Abstract
Efforts to promote corporate social and environmental accountability (SEA) should be informed by an understanding of stakeholders’ attitudes toward enhanced accountability standards. However, little is known about current attitudes on this subject, or the determinants of these attitudes. To address this issue, this study examines the relationship between personal values and support for social and environmental accountability for a sample of experienced MBA students. Exploratory factor analysis of the items comprising our measure of support for SEA revealed two distinct factors: (1) endorsement of the general proposition that corporations and executives should be held accountable for the social and environmental impacts of their actions; and (2) agreement that the government should adopt and enforce formal SEA standards. Our findings indicate that the universalism value type is positively associated with general support for SEA, but not with support for government enforcement of accountability standards. In addition, we found that gender has a significant impact on support for government enforcement of SEA standards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axinn C. N., Blair M. E., Heorhiadi A. and Thach S. V. (2004). Comparing Ethical Ideologies Across Cultures. Journal of Business Ethics 54: 103–119
Beggs J. M. and Lane M. S. (1989). Corporate Goal Structures and Business Students: A Comparative Study of Values. Journal of Business Ethics 8: 471–478
Benton R. (1994). Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes of Undergraduate Business Students Compared to Non-business Students. Business & Society 33: 191–211
Canadian Democracy and Corporate Accountability Commission (CDCAC): 2002, The New Balance Sheet: Corporate Profits and Responsibility in the 21st Century, available at http://www.corporate-accountability.ca
Corporate Sunshine Working Group: 2003, Proposed Expanded SEC Disclosure Schedule, available at http://www.corporatesunshine.org/proposedisclosure.pdf.
Dunlap R. E. and Liere K. (1978). The New Environmental Paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education 9: 10–19
Dunlap R. E. and Liere K. (1984). Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality. Social Science Quarterly 65: 1013–1028
Dunlap R., Mertig A., Howell R. and Liere K. (1992). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 425–442
England G. W. (1967). Personal Value Systems of American Managers. Academy of Management Journal 10: 53–68
Ferrell O. and Gresham L. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49: 87–96
Friends of the Earth: 2002, Press release: New bill calls for corporate responsibility. Available at http://www.foe. co.uk/resource/press releases/20020612123459.html.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2002, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, available at http://www.globalreporting.org.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2003, Organisations Using the Guidelines, available at http://www.globalreporting.org/guidelines/companies.asp.
Heberlein T. A. (1972). The Land Ethic Realized: Some Social Psychological Explanations for Changing Environmental Attitudes. Journal of Social Issues 28(4): 79–87
Heberlein T. A. and Black J. S. (1976). Attitudinal Specificity and the Prediction of Behavior in a Field Setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33: 474–479
Hofstede G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hofstede G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA
Hunt S. and Vitell S. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6: 5–16
Hunt S. and Vitell S. (1991). The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Retrospective and Revision. In: Smith, N. C. and Guelch, J. A. (eds) Ethics in Marketing, pp. Irwin, Homewood, IL
Jones T. M. and Gautschi F. H. (1988). Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives. Journal of Business Ethics 7: 231–248
Kilbourne W. E., Beckmann S. C., Lewis A. and Dam Y. (2001). A Multinational Examination of the Role of the Dominant Social Paradigm in Environmental Attitudes of University Students. Environment and Behavior 33(2): 209–228
Kilbourne W. E., Beckmann S. C. and Thelen E. (2002). The Role of the Dominant Social Paradigm in Environmental Attitudes: A Multinational Examination. Journal of Business Research 55: 193–204
Kraft K. L. (1991). The Relative Importance of Social Responsibility in Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Student Responses. Journal of Business Ethics 10: 179–188
Kraft K. L. and Singhapakdi A. (1991). The Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility in Achieving Organizational Effectiveness: Students vs. Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 10: 679–686
Kraft K. L. and Singhapakdi A. (1995). The Relative Importance of Social Responsibility in Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Students Responses II. Journal of Business Ethics 14: 314–326
Learned E. P., Dooley A. R. and Katz R. L. (1959). Personal Values and Business Decisions. Harvard Business Review 37: 111–120
Ball-Rokeach S. J., Loges W. E. and Mayton D. M. (1994). Human Values and Social Issues: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues 50: 1–8
Merchant C. (1992). Radical Ecology. Routledge, New York
Milbrath L. W. (1984). Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
Rokeach M. J. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
Rokeach M. J. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. The Free Press, New York
Schultz P. W. (2001). The Structure of Environmental Concern: Concern for Self, Other People and the Biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 1–13
Schultz P. W. and Zelezny L. (1999). Values as Predictors of Environmental Attitudes: Evidence for Consistency across 14 Countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 255–265
Schwartz S. H. (1992). ‘Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries’. In: Azzna, M. (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. Academic Press, Boston, MA
Schwartz S. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?. Journal of Social Issues 50(4): 19–45
Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1994, ‘Ethical Ideologies of Future Marketers: The Relative Influences of Machiavellianism and Gender’, Journal of Marketing Education Spring, 34–42
Stern P. C. and Dietz T. (1994). The Value Basis of Environmental Concern. Journal of Social Issues 50: 65–84
Stern P. C., Dietz T., Kalof L. and Guagnano G. A. (1995). Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation toward Emergent Attitude Objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25: 1611–1636
Thompson S. C. G. and Barton M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes toward the Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14: 149–157
Tokar B. (1999). Earth for Sale: Reclaiming Ecology in the Age of Corporate Greenwash. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Verschoor, C. C.: 2002, ‘Canadian Study Shows Wide Support for Corporate Responsibility’, Strategic Finance April, 20–22
World Resources Institute and Aspen Institute: 2001, Beyond Grey Pinstripes, available at http://www. beyondgreypinstripes.org.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fukukawa, K., Shafer, W.E. & Lee, G.M. Values and Attitudes Toward Social and Environmental Accountability: a Study of MBA Students. J Bus Ethics 71, 381–394 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3893-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3893-y