Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Customized breast cancer risk assessment in an ambulatory clinic: a portal for identifying women at risk

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Existing high-risk clinic models focus on patients with known risk factors, potentially missing many high-risk patients. Here we describe our experience implementing universal risk assessment in an ambulatory breast center.

Methods

Since May 2017, all breast center patients completed a customized intake survey addressing known breast cancer risk factors and lifestyle choices. Patient characteristics, family history, risk scores, and lifestyle factors were examined; patients with high-risk breast lesions were excluded. Patients were considered at increased risk by model thresholds Gail 5-year risk > 1.7% (35–59 years), Gail 5-year risk > 5.5% (≥ 60 years), or Tyrer–Cuzick (T–C) v7 lifetime risk > 20% (any age).

Results

From May 2017–April 2018, there were 874 eligible patients—420 (48%) referred for risk assessment (RA) and 454 (52%) for non-specific breast complaints (NSBC). Overall, 389 (45%) were at increased risk of breast cancer. Gail 5-year risks were similar between RA and NSBC patients. However, RA patients more frequently met criteria by T–C score (P = 0.02). Of all patients at increased risk, 149 (39%) were overweight (BMI > 25) or obese (BMI > 30) and only 159 (41%) met recommended exercise standards. NSBC patients who met criteria were more frequently smokers (8% vs 1%, P < 0.01); all other demographic/lifestyle factors were similar among high-risk patients regardless of referral reason.

Conclusions

Universal risk assessment in a comprehensive breast health center identified 45% of our population to be at increased risk of breast cancer. This clinical care model provides a unique opportunity to identify and address modifiable risk factors among women at risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sprague BL, Trentham-Dietz A, Egan KM, Titus-Ernstoff L, Hampton JM, Newcomb PA (2008) Proportion of invasive breast cancer attributable to risk factors modifiable after menopause. Am J Epidemiol 168(4):404–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tamimi RM, Spiegelman D, Smith-Warner SA, Wang M, Pazaris M, Willett WC, Eliassen AH, Hunter DJ (2016) Population attributable risk of modifiable and nonmodifiable breast cancer risk factors in postmenopausal breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 184(12):884–893. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Azevedo ESG, de Moura L, Curado MP, Gomes Fda S, Otero U, Rezende LF, Daumas RP, Guimaraes RM, Meira KC, Leite Ida C, Valente JG, Moreira RI, Koifman R, Malta DC, Mello MS, Guedes TW, Boffetta P (2016) The Fraction of cancer attributable to ways of life, infections, occupation, and environmental agents in Brazil in 2020. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0148761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson LF, Page AN, Dunn NA, Pandeya N, Protani MM, Taylor RJ (2013) Population attributable risk of modifiable risk factors associated with invasive breast cancer in women aged 45–69 years in Queensland, Australia. Maturitas 76(4):370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maas P, Barrdahl M, Joshi AD, Auer PL, Gaudet MM, Milne RL, Schumacher FR, Anderson WF, Check D, Chattopadhyay S, Baglietto L, Berg CD, Chanock SJ, Cox DG, Figueroa JD, Gail MH, Graubard BI, Haiman CA, Hankinson SE, Hoover RN, Isaacs C, Kolonel LN, Le Marchand L, Lee IM, Lindstrom S, Overvad K, Romieu I, Sanchez MJ, Southey MC, Stram DO, Tumino R, VanderWeele TJ, Willett WC, Zhang S, Buring JE, Canzian F, Gapstur SM, Henderson BE, Hunter DJ, Giles GG, Prentice RL, Ziegler RG, Kraft P, Garcia-Closas M, Chatterjee N (2016) breast cancer risk from modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors among white women in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2(10):1295–1302. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Strumylaite L, Sharp SJ, Kregzdyte R, Poskiene L, Bogusevicius A, Pranys D (2015) The association of low-to-moderate alcohol consumption with breast cancer subtypes defined by hormone receptor status. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0144680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Altieri A, Cogliano V (2007) Carcinogenicity of alcoholic beverages. Lancet Oncol 8(4):292–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amadou A, Hainaut P, Romieu I (2013) Role of obesity in the risk of breast cancer: lessons from anthropometry. J Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/906495

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Eliassen AH, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE (2006) Adult weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. JAMA 296(2):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.2.193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kushi LH, Doyle C, McCullough M, Rock CL, Demark-Wahnefried W, Bandera EV, Gapstur S, Patel AV, Andrews K, Gansler T (2012) American Cancer Society Guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin 62(1):30–67. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen MR, Thorpe J, Buist DS, Beatty JD, Watabayashi K, Hanson N, Resta R, Chubak J, Urban N (2016) Cancer risk awareness and concern among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Behav Med 42(1):18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2014.947234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hannan E, Peter O’Leary D, Cheung C, Buhamad F, O’Donoghue G, Manning A, Oliver Murphy J, Hill A, Power C (2018) Knowledge of breast cancer risk factors, screening, and treatment methods in patients attending the breast clinic: a survey of 1,018 women. Breast J 24(6):1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Livaudais-Toman J, Karliner LS, Tice JA, Kerlikowske K, Gregorich S, Perez-Stable EJ, Pasick RJ, Chen A, Quinn J, Kaplan CP (2015) Impact of a primary care based intervention on breast cancer knowledge, risk perception and concern: a randomized, controlled trial. Breast 24(6):758–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2015.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haas JS, Kaplan CP, Gregorich SE, Perez-Stable EJ, Des Jarlais G (2004) Do physicians tailor their recommendations for breast cancer risk reduction based on patient’s risk? J Gen Intern Med 19(4):302–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30280.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenberger LH, Weber R, Sjoberg D, Vickers AJ, Mangino DA, Morrow M, Pilewskie ML (2017) Impact of self-reported data on the acquisition of multi-generational family history and lifestyle factors among women seen in a high-risk breast screening program: a focus on modifiable risk factors and genetic referral. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162(2):275–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4115-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ormseth SR, Wellisch DK, Arechiga AE, Draper TL (2015) Predicting reattendance at a high-risk breast cancer clinic. Palliat Support Care 13(5):1441–1448. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951515000164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Engel NJ, Gordon P, Thull DL, Dudley B, Herstine J, Jankowitz RC, Zorn KK (2012) A multidisciplinary clinic for individualizing management of patients at increased risk for breast and gynecologic cancer. Fam Cancer 11(3):419–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-012-9530-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA (2018) Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 15(3 Pt A):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ozanne EM, Loberg A, Hughes S, Lawrence C, Drohan B, Semine A, Jellinek M, Cronin C, Milham F, Dowd D, Block C, Lockhart D, Sharko J, Grinstein G, Hughes KS (2009) Identification and management of women at high risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome. Breast J 15(2):155–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00690.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Colditz GA, Hankinson SE (2005) The Nurses’ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women. Nat Rev Cancer 5(5):388–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation (2000) WHO Technical Report Series, vol 894. Geneva

  22. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(24):1879–1886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23(7):1111–1130. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hartman SJ, Dunsiger SI, Jacobsen PB (2011) The relationship of psychosocial factors to mammograms, physical activity, and fruit and vegetable consumption among sisters of breast cancer patients. Int J Womens Health 3:257–263. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s23246

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bertoni N, de Souza MC, Crocamo S, Szklo M, de Almeida LM (2018) Is a family history of the breast cancer related to women’s cancer prevention behaviors? Int J Behav Med Aug. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-018-9737-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spector D, Deroo LA, Sandler DP (2011) Lifestyle behaviors in black and white women with a family history of breast cancer. Prev Med 52(5):394–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bostean G, Crespi CM, McCarthy WJ (2013) Associations among family history of cancer, cancer screening and lifestyle behaviors: a population-based study. Cancer Causes Control 24(8):1491–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0226-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cuzick J, Forbes J, Edwards R, Baum M, Cawthorn S, Coates A, Hamed A, Howell A, Powles T, investigators I (2002) First results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS-I): a randomised prevention trial. Lancet 360(9336):817–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Cecchini RS, Cronin WM, Robidoux A, Bevers TB, Kavanah MT, Atkins JN, Margolese RG, Runowicz CD, James JM, Ford LG, Wolmark N (2005) Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(22):1652–1662. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM, Cecchini RS, Atkins JN, Bevers TB, Fehrenbacher L, Pajon ER Jr, Wade JL III, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, James J, Lippman SM, Runowicz CD, Ganz PA, Reis SE, McCaskill-Stevens W, Ford LG, Jordan VC, Wolmark N, National Surgical Adjuvant B, Bowel P (2006) Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial. JAMA 295(23):2727–2741. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.23.joc60074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Ales-Martinez JE, Cheung AM, Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, McTiernan A, Robbins J, Johnson KC, Martin LW, Winquist E, Sarto GE, Garber JE, Fabian CJ, Pujol P, Maunsell E, Farmer P, Gelmon KA, Tu D, Richardson H, Investigators NCMS (2011) Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 364(25):2381–2391. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1103507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tice JA, Miglioretti DL, Li CS, Vachon CM, Gard CC, Kerlikowske K (2015) Breast density and benign breast disease: risk assessment to identify women at high risk of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(28):3137–3143. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8869

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Brentnall AR, Harkness EF, Astley SM, Donnelly LS, Stavrinos P, Sampson S, Fox L, Sergeant JC, Harvie MN, Wilson M, Beetles U, Gadde S, Lim Y, Jain A, Bundred S, Barr N, Reece V, Howell A, Cuzick J, Evans DG (2015) Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer–Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res 17(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0653-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Siu AL (2016) Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 164(4):279–296. https://doi.org/10.7326/m15-2886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticciolo D, Brenner RJ, Bassett L, Berg W, Feig S, Hendrick E, Mendelson E, D’Orsi C, Sickles E, Burhenne LW (2010) Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 7(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, Herzig A, Michaelson JS, Shih YC, Walter LC, Church TR, Flowers CR, LaMonte SJ, Wolf AM, DeSantis C, Lortet-Tieulent J, Andrews K, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, Smith RA, Brawley OW, Wender R (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update From the American Cancer Society. JAMA 314(15):1599–1614. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.12783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Degnim AC, Winham SJ, Frank RD, Pankratz VS, Dupont WD, Vierkant RA, Frost MH, Hoskin TL, Vachon CM, Ghosh K, Hieken TJ, Carter JM, Denison LA, Broderick B, Hartmann LC, Visscher DW, Radisky DC (2018) Model for predicting breast cancer risk in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 36(18):1840–1846. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.75.9480

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is funded by a grant from the Susan G. Komen foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tari A. King.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

JA Suskin reports stock ownership in Pfizer, Thermo Fisher, and Danaher (owned by immediate family members). JE Garber reports a consultant/advisory role for Helix Genetics. TA King reports a consultant/advisory role for Genomic Health. None of these affiliations influenced this work. All other authors report no conflicts.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

The study was approved by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Institutional Review Board as a low risk study and approved with waiver of consent.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 116 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiss, A., Grossmith, S., Cutts, D. et al. Customized breast cancer risk assessment in an ambulatory clinic: a portal for identifying women at risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 175, 229–237 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05116-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05116-5

Keywords

Navigation