Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Role Performance of Corporate Ethics Officers

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizations continue to show renewed focus on managing their ethics programs by developing organizational infrastructures to support their ethics implementation efforts. An important part of this process has been the creation of an ethics officer position. Whether individuals appointed to the position are successful in the role or not may depend on a number of factors. This study presents a suggested framework for their effectiveness. The framework includes a focus on personal, organizational and situational factors to predict performance in the role. The study examines the complex nature of the role. These include task complexity, low task visibility, role conflict, and role ambiguity. Personal, organizational and situational factors that can serve as buffers against the complexities associated with the role are presented. The study suggests that individuals with certain competencies and orientations may be better suitable for the ethics position, and firms need to consider key organizational and situational issues critical to the performance of an ethics officer. The research and practice implications of the study are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I. and Fishbein M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood, NJ, Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Management Association: 1999, Lip Service Ethics Programs Prove Ineffective, Management Review June 9, 1

  • Anderson C. R. and Schneier C. E. (1978). Locus Of Control, Leader Behavior, and Leader Performance Among Management Students. Academy of Management Journal 21:690–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin N. (1994). The New Corporate Watchdogs. Working Woman 19(1):19–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber A. E., Roehling M. V. (1993). Job posting and the decision to interview: A verbal protocol analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 78:845–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry M. (2002). Why Ethics and Compliance Programs Fail. The Journal of Business Strategy 23(6):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels L., Harrick E., Martell K. and Strickland D. (1998). The Relationship Between Ethical Climate and Ethical Problems Within Human Resources Management. Journal of Business Ethics 17:799–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Budner S. (1962). Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable. Journal of Personality 30:29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns J. M.(1978). Leadership. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell D. F. and O’ Reilly C. A. (1985). The Impact of Information on Job Choices and Turnover. Academy of Management Journal 28:934–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D. J. (1988). Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis. Academy of Management Review 13(1):40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter M. A. and Golden B. R. (1997). Perceived Managerial Discretion: A Study of Cause and Effect. Strategic Management Journal 18(3):187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss M. J., Garner R. (1996). Do Adults Change their Minds After Reading Persuasive Texts? Written Communication 13(3):291–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Church A. H., Waclawski J. (1998). The Relationship between Individual Personality Orientation and Executive Leadership Behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 71:9–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis W. L. and Phares E. J. (1967). Internal–External Control as a Determinant of Information Seeking in a Social Influence Situation. Journal of Personality 35:547–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M. (1994). Constructive Conflict Resolution: Principles, Training and Research. Journal of Social Issues 50:13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiPiazza S. A. (2001). The Value of the Corporate Ethics Officer: Musing from the “Other” CEO. Vital Speeches of the Day. Sept 15:712–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethics Officer Association: 2004, (http://www.eoa.org)

  • Ferrell O. C., Fraedrich J., Ferrell L. (2005). Business Ethics. 6th Edition. New York, Houghton Mifflin

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein S. and Hambrick D. C. (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations. West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn F. J., Chatman J. A., Spataro S. E. (2001). Getting to Know You: The Influence of Personality on Impressions and Performance of Demographically Different People in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 46:414–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham A. and Sprinfield M. (1986). Personality and Work Performance: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Correlates of Managerial Performance in Two Cultures. Personality and Individual Differences 14:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover S. L. (1993). Lying, Deceit, and Subterfuge: A Model of Dishonesty in the Workplace. Organization Science 4(3):478–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman R., and Oldham G. (1976). Motivation Through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16:250–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy C. (1993). Understanding Organizations, 4th ed. Penguin, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, H. J.: 1997, Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic and Post-modern Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson G. F. (1992). Research Notes and Communications: Development and Validation of the Strategic Locus of Control Scale. Strategic Management Journal 13:311–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell J. M., Higgins C. A. (1990). Champions of Technological Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 317–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund: 2000, IMF Ethics Officer-Terms of Reference, February 28, (http://www.imf.org/external/hrd/eo.htlm).

  • Izraeli D. and BarNir A. (1998). Promoting Ethics Through Ethics Officers: A Proposed Profile and an Application. Journal of Business Ethics 17:1189–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones G. R. (1984). Task Visibility, Free Riding, and Shirking: Explaining the Effect of Structure and Technology on Employee Behavior. Academy of Management Review 9(4):684–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose A. and Thibodeaux M. S. (1999). Institutionalization of Ethics: The Perspective of Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 22(2):133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn R. L., Wolf D., Quinn R., Snoek D. J., Rosenthal R. (1964). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo R. N. and Mendonca M. (1996). Ethical Dimensions of Leadership. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz D. and Kahn R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (Second Edition). John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J., Gable M., Hise R. T. (1981). Satisfaction in Chain Store Manager Roles. Journal of Retailing 57(1):27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1981). The Philosophy of Moral Development. Harper and Row, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnert K. W. and Russell C. J. (1990). Using Constructive Developmental Theory and Biodata to Bridge the Gap between Personnel Selection and Leadership. Journal of Management 16:595–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin A. Y., Stephens C. U. (1994). CEO Attitudes as Determinants of Organization Design: An Integrated Model. Organization Studies 15(2):183–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis M. R.(1980). Surprise and Sense Making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly 25:226–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord R. G., DeVader C. L., Alliger G. M. (1986). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Personality Traits and Leadership Perceptions: An Application of Validity Generalization Procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology 71:402–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzzo D., Ward B. (1995). The Relatively Contributions of Self-efficacy and the Locus of Control to the Production of Vocational Congruence. Journal of Career Development 21(4):307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J., Simon H.(1958). Organizations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall M. W., Jr. (1994). Identifying Leadership Potential in Future International Executives: Developing a Concept. Consulting Psychology Journal 46:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonca M.(2001). Preparing for Ethical Leadership in Organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 18 (4):266–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D., Toulouse J. M. (1986). Chief Executive Personality and Corporate Strategy in Small Firms. Management Science 32:1389–1409

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D., Kets de Vries M. F.R., Toulouse M.(1982). Top Executive Locus of Control and its Relationship to Strategy Making, Structure, and Environment. Academy of Management Journal 25:237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller G. R. (1980). On Being Persuaded: Some Basic Distinction. In: Roloff M. E. and Miller G. R. (eds), Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications, pp. 11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell T. R., Smyser C. M. and Weed S. E. (1975). Locus of Control: Supervision and Work Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal 18:623–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy P. K., Alexander P. A. (2004). Persuasion as a Dynamic, Multidimensional Process: An Investigation of Individual and Intraindividual Differences. American Educational Research Journal 41(2):337–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Northhouse P. G. (2001). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T. (1951). The Social System. The Free Press, Glencoe, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry E. and Tietz F. (1992). Can Ethics Officers Improve Office Ethics?. Business and Society Review 82:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter L. W., Allen R. W., Angle H. L. (1981). The Politics of Upward Influence In Organizations. In: Barry S. and Larry C. (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior 3. Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, pp. 109–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo J. R., House R.J and Lirtzman S. I. (1970). Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 25:150–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B.: 1966, ‘Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 369–382. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–27

  • Snyder M. B. and Copeland J. (1989). Self-Monitoring Process in Organizational Settings. In: Guacamole R. A. and Rosenfeld P. (eds) Impression Management in Organizations. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector P. E. (1982). Behavior in Organizations as a Function of Employee’s Locus Of Control. Psychological Bulletin 91:482–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer G. M., McCall M. W., Jr. and Mahoney J. D. (1997). Early Identification of International Executive Potential. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(1):6–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann D. (1976). The Effect of Cognitive Feedback and Task Complexity in Multi-Cue Probability Learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 15:168–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill, R. M., O. S. Goode and D. R. Day: 1965, The Leader Behavior of University Presidents’, Unpublished report, (Ohio University Bureau of Business Research, Columbus, OH)

  • Sutherland E. (1949). White Collar Crime. Dryden, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh H. P., Foo S. L. (1997). Moderating Effects of Tolerance for Ambiguity and Risk Taking Propensity on the Role Conflict-Perceived Performance Relationship: Evidence from Singaporean Entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 12: 67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Hartman L. P., Brown M. (2000). Moral Person and Moral Manager: How Executives Develop Reputation for Ethical Leadership. California Management Review 42(4):128–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. (1986). Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11:601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, B. W.: 1966, ‘Integrative Complexity: Its Measurement and Relation to Creativity’, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 369–382

  • Victor B. and Cullen J. (1988) The Organizational Basis of Ethical Work Climates. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 101–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous J. P., Colella A. (1989). Organizational Entry Research: Current Status and Future Research Directions. In: Rowland K. M. and Ferris G. R. (eds) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 7. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 59–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruffe C. (1993). What is Meant by Complacency?. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 14:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, School of Business, Quinnipiac University, 275 Mount Carmel Avenue, Hamden, CT, 06518, USA

    Henry Adobor

Authors
  1. Henry Adobor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Adobor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adobor, H. Exploring the Role Performance of Corporate Ethics Officers. J Bus Ethics 69, 57–75 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9068-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9068-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation