Non-Ethical Behaviour in Business and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 60(3):265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. A. 1983 The Modularity of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. A. 1987 Modules, Frames, Fridgeons, Sleeping Dogs, and the Music of the Spheres. In: Pylyshyn Z. W. (Ed.) The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R. E. 1984 Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. New York: Pitman Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1994, `A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism', in T. L. Beauchamp and N. E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 66–76

  • Freeman R. E., Pierce J., Dodd R. 2000 Environmentalism and the New Logic of Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodie A. S. 2003 The Effects of Control on Betting: Paradoxical Betting on Items of High Confidence with Low Value. Journal of Experimental Psychology 29(4):598–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N. 1983 Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall J., Rosson P. 2006 The Impact of Technological Turbulence on Entrepreneurial Behavior, Social Norms and Ethics: Three Internet-based Cases. Journal of Business Ethics 64(3): 231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannafey F.T. (2003) Entrepreneurship and Ethics: A Literature Review. Journal of Business Ethics 46: 99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland J. (1987). An Overview of the Frame Problem. In: Z. Pylyshyn (ed.) The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. NY: Ablex

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T.: 2000, ‚Entrepreneurship and the Process of Obtaining Resource Commitments’, Working Paper (Stanford University, CA)

  • Hirschman A. O. 1970 Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas H. 1996 The Creativity of Action. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareev Y. 1995 Through a Narrow Window: Working Memory Capacity and the Detection of Covariation. Cognition 56:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee E. 2005 The Ethics of Innovation: p2p Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics 62(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lormand E. 1990. Framing the Frame Problem. Synthese 82(3):353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton S. 2005 Shared Quality Uncertainty and the Introduction of Indeterminate Goods. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29(3):399–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, P. and P. Hayes: 1969, `Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence', in B. Meltzer and D. Michie (eds.), Machine Intelligence 4 (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, Scotland)

  • Mokyr, J.: 1996, ‚Innovation and its Enemies’, Working Paper (Department of Economics, Northwestern University)

  • Rawls J. 1971 A Theory of Justice. New York: Belknap Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N.: 1996, ‚Uncertainty and Technological Change’, in J. C. Fuhrer and J. Sneddon Little (eds.), Technology and Growth: Conference Series No.40. (Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston)

  • Sah R. K., Stiglitz J. E. 1988 Committees, Hierarchies and Polyarchies. Economic Journal 98:451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M.: 1982, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge University Press)

  • Sarasvathy, S. D.: 1998, `How do firms come to be? Towards a theory of the prefirm', Dissertation (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA)

  • Sarasvathy S. D. 2001 Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency. Academy of Management Review 26(2):243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D.: 2006, Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise (Edward Elgar)

  • Sarasvathy S. D., Dew N. 2005a New Market Creation Through Transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 15: 533–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy S. D., Dew N. 2005b Toward a Technology of Foolishness: Alternative Logics Embodied in Entrepreneurial Action. Scandinavian Journal of Management 21(4):385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A. 1999b Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B. 2004 The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: 2004, The Frame Problem. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/frame-problem/Retrieved July 1, 2004

  • Sumner L. 1987 The Moral foundations of Rights. New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd P. M., Gigerenzer G. 2003 Bounding Rationality to the World. Journal of Economic Psychology 24:143–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B. 1997 Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness Administrative Science Quarterly 42:35–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove W., Dentchev N. A. 2005 A Network Perspective on Stakeholder Management: Facilitating Entrepreneurs in the Discovery of Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 60(3): 221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velamuri S. R., Venkataraman S. 2005 Why Stakeholder and Stockholder Theories are not Necessarily Contradictory: A Knightian Insight. Journal of Business Ethics 61(3): 249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, S.: 2002, ‚Stakeholder Value Equilibration and the Entrepreneurial Process’, Business Ethics Quarterly, Ruffin Series #3

  • Wempe J. 2005 Ethical Entrepreneurship and Fair Trade. Journal of Business Ethics 60(3): 211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane P. H. 1999 Moral Imagination and Management Decision-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiltbank, R., N. Dew, S. D. Sarasvathy and S. Read: 2006, ‚What To Do Next? The Case for Non-Predictive Strategies’, Strategic Management Journal 27(10), 981–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. 1996 Innovations, Externalities and the Problem of Economic Progress. Public Choice 89(1–2): 113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Naval Postgraduate School, 1 University Circle, 1 Dyer Place, Monterey, CA, 93943, U.S.A

    Nicholas Dew

  2. Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Virginia, PO Box 6550, Charlottesville, VA, 22906, U.S.A

    Saras D. Sarasvathy

Authors
  1. Nicholas Dew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saras D. Sarasvathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Dew.

Additional information

Nicholas Dew, Ph.D. is an assistant professor at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA. He teaches strategic management in private and public sector organizations. His research interests include entrepreneurship, strategy and innovation. He has published in several scholarly journals, including Strategic Management Journal, the Journal of Business Venturing, Industrial and Corporate Change and the Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

Saras D. Sarasvathy, Ph.D. is an associate professor at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration. She teaches courses in entrepreneurship and ethics in Darden's MBA and doctoral programs. Her research focuses on the cognitive basis for high-performance entrepreneurship. She has published in various scholarly journals, including the Academy of Management Review, Strategic Management Journal, the Journal of Businesss Venturing and the Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Her first book Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise was recently published by Edward Elgar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S.D. Innovations, Stakeholders & Entrepreneurship. J Bus Ethics 74, 267–283 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9234-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9234-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation