Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Satisfaction for Whom? Freedom for What? Theology and the Economic Theory of the Consumer

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The economic theory of the consumer, which assumes individual satisfaction as its goal and individual freedom to pursue satisfaction as its sine qua non, has become an important ideological element in political economy. Some have argued that the political dimension of economics has evolved into a kind of “secular theology” that legitimates free market capitalism, which has become a kind of “religion” in the United States [Nelson: 1991, Reaching for Heaven on Earth: The Theological Meaning of Economics. (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, Savage, Maryland); 2001, Economics as Religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond (The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania); Thurow: 1983, Dangerous Currents: The State of Economics (Random House, New York); Milbank: 1990, Theology and Social Theory, Beyond Secular Reason (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts)]. Consumer theory in its ideological form provides an important base for this religion and is no longer merely a positive framework for understanding consumer choice or estimating market demand. The paper explores the view of the human being, the “anthropology,” that is implicit in the economic theory of the consumer and compares its “theological” implications with the corresponding theological anthropologies in the Judaeo-Christian tradition. The paper outlines the assumptions of consumer theory and then focuses on three aspects of the theory from a critical theological perspective: the individual in community, property ownership, and human destiny (or “eschatology” in theological terminology). The principal conclusion is that consumer theory, viewed from this perspective, leads to a reductionist and existentially harmful view of human beings. The maximization of individual satisfaction raises genuine ethical issues when viewed as a political and religious value. The paper argues that the issues could be ameliorated if economists would include more explicit treatment of a social dimension and ethical alternatives in consumer theory and if theologians would give greater attention to economic theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow K. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila C. (1983) Ownership: Early Christian Teaching. Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W. J., Blinder A. S. (1997) Economics: Principles and Policy, Seventh edition. Dryden Press, Fort Worth, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Beabout GR et al. (2002) Beyond Self-Interest: A Personalist Approach to Human Action. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker G (1971) The Economics of Discrimination, Second Edition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker G. (1975) Human Capital. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker G. (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker G., Murphy K. (2001) Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug M. (1978) Economic Theory in Retrospect, Third edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, A. and P. Sedgwick: 2003, ‘Economic Theory␣and Christian Belief. (Peter Lang AG, European Academic Publishers, Bern, Switzerland)

  • Bullinger, E. W.: 1990, ‘The Use of Nephesh in the Old Testament,’ in The Companion Bible (Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids, MI)

  • Cone, J.: 1997, God of the Oppressed, Revised Edition (Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY)

  • Danby, H. (ed.): 1933, The Mishnah (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

  • Fine, B. (2002) The World of Consumption, Second edition. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1955) Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility. The Journal of Political Economy 63(4):309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J. M., Quandt R. E. (1980) Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach, Third edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson B. (1983) Economic Science and Ethical Neutrality: The Problem of Teleology. Journal of Business Ethics 2(4):237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson B. (2001) Economics as Moral Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, T.: No date, “Nephesh and the Fulfillment It Receives as Psyche,” http://www.drhoff.com/Writings/writings.htm. Accessed May 3, 2005

  • Holy Bible, New Revised Standard Version: 1989 (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

  • Jewish Publication Society (1988) Tanakh, The Holy Scriptures, The New JPS Translation. The Jewish Publication Society, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • John Paul II: 1981, ‘Encyclical Laborem Exercens’

  • John Paul II: 1987, ‘Encyclical Solicitudo Rei Socialis’

  • John Paul II: 1991, ‘Encyclical Centesimus Annus’

  • Koutsoyiannis A. (1979) Modern Microeconomics, Second edition. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo XIII: 1891 ‘Encyclical Rerum Novarum’

  • Leo XIII: 1897: ‘Encyclical Divinum Illud’

  • Long D. S. (2000) Divine Economy: Theology and the Market. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A. (1988) Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Notre Dame. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN)

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., Simon H. A. (1958) Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry J (1999) Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market As An Ethical System. Garamond and Kumarian Press, Toronto and Westport CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbank J. (1990) Theology and Social Theory, Beyond Secular Reason. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller V. J. (2004) Consuming Religion, Christian Faith and Practice in a Consumer Culture. The Continuum International Publishing Group, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann J. (1996) The Coming of God, Translated by Margaret Kohl. Fortress Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R. H. (1991) Reaching for Heaven on Earth: The Theological Meaning of Economics. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, Savage, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. H.: 1998, ‘Economic Religion Versus Christian Values,’ Journal of Markets & Morality, 1(2)

  • Nelson, R. H.: 2001, Economics as Religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Neusner, J.: 1999, The Transformation of Economic Thinking in Classical Judaism. In: Jacob Neusner (eds) Religious Belief and Economic Behavior. Scholars Press, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, W. (1978) Microeconomic Theory, Basic Principles and Extensions, Second edition. The Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, M. (1983) The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, M. (1993) The Catholic Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohrenstein, R. A., Gordon B. (1992) Economic Analysis in Talmudic Literature: Rabbinic Thought in the Light of Modern Economics. E.J. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Pius XI: 1931, ‘Encyclical Quadragesimo Anno’

  • Pius XII: 1943, ‘Encyclical Mystici Corporis’

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. W. (1964) Corporate Personality in Ancient Israel, Facet Books Biblical Series – 11. Fortress Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, L. (2005) “Foundations of Human Sociality: A Review Essay. Journal of Economic Literature 43:488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelli A. J. Jr. et al. (2002) The Free Person and the Free Economy. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A.: 1980, History of Economic Analysis, in Elizabeth Boody Schumpeter (ed.) (Oxford University Press: New York)

  • Sen, A.: (1973) Behavior and the Concept of Preference. Economica, New Series 40(159):241–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1969) Quasi-Transitivity, Rational Choice and Collective Decisions. Review of Economic Studies 36(3):381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1977) Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4):317–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1987) On Ethics and Economics. Basil Blackwell Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1995) Rationality and Social Choice. American Economic Review 85(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 1999, The Possibility of Social Choice. American Economic Review 89(3):349–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1976, ‘Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization’, 3rd edn, Expanded with a New Introduction (The Free Press, New York)

  • Simons R. G. (1995) Competing Gospels: Public Theology and Economic Theory Alexandria NSW. E.J. Dwyer, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Augustine: 1997, On Christian Teaching, Translated with an Introduction and Notes by R.P.H. Green (Oxford University Press, Oxford)

  • St. Augustine: 1960, The Confessions of Saint Augustine, Translated, with an Introduction and Notes by John K. Ryan (Doubleday, New York)

  • St. Thomas Aquinas: 1947, The Summa Theologica’, Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Benziger Bros. edition, http://www.ccel.org/a/aquinas/summa/home/html, Accessed May 4, 2005

  • Thurow L. C. (1983) Dangerous Currents: The State of Economics. Random House, New YorkZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich P. (1951) Systematic Theology, Volume One: Reason and Revelation, Being and God. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers D. (1997a) Economics and the Antagonism of Time: Time, Uncertainty, and Choice in Economic Theory. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers D. (1997b) Economics and Ethics: An Introduction to Theory, Institutions, and Policy. Praeger Publishers, Westport, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian HR (1990) Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, Second edition. W.W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Rad, G.: 1962, ‘Old Testament Theology, Volume 1: The Theology of Israel’s Historical Traditions’, Translated by D.M.G. Stalker (Harper & Row, New York)

  • Wojtyla, K.: 1979, The Acting Person, Translated by A. Potocki. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands)

  • Wojtyla, K.: 1993, ‘The Person: Subject and Community,’ in Person and Community: Selected Essays, Translated by Theresa Sandok, O. S. M. (Peter Lang, New York)

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to Michael E. Lee and Bradford E. Hinze of Fordham University, Christine Firer Hinze of Marquette University, and John Weber and Ann Tenbrunsel of the Mendoza School of Business at the University of Notre Dame for helpful comments on an initial draft of this paper. Of course, the responsibility for any shortcomings of this paper and for the opinions expressed in it is entirely mine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Theology, Fordham University, 441 E. Fordham Road, Bronx, NY, 10458-9993, U.S.A.

    Mark G. Nixon

Authors
  1. Mark G. Nixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark G. Nixon.

Additional information

Mark Nixon (mnixon@fordham.edu) is a doctoral student in theology and coordinator of the Master of Arts in Humanities & Sciences Program at Fordham University, with research interests in postmodern theology, social theory, and ethics. He received his B.A. (Religion) from Oberlin College, his M.B.A. and M.A. (Political Economy) from Stanford University, and his M.A. (Theology) from Fordham University. He has also completed the course requirements for the Ph.D. (Economics) at The George Washington University. His business career included more than 20 years with IBM where he held staff, management and executive positions, including several years as director of IBM’s Advanced Business Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nixon, M.G. Satisfaction for Whom? Freedom for What? Theology and the Economic Theory of the Consumer. J Bus Ethics 70, 39–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9078-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9078-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation