Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Idealism and Relativism as Dispositional Characteristics in the Socially Responsible Decision-Making Process

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated how decision-makers differ in processing their organizational environment (peers and organizational control systems), depending on the levels of their idealism and relativism. Focusing on socially responsible buying/sourcing issues, responses from buying/sourcing professionals from U.S. apparel and shoe companies were analyzed, using a series of regression analyses. The results generally supported the proposition that the degrees of idealism and relativism determine involvement levels that, in turn, result in varying levels of reactions to the organizational environment and corresponding amounts of information processing. Highly idealistic (relativistic) individuals were influenced by only idealistic (relativistic) signals of organizational environment. Further analysis showed highly idealistic and relativistic individuals were more likely to evaluate the organizational environment in terms of its business merit. The results suggest that organizations need to carefully plan how to communicate underlying meanings of organizational initiatives with their employees, knowing that individuals who have strong ethical opinions will only react to what they believe and elaborate its value for business. Further theoretical and practical implications and suggestions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SRB:

Socially responsible buying/sourcing

ELM:

Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty and Cacioppo, 1986)

References

  • D. L. Altheide P. A. Aldler P. Aldler D. A. Altheide (1978) Social meanings of employee theft J. M. Johnson J. D. Douglas (Eds) Crime At The Top Lippincott Philadephia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • AMCHAM: 1997, September 1. ‘Cheap vs. ethical: Should the U.S. impose its ethical standards abroad and who should pay for its imposition?’, J ournal of the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong, Business Section. Retrieved from Lexis-Nexis database

  • J. W. Anderson SuffixJr. (1989) Corporate Social Responsibility Quorum Books New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. G. Arnold N. E. Bowie (2003) ArticleTitleSweatshops and respect for persons Business Ethics Quarterly 13 IssueID2 221–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. G. and L. P. Hartman: 2004, Beyond Sweatshops: Positive Deviancy and Global Labor Practices. Abstract presented at International Society of Business, Economics, and Ethics Third World Congress (University of Melbourne, Australia), p. 68

  • R. M. Baron D. A. Kenny (1986) ArticleTitleThe moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173–1182 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Blau R. Katerberg (1982) ArticleTitleToward enhancing research with the Social Information processing approach to job design Academy of Management Review 7 543–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbin. November, 1997. U.S. Imports: Who’s Placing the Orders? 39(3), 22–23

  • Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 1996. The Apparel Industry and Codes of Conduct: A Solution to the International Child Labor Problem? (US Department of Labor, Washington, DC)

  • Calvert Online (2002). Social Analysis Criteria (available at http://www.calvertgroup.com/sri_647.html)

  • A. Davis-Blake J. Pfeifer (1989) ArticleTitleJust a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organizational research Academy of Management Review 14 385–400

    Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Dickson (1999) ArticleTitleU.S. consumers’ knowledge of and concern with apparel sweatshops Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 3 IssueID1 44–55 Occurrence Handle10.1108/eb022547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Dotson E.M. Hyatt (2000) ArticleTitleReligious symbols as peripheral cues in advertising: A replication of the elaboration likelihood model Journal of Business Research 48 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • P. C. Douglas R. A. Davidson B. N. Schwartz (2001) ArticleTitleThe effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments Journal of Business Ethics 34 101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Drumwright (1994) ArticleTitleSocially responsible organizational buying: Environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion Journal of Marketing 58 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Etheredge (1999) ArticleTitleThe perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: An alternative scale structure Journal of Business Ethics 18 51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • O. C. Ferrell L. G. Gresham (1985) ArticleTitleA contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing Journal of Marketing 49 87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • O.C. Ferrell L.G. Gresham J. Fraedrich (1989) ArticleTitleA synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing Journal of Macromarketing 9 IssueID2 55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • D. R. Forsyth (1980) ArticleTitleA taxonomy of ethical ideologies Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 IssueID1 175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • D. R. Forsyth (1992) ArticleTitleJudging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies Journal of Business Ethics 11 461–470

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Greenberg (1987) ArticleTitleA taxonomy of organizational justice theories Academy of Management Review 12 9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. House S. A. Shane D.M. Herold (1996) ArticleTitleRumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated Academy of Management Review 21 203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • S. D. Hunt S. Vitell (1992) The general theory of marketing ethics: A retrospective and revision N. C. Smith J. A. Quelch (Eds) Ethics in Marketing Richard D. Irwin Homewood, IL 775–784

    Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Inman L. McAlister W. D. Hoyer (1990) ArticleTitlePromotion signal: Proxy for a price cut? Journal of Consumer Research 17 74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Jones (1991) ArticleTitleEthical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model Academy of Management Review 16 366–395

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Klein (1998) ArticleTitleDon Quixote and the problem of idealism and realism in business ethics Business Ethics Quarterly 8 43–63

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Marta A. Singhapakdi N. Higgs-Kleyn (2001) ArticleTitleCorporate ethical values in South Africa Thunderbird International Business Review 43 755–772

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Okechuchu (1992) ArticleTitleThe relationships of prior knowledge and involvement to advertising recall and evaluation International Journal of Research in Marketing 9 115–130

    Google Scholar 

  • J. G. P. Paolillo S. J. Vitell (2002) ArticleTitleAn empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making Journal of Business Ethics 35 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • D. M. Petterson (2001) ArticleTitleCausal effects of regulatory, organizational and personal factors on ethical sensitivity Journal of Business Ethics 30 123–159

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Petty J. T. Cacioppo (1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change Springer/Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Petty J. T. Cacioppo D. Schumann (1983) ArticleTitleCentral and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement Journal of Consumer Research 10 135–146

    Google Scholar 

  • D. P. Robin R. E. Reidenbach P. J. Forrest (1996) ArticleTitleThe perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad-managers Journal of Business Research 35 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • G. R. Salancik J. Pfeffer (1978) ArticleTitleA social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design Administrative Science Quarterly 23 224–253

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Sathe (1985) Culture and Related Corporate Realities Irwin Homewood, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Singhapakdi S. J. Vitell (1990) ArticleTitleMarketing ethics: Factors influencing perceptions of ethical problems and alternatives Journal of Macromarketing 12 4–18

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Singhapakdi S. J. Vitell K. L. Kraft (1996) ArticleTitleMoral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals Journal of Business Research 36 245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Singhapakdi S. J. Vitell K. C. Rallapalli K. L. Kraft (1996) ArticleTitleThe perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development Journal of Business Ethics 15 1131–1140

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Singhapakdi S. J. Vitell G. R. Franke (1999) ArticleTitleAntecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 27 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Sparks S. D. Hunt (1998) ArticleTitleMarketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation Journal of Marketing 62 92–109

    Google Scholar 

  • L. K. Trevino (1986) ArticleTitleEthical decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model Academy of Management Review 11 601–617

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor: 1997, Garment enforcement␣report: July 1997–September 1997 (available at http://www.dol.gov/dol/esa/public/nosweat/garment8.htm)

  • S. Valentine T. Barnett (2002) ArticleTitleEthics codes and sales professionals’ perceptions of their organizations’ ethical values Journal of Business Ethics 40 191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Vitell K. Rallapalli A. Singhapakdi (1993) ArticleTitleMarketing norms: The influences of personal moral philosophies and organizational ethical culture Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21 331–337

    Google Scholar 

  • G. R. Weaver L. K. Trevino P. L. Cochran (1999) ArticleTitleCorporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors Academy of Management Journal 42 41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G.: 1997, September 23, ‘California: News and insight on business in the golden state’, Los Angeles Times p. D2

  • J. H. Wolfe M. A. Dickson (2002) ArticleTitleApparel manufacturer and retailer efforts to reduce child labor: An ethics of virtue perspective on codes of conduct Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 20 183–195

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Zey-Ferrell O.C. Ferrell (1982) ArticleTitleRole-set configuration and opportunities as predictors of unethical behavior in organizations Human Relations 7 557–569

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haesun Park.

Additional information

Haesun Park is Assistant Professor in the School of Human Ecology at Louisiana State University. She received her Ph.D. from the Dept. of Consumer and Textile Sciences, the Ohio State University in 2001. Her research interests include fair labor management and international sourcing in the textiles and apparel industries.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, H. The Role of Idealism and Relativism as Dispositional Characteristics in the Socially Responsible Decision-Making Process. J Bus Ethics 56, 81–98 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-3239-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-3239-1

Keywords

Navigation