Abstract
Having the ambition to contribute to the practical value of the theory on corporate social performance (CSP), this paper approaches the question whether CSP can contribute to the competitive advantage of firms. We adopted an explorative case-study methodology to explore the variety of positive and negative effects of CSP on the competitiveness of organizations. As this study aimed at identifying as great variety of these effects as possible, we selected a diversified group of respondents. Data was thus collected through embedded units of analysis in a petrochemical company, and triangulated with the opinions of experts on CSP. Overall, we found various positive and negative effects of CSP on the competitiveness of organizations. CSP is therefore not an innocent adventure for executives, but rather a strategy for achieving corporate objectives. If not carefully implemented, the CSP strategy may harm the competitive advantage of the firm, as our results have suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. A. Akerlof (1970) ArticleTitle‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and The Market Mechanism’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 IssueID4 488–500
P. Arlow M. J. Gannon (1982) ArticleTitle‘Social Responsiveness, Corporate Structure, and Economic Performance’ Academy of Management Review 7 IssueID2 235–341
K. B. Backhaus B. A. Stone K. Heiner (2002) ArticleTitle‘Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness’ Business & Society 41 IssueID3 292–318
J. B. Barney (1991) ArticleTitle‘Firms Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’ Journal of Management 17 IssueID1 99–120
J. B. Barney (2001) ArticleTitle‘Resource-based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten-year Retrospective on the Resource-based View’ Journal of Management 27 IssueID6 643–651
J. R. Boatright (1996) ArticleTitle‘Business Ethics and The Theory of the Firm’ American Business Law Journal 34 IssueID2 217–238
L. Burke J. M. Logsdon (1996) ArticleTitle‘How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off’ Long Range Planning 29 IssueID4 495–502
A. B. Carroll (1979) ArticleTitle‘A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’ Academy of Management Review 4 IssueID4 497–505
M. B. E. Clarkson (1995) ArticleTitle‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’ Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 92–117
R. L. Daft K. E. Weick (1984) ArticleTitle‘Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems’ Academy of Management Review 9 IssueID2 284–295
P. Pelsmacker ParticleDe P. Kenhove ParticleVan (1996) Marktonderzoek: Methoden en Toepassingen [Market Research: Methods and Applications] Garant Leuven
N. A. Dentchev A. Heene (2004) ArticleTitle‘Managing Reputation of Restructuring Corporations: Send the Right Signal to the Right Stakeholder’ Journal of Public Affairs 4 IssueID1 56–72
J. E. Dutton J. Webster (1988) ArticleTitle‘Patterns of Interest Around Issues: The Role of Uncertainty and Feasibility’ Academy of Management Journal 31 IssueID3 663–675
C. Fombrun M. Shanley (1990) ArticleTitle‘What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’ Academy of Management Journal 33 IssueID2 233–258
C. J. Fombrun (2001) ‘Corporate Reputation as Economic Asset’ M. A. Hitt E. R. Freeman J. S. Harrison (Eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management Blackwell Publishers Oxford 289–310
C. J. Fombrun N. A. Gardberg M. L. Barnett (2000) ArticleTitle‘Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk’ Business and Society Review 105 IssueID1 85–106
E. Freeman J. Liedtka (1997) ArticleTitle‘Stakeholder Capitalism and the Value Chain’ European Management Journal 15 IssueID3 286–296
M. Friedman (1962) Capitalism and Freedom University of Chicago Press Chicago
Friedman, M.: 1970, Sept. 13, ‘A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine.
J. Frooman (1999) ArticleTitle‘Stakeholder Influence Strategies’ Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID102 191–205
L. W. Fry G. D. Keim R. E. Meiners (1982) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or for-Profit?’ Academy of Management Journal 25 IssueID1 94–106
N. A. Gardberg C. J. Fombrun (2002) ArticleTitle‘For Better or Worse–The Most Visible American Corporate Reputations’ Corporate Reputation Review 4 IssueID4 385–391
D. A. Gioia (1999) ArticleTitle‘Practicability, Paradigms, and Problems in Stakeholder Theorizing’ Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 228–232
B. G. Glaser A. L. Strauss (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research Weidenfeld and Nicolson London
D. W. Greening D. B. Turban (2000) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce’ Business & Society 39 IssueID3 254–280
J. J. Griffin J. F. Mahon (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-five Years of Incomparable Research’ Business & Society 36 IssueID1 5–31
S. L. Hart S. Sharma (2004) ArticleTitle‘Engaging Fringe Stakeholders for Competitive Imagination’ Academy of Management Executive 18 IssueID1 7–18
Heugens, P.: 2001, ‘Strategic Issues Management: Implications for Corporate Performance’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam.
A. J. Hillman G. D. Keim (2001) ArticleTitle‘Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?’ Strategic Management Journal 22 125–139
R. E. Hoskisson M. A. Hitt W. P. Wan D. Yiu (1999) ArticleTitle‘Theory and Research in Strategic Management: Swings of a Pendulum’ Journal of Management 25 IssueID3 417–456
Husted, B. W. and D. B. Allen: 2004. Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation Among Large Firms in Spain. Paper presented at the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, in Jackson Hole, WY, USA, on 4--7 March.
I. M. Jawahar G. L. McLaughlin (2001) ArticleTitle‘Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: An Organizational Life Cycle Approach’ Academy of Management Review 26 IssueID3 397–414
G. D. Keim (1978) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Enlightened Self-Interest Model’ Academy of Management Review 3 IssueID1 32–39
T. Levitt (1958) ArticleTitle‘The Dangers of Social Responsibility’ Harvard Business Review 36 IssueID5 41–50
J. D. Margolis J. P. Walsh (2001) People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between Company’s Social and Financial Performance Mahwah New Jersey
J. D. Margolis J. P. Walsh (2003) ArticleTitle‘Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business’ Administrative Science Quarterly 48 268–305
B. McEvily A. Zaheer (1999) ArticleTitle‘Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities’ Strategic Management Journal 20 1133–1156
M. B. Miles A. M. Huberman (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis Sage London
J. A. Mirrlees (1997) ArticleTitle‘Information and Incentives: The Economics of Carrots and sticks’ The Economic Journal 107 1311–1329
L. A. Mohr D. J. Webb K. E. Harris (2001) ArticleTitle‘Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior’ The Journal of Consumer Affairs 35 IssueID1 45–72 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x
J. Pfeffer G. Salancik (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective Harper & Row New York
M. E. Porter (1996) ArticleTitle‘What is Strategy?’ Harvard Business Review 74 IssueID6 61–78
D. M. Randall M. F. Fernandes (1991) ArticleTitle‘The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ehtics Research’ Journal of Business Ethics 10 IssueID11 805–817
R. M. Roman S. Hayibor B. R. Agle (1999) ArticleTitle‘Research Note The Relationship Between Social and Financial Performance: Repainting a Portrait’, Business & Society 38 IssueID1 109–125
T. Rowley S. Berman (2000) ArticleTitle‘A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performances’ Business & Society 39 IssueID4 397–418
D. H. Saiia A. B. Carroll A. K. Buchholz (2003) ArticleTitle‘Philantropy as Strategy: When Corporate Charity “begins at home”’ Business & Society 42 IssueID2 169–201
J. Sandberg (2000) ArticleTitle‘Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach’ Academy of Management Journal 43 IssueID1 9–25
C. Shapiro (1983) ArticleTitle‘Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 IssueID4 661–679
J. E. Stiglitz (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 IssueID4 1441–1478
D. B. Turban D. W. Greening (1996) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’ Academy of Management Journal 40 IssueID3 658–672
B. Wernerfelt (1984) ArticleTitle‘A Resource-based View of the Firm’ Strategic Management Journal 5 171–180
D. Wood (2000) ArticleTitle‘Theory and Integrity in Business and Society’ Business and Society 39 IssueID4 359–378
R. K. Yin (1993) Applications of Case Study Research Sage London
R. K. Yin (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods Sage Publications London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Paper presentated at the EBEN annual conference 2004, Enschede, The Netherlands June 24–26
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dentchev, N.A. Corporate Social Performance as a Business Strategy. J Bus Ethics 55, 395–410 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1348-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1348-5