Abstract
In the context of change to the “new modernity” described in Beck’s work, companies develop management modes and methods that focus more and more on individuals. Constitutive of the individualization process, human resources practices have become ambivalent as the process itself. This contribution examines how a managerial and organizational innovation as telework contributes to the process of individualization, and the paradoxes it addresses to management. At the interface of the social and the technical, teleworking appears as a flexible arrangement, meeting employees’ and employer’s demands – which is a characteristic of the process of individualization – by simultaneously fragmenting collectivity, exposing individuals to social risk, and producing exclusion. The authors focus on two consecutive paradoxes of such individualized managerial practices: the individual–collective dilemma and the autonomy–control paradox. Finally, the paper reveals HRM as a new institution of individualization in a world where regulation functions are more and more transferred to individuals themselves.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. G. Allen R. W. Renn R. W. Griffeth (2003) ArticleTitleThe Impact of Telecommuting Design on Social Systems, Self-regulation, and Role Boundaries Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 22 125–163 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22003-X
D. E. Bailey N. B. Kurland (2002) ArticleTitleA Review of Telework Research: Findings, New Directions, and Lessons for the Study of Modern Work Journal of Organizational Behavior 23 383–400
Y. Baruch (2000) ArticleTitleTeleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as␣perceived by professionals and managers New Technology, Work and Employment 15 IssueID1 34–49 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-005X.00063
Y. Baruch N. Nicholson (1997) ArticleTitleHome, Sweet Home: Requirements for Effective Home Working Journal of General Management 23 IssueID2 15–30
Beffa, J. L., Boyer, R. and J. P. Touffut: 1999, ‘Les relations salariales en France: Etat, entreprises, marchés financiers’, Notes de la Fondation Saint-Simon 107.
U. Beck E. Beck-Gernsheim (2001) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences Sage London
F. Bélanger (1999) ArticleTitleWorkers’ Propensity to Telecommute: An Empirical Study” Information & Management 35 139–153
T. Breton (1994) Le télétravail en France: Situation actuelle, perspectives de développement et aspects juridiques La Documentation Française Paris
Bridoux, F. and L. Taskin: 2005, ‘Telework: Challenge to knowledge creation and transfer in a knowledge- and technology-based century’, Proceedings of the Academy of Management Annual Conference, Honolulu (Hawaii), August 5–10.
Cocula, F. and A. Frédy-Planchot: 2000, ‘Freins et motivations liés au télétravail chez Électricité de France et Gaz de France: l’apport de la théorie de la structuration’, in D. Autissier, and F. Wacheux (dir.), Structuration et management des organisations. Gestion de l’action et du changement dans les entreprises (L’Harmattan, Paris).
C. Dambrin (2004) ArticleTitleHow does telework influence the manager–employee relationship? International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management 4 IssueID4 358 Occurrence Handle10.1504/IJHRDM.2004.005044
K. Daniels D. Lamond P. Standen (2001) ArticleTitleTeleworking: Frameworks for Organizational Research Journal of Management Studies 38 IssueID8 1151–1185 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-6486.00276
F Dany (2002) ArticleTitle‘L’individu ou l’organisation: Qui gère réellement la carrière des cadres?’ Revue Française de Gestion 28 IssueID137 9–26
S. Deffayet (2002) ArticleTitleNouvelles technologies de l’information et de la communication et contrôle dans la relation managériale Recherches sociologiques 1 27–48
V. Devos L. Taskin (2005) ArticleTitle‘Entre individualisation et autonomie contrôlée, Gestion par les compétences et nouvelles formes d’organisation du temps et de l’espace’ Revue française de Gestion 31 IssueID156 93–104
Devos, V. and Léonard, E.: 2002, ‘Logique compétence: modernisation ou illusion?’, in B. Fusulier, C. Lomba and J. Vandewattyne (eds.), Kaléïdoscopie d’une modernisation industrielles. (PUL, LLN).
D. Dimitrova (2003) ArticleTitle“Controlling Teleworkers: Supervision and Flexibility Revisited”’ New Technology, Work and Employment 18 IssueID3 181–195 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-005X.00120
El Akremi, A.: 2005, ‘La flexibilitéest-elle une source d’avantage concurrentiel?’ in M. de Nanteuil-Miribel and A. El Akremi (dir), La société flexible (Eres, Paris) pp. 213–243.
InstitutionalAuthorNameEmpirica (2000) ECATT, Telework Data Report (population survey) Report for the European Commission Empirica Bonn
Empirica: 2003, SIBIS report No. 5: work, employment and skills, SIBIS (Statistical Indicators Benchmarking the Information Society). (European Commission, Brussels).
Emergence: 2002, Estimation and mapping of employment relocation in a global economy in the new communication environment, http://www.emergence.nu
D. C. Feldman T. W. Gainey (1997) ArticleTitlePatterns of Telecommuting and their Consequences: Framing the Research Agenda Human Resource Management Review 7 369–388 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90025-5
A. Felstead N. Jewson S. Walters (2003) ArticleTitleManagerial Control of Employees Working at Home British Journal of Industrial Relations 41 IssueID2 241–264 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8543.00271
B. Galambaud (2001) Si la GRH était de la gestion Liaisons Paris
B. Galambaud (1988) L’initiative contrôlée ou le nouvel art du manager EME Paris
A. Giddens (1992) The Consequences of Modernity Polity Press Cambridge
M. Gollac S. Volkoff (1996) ArticleTitle‘Citius, altius, fortius, l’intensification du travail’ Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 114 54–67
M. Gollac S. Volkoff (2000) L Les conditions de travail La Découverte Paris
S. Hamon-Cholet C. Rougerie (2000) ArticleTitleLa charge mentale au travail: Des enjeux complexes pour les salariés Economie et Statistique 339–340 243–255
L. Harris (2003) ArticleTitleHome-based Teleworking and the Employment Relationship, Managerial Challenges and Dilemmas Personnel Review 32 IssueID4 422–437 Occurrence Handle10.1108/00483480310477515
P. J. Jackson J. M. Wielen Particlevan der (1998) Actors, Approaches and Agendas: From Telecommuting to the Virtual Organisation P. J. Jackson J. M. Wielen Particlevan der (Eds) Teleworking: International Perspectives Routledge London 1–18
U. Konradt G. Hertel R. Schmoock (2003) ArticleTitleQuality of Management by Objectives, Task-related Stressors, and Non-task-related Stressors as Predictors of Stress and Job Satisfaction among Teleworkers European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 12 IssueID1 61–79 Occurrence Handle10.1080/13594320344000020
M. Lallement (2001) ArticleTitleDaedalus laborans Revue du Mauss semestrielle 18 IssueID2 29–49
S. Lash (2001) Individualizaion in a non-linear mode U. Beck E. Beck-Gernsheim (Eds) Individualizaion: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. Sage London vii–xiii
J. P. Goff ParticleLe (2000) Les illusions du management, Pour le retour du bon sens La Découverte Paris
M. Lindorff (2000) ArticleTitleHome-based telework and telecommuting in Australia: More myth than modern work form Asia pacific journal of human resources 38 IssueID3 1–11
P. Louart (1994) ArticleTitleLa GRH à l‘heure des segmentations et␣des particularismes Revue française de Gestion 20 IssueID98 79–94
S. Mann L. Holdsworth (2003) ArticleTitleThe Psychological Impact of Telework: Stress, Emotions and Health New Technology, Work and Employment 18 IssueID3 196–211 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-005X.00121
C.C. Manz G.L. Stewart (1997) ArticleTitle‘Attaining Flexible Stability by Integrating Total Quality Management and Socio-technical Systems Theory’ Organization Science 8 IssueID1 59–70 Occurrence Handle10.1287/orsc.8.1.59
G. Musson S. Tietze (2004) ArticleTitleFeeling Groovy: Appropriating Time in Home Based Telework Culture and Organisation 10 IssueID3 251–264
Nonaka, I.: 1991, ‘The knowledge-creating company’, Harvard Business Review, November–December, 96–104.
I. Nonaka H. Takeuchi K. Umemoto (1996) ArticleTitleA Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation International Journal of Technology Management 11 IssueID7–8 820–833
Oiry, E.: 2000, ‘Management et outils de gestion: L’exemple du paradoxe individualisation versus coopération’, Proceedings of the 2nd Easter University of IAS, Marrakech (Morocco), 4–6 mai, pp. 149–158
M. Pagès M. Bonneti V. Gaulejac Particlede D. Descendre (1998) L’emprise de l’organisation (5ème éd.) Desclée de Brouwer Paris
P. Peters K. G. Tijdens C. Wetzels (2004) ArticleTitleEmployees’ Opportunities, Preferences, and Practices in Telecommuting Adoption Information & Management 41 469–482 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00085-5
M. S. Poole A. H. Vande Ven (1989) ArticleTitleUsing Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories Academy of Management Review 14 IssueID4 562–578
C. K. Prahalad G. Hamel (1990) ArticleTitleThe Core Competence of the Corporation Harvard Business Review 68 IssueID3 79–91
Schots, M. and L. Taskin: 2005, ‘Flexible Working Times: towards a New Employment Relationship?’, Paper presented at the fourth International Conference on Critical Management Studies, Cambridge, 4–6 July.
Servais, O.: 1989, ‘Les enjeux de l’individualisation des salaires’, Revue Française de Gestion, March–April–May, pp. 5–14.
J. Storey (1989) New Perspectives on Human Resource Management Routledge London
Stroobants, M.: 1994, ‘La mutation au service du système productif ’, in Les mutations du système productif, Enjeux des compétences et de la formation, Dossier No. 15, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut des Sciences du Travail, pp. 61–82.
Taskin, L. and M. Schots: 2005, ‘Flexibilité temporelle et relation d’emploi’, Economies et Sociétés (forthcoming)
Taskin, L. and P. Vendramin: 2004, Le télétravail, une vague silencieuse. Enjeux socio-économiques d’une nouvelle flexibilité. (Louvain-la-Neuve, PUL coll. e-Management).
M. Thévenet (1999) ArticleTitle‘Le retour du travail et la fin de la gestion des ressources humaines’ Revue française de gestion 25 IssueID126 5–11
P. Veltz (2000) Le nouveau monde industriel Gallimard Paris
P. Vendramin (2004) Le travail au singulier: Le lien social à l’épreuve de l’individualisation Bruylant-Academia, L’Harmattan Louvain-la-Neuve
P. Vendramin G. Valenduc (2002) Technologies et flexibilité, Les défis du travail à l’ère numérique Liaisons Paris
M. Walrave M. Bie ParticleDe (2005) Teleworking at Home or Close to Home, Results Report Antwerp UA
K. E. Weick (1989) ArticleTitleTheory Construction as Disciplined Imagination Academy of Management Review 14 IssueID4 516–531
P. Zarifian (2001) Le modèle de la compétence Liaisons Paris
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taskin, L., Devos, V. Paradoxes from the Individualization of Human Resource Management: The Case of Telework. J Bus Ethics 62, 13–24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-8710-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-8710-0