Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

HRM Role in EEO: Sheep in Shepherd’s Clothing?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite a plethora of laws prohibiting discrimination in employment, supporting and enforcing equal employment opportunity (EEO) principles has proven to be an enormous challenge for those charged with this responsibility. The question often asked is who should exercise this role in organizations. Not surprisingly, there has been a call for HRM to become the guardian of EEO in organizations but should human resource managers be male or female, and/or would line managers be better positioned to assume this responsibility? This paper overviews the literature and then summarizes an empirical study that attempted to address the possible impact of these options as they exist in organizations. One hundred and eighty respondents who met the criterion of having interviewed one or more job applicants in the previous 6 months were systematically selected from business telephone listings. Based on self-reported behaviors, no significant difference was found between the expected and actual distributions of HR and line managers in respect to whether decisions were made on unlawful grounds. The percentage of each respondent category that asked unlawful questions varied from 1% to 36% depending upon the attribute (unlawful ground of discrimination) under consideration. This begs the question as to what value HR managers contribute to EEO in the selection process. The second finding was that significantly less female managers admit to making decisions on the basis of unlawful questions than male managers. Thus, support was found for female line managers as guardians of EEO but no clear justification for HRM in this role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HRM:

human resource management

EEO:

equal employment opportunity

AA:

affirmative action

References

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (1997) Small Business ABS Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (1999) Labour Force ABS Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Arvy G. Renz (1992) ArticleTitle‘Learning From an Ethics Workshop in an MBA Programme’ Journal of Business Ethics 11, 331–340

    Google Scholar 

  • J. N. Baron D. M. Kreps (1999) Strategic Human Resources Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Becker B. Gerhart (1996) ArticleTitle‘The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance’ Academy of Management Journal 39 IssueID4 779–803

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bennington (2001) ‘Age and Carer Discrimination in the Recruitment Process: Has the Australian Legislation Failed?’’ M. Noon E. Ogbonna (Eds) Equality, Diversity and Disadvantage in Employment Palgrave Houndmills, Basingstoke 65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Bennington R. Wein (2000a) ArticleTitle‘Anti-discrimination Legislation in Australia: Fair, Effective, Efficient or Irrelevant?’ International Journal of Manpower 21 IssueID1 21–33 Occurrence Handle10.1108/01437720010319435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennington, L. and R. Wein: 2000b, ‘Job Applicants – Sometimes they Name, Infrequently they Blame and Rarely they Claim’, in R. Dunford (ed.), ANZAM 2000 Conference Proceedings (Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Sydney, 3–6 December).

  • M. Betz L. O’Connell J. Shepard (1989) ArticleTitle‘Gender Differences on Proclivity for Unethical Behavior’ Journal of Business Ethics 8 321–324 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00381722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. F. Cascio (1998) Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Cassell (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Business Case for Equal Opportunities: Implications for Women in Management’ Women in Management Review 12 IssueID1 11–17 Occurrence Handle10.1108/09649429710162893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Cattaneo M. Reavley A. Templer (1994) ArticleTitle‘Women in Management as a Strategic HR Initiative’ Women in Management Review 9 IssueID2 23–28 Occurrence Handle10.1108/09649429410057631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. H. Church J. J. Waclawski (2001) ArticleTitle‘Hold the Line: An Examination of Line vs. Staff Differences’ Human Resource Management 40 IssueID1 21–34 Occurrence Handle10.1002/hrm.4013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Collinson M. Collinson (1996) ArticleTitle‘Barriers to Employee Rights: Gender, Selection, and the Labor Process’ Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 9 IssueID3 229–249

    Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Collinson J. Hearn (1994) ArticleTitle‘Naming Men as Men: Implications for Work, Organization and Management’ Gender, Work and Organization 1 IssueID1 2–22

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Cornelius (1999) Human Resource Management: A Managerial Perspective International Thomson Business Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • F. J. Crosby A. Putfall R. C. Snyder M. O’Connell P. Whalen (1989) ‘The Denial of Personal Disadvantage Among You, Me, and All the Other Ostriches’ M. Crawford M. Gentry (Eds) Gender and Thought: Psychological Perspectives Springer-Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Dickens (1999) ArticleTitle‘Beyond the Business Case: A Three-pronged Approach to Equality Action’ Human Resource Management Journal 9 IssueID1 9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Eisenstat (1996) ArticleTitle‘What Corporate Human Resources Brings to the Picnic: Four Models for Functional Management’ Organizational Dynamics 25 IssueID2 6–14 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-2616(96)90022-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. L. F. Felstiner R. L. Abel A. Sarat (1981) ArticleTitle‘The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming...’ Law and Society Review 15 IssueID3–4 631–654

    Google Scholar 

  • C. R. Fine R. W. Schupp (2002) ArticleTitle‘Liability Exposure Trends in Recruitment: An Assessment and Analysis of Retail Employment Applications’ Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 14 IssueID4 135–143 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021137321006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. C. Galang G. R. Ferris (1997) ArticleTitle‘Human Resource Department Power and Influence Through Symbolic Action’ Human Relations 50 IssueID11 1403–1426

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Galea B. Wright (1999) ArticleTitle‘Sex Roles and Justice: A Study of Gender as a Predictor of Fairness in Decision Making’ Women in Management Review 14 IssueID3/4 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Gibb (2000) ArticleTitle‘Evaluating HRM Effectiveness: The Stereotype Connection’ Employee Relations 22 IssueID1 58–75 Occurrence Handle10.1108/01425450010310806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gilligan (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory of Women’s Development Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Graves (1999) ‘Gender Bias in Interviewers’ Evaluations of Applicants’ G. N. Powell (Eds) Handbook of Gender and Work Sage Publications Thousand Oaks 145–164

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Graves G. Powell (1996) ArticleTitle‘Sex Similarity, Quality of the Employment Interview and Recruiters’ Evaluation of Actual Applicants’ Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 69, 243–261

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Harcourt M. Harcourt (2002) ArticleTitle‘Do Employers Comply with Civil/Human Rights Legislation? New Evidence From New Zealand Application Forms’ Journal of Business Ethics 35, 207–221 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013822125613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Harding M. Wooden (1997) ‘Recruitment and Selection in Australia: Results from a National Survey of Employers’ M. Wooden D. Harding (Eds) Trends on Staff Selection and Recruitment Commonwealth of Australia Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Hart (1993) ArticleTitle‘Human Resource Management – Time to Exorcize the Militant Tendency’ Employee Relations 15 IssueID3 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Hede D. Dingsdag (1994) ArticleTitle‘Equity in Staff Selection: Managerial Attitudes and Practices’ International Journal of Selection and Management 2 IssueID1 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Kemmelmeier (2003) ArticleTitle‘Individualism and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action: Evidence from Priming Experiments’ Basic and Applied Social Psychology 25 IssueID2 111–119 Occurrence Handle10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Konrad F. Linnehan (1999) ‘Affirmative Action: History, Effects and Attitudes’ G. N. Powell (Eds) Handbook of Gender and Work Sage Publications Thousand Oaks 429–452

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Larwood E. Szwajkowski S. Rose (1998) ‘When Discrimination Makes “sense”: The Rational Bias Theory’ B. A. Gutek A. H. Stromberg L. Larwood (Eds) Women and Work: An Annual Review 3 Sage New York 265–288

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Lovell (2002) ArticleTitle‘Ethics as a Dependent Variable in Individual and Organisational Decision Making’ Journal of Business Ethics 37 IssueID2 145–163 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1015016524880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Lutz (2001) ArticleTitle‘On the Norm of Equality’ International Journal of Social Economics 10/11/12, 782–799

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Martin K. Woldring (2001) ArticleTitle‘Ready for the Mantle? Australian Human Resource Managers as Stewards of Ethics’ International Journal of Human Resource Management 12 IssueID2 243–255

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Mello (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Dual Loyalty Dilemma for HR Managers Under Title VII Compliance’ SAM Advanced Management Journal 65 IssueID1 10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • G. E. Miller J. I. A. Rowney (1999) ArticleTitle‘Workplace Diversity Management in a Multicultural Society’ Women in Management Review 14 IssueID7/8 307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Mitchell (2000) ArticleTitle‘Entrepreneurial Activities in Human Resource Management’ AIC Journal of Business 12 12–27

    Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Morrison M. A. Glinow ParticleVon (1990) ArticleTitle‘Women and Minorities in Management’ American Psychologist 45 IssueID2 200–208 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. W. Ng W. C. K. Chiu (2001) ArticleTitle‘Managing Equal Opportunities for Women: Sorting the Friends from the Foes’ Human Resource Management Journal 11 IssueID1 75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Noble J. Mears (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Impact of Affirmative Action Legislation on Women in Higher Education in Australia: Progress or Procrastination?’ Women in Management Review 15 IssueID8 404–414 Occurrence Handle10.1108/09649420010379312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Noon E. Ogbonna (2001) ‘Introduction: The Key Analytical Themes’ M. Noon E. Ogbonna (Eds) Equality, Diversity and Disadvantage in Employment Palgrave Houndmills, Basingstoke 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • S. L. Payne R. F. Wayland (1999) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Obligation and Diverse Values Assumptions in HRM’ International Journal of Manpower 20 IssueID5 297–308 Occurrence Handle10.1108/01437729910286083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Peterson A. Rhoads B. C. Vaught (2001) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Beliefs of Business Professionals: A Study of Gender, Age and External Factors’ Journal of Business Ethics 31 IssueID3 225–232 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010744927551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Petersen I. Saporta M.-D. L. Deidel (2000) ArticleTitle‘Offering a Job: Meritocracy and Social Networks’ The American Journal of Sociology 106 IssueID3 763–816 Occurrence Handle10.1086/318961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. R. Radtke (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Effects of Gender and Setting on Accountants’ Ethically Sensitive Decisions’ Journal of Business Ethics 24 IssueID4 299–312 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006277331803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Sheridan (1995) ArticleTitle‘Affirmative Action in Australia – Employment Statistics Can’t tell the Whole Story’ Women in Management Review 10 IssueID2 26–34 Occurrence Handle10.1108/09649429510084612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Sinclair (2000) ArticleTitle‘Women within Diversity: Risks and Possibilities’ Women in Management Review 15 IssueID5/6 237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Tata (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Influence of Gender on the use and Effectiveness of Managerial Accounts’ Group and Organization Management 23 IssueID3 266–288

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameTelstra Corporation Ltd. (1999) Yellow Pages Telstra Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • The Equal Opportunity Act (Vic.) 1995.

  • D. Torrington L. Hall (1996) ArticleTitle‘Chasing the Rainbow: How Seeking Status Through Strategy Misses the Point for the Personnel Function’ Employee Relations 18 IssueID6 81–97 Occurrence Handle10.1108/01425459610151475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Torrington L. Hall S. Taylor (2002) Human Resource Management EditionNumber5 Pearson Education Harlow Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Tougas R. Brown A. M. Beaton S. Joly (1995) ArticleTitle‘Neo-sexism: Plus ca Change, Plus c’est Pareil’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 842–849

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Trentham L. Larwood (1998) ArticleTitle‘Gender Discrimination and the Workplace: An Examination of Rational Bias Theory’ Sex Roles 38 IssueID1/2 1–28 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018782226876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. M. Trice J. Belasco J. A. Alutto (1969) ArticleTitle‘The Role of Ceremonials in Organizational Behavior’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review 23, 31–58

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Wajcman (1999) Managing Like a Man: Women and Men in Corporate Management Allen and Unwin, St Leonards Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherspoon, F. D.: 2000, ‘Don’t Kill the Messenger: Reprisal Discrimination in the Enforcement of Civil Rights Laws’, Michigan State University Law Review, 367–406.

  • C. Wiley (2000) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Standards for Human Resource Management Professionals: A Comparative Analysis of Five Major Codes’ Journal of Business Ethics 25 IssueID2 93–114 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006230214847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Woodd (1997) ArticleTitle‘Human Resource Specialists – Guardians of Ethical Conduct?’ Journal of European Industrial Training 21 IssueID3 110–116 Occurrence Handle10.1108/03090599710161810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. L. Xie G. Whyte (1997) ArticleTitle‘Gender Differences Among Managers and Nonmanagers’ Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 14 IssueID3 340–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia

    Lynne Bennington

Authors
  1. Lynne Bennington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynne Bennington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennington, L. HRM Role in EEO: Sheep in Shepherd’s Clothing?. J Bus Ethics 65, 13–21 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0846-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0846-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation