Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The 3′UTR of the pseudogene CYP4Z2P promotes tumor angiogenesis in breast cancer by acting as a ceRNA for CYP4Z1

  • Preclinical Study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 26 October 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Pseudogenes are now known to regulate their protein-coding counterparts. Additionally, disturbances of 3′UTRs could increase the risk of cancer susceptibility by acting as modulators of gene expression. The aim of this study was to investigate the roles of the pseudogene CYP4Z2P-3′UTR and functional gene CYP4Z1-3′UTR in breast cancer angiogenesis process. The levels of CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3′UTR and miRNA of interests were measured in 22 cancerous tissues paired with non-cancerous samples by qRT-PCR. The effects of CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3′UTR were studied by overexpression and RNA interference approaches in vitro and ex vivo. Insights of the mechanism of competitive endogenous RNAs were gained from bioinformatic analysis, luciferase assays, and western blot. The positive CYP4Z2P/CYP4Z1 interaction and negative interaction between predicted miRNAs and CYP4Z2P or CYP4Z1 were identified via qRT-PCR assay and bivariate correlation analysis. CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3′UTR share several miRNA-binding sites, including miR-211, miR-125a-3p, miR-197, miR-1226, and miR-204. The CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3′UTRs arrest the interference caused by of these miRNAs, resulting in increased translation of CYP4Z1. Moreover, ectopic expression of the CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3′UTRs exhibit tumor angiogenesis-promoting properties in breast cancer collectively by inducing the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt. Co-transfection with Dicer siRNA reversed the CYP4Z2P 3′UTR-mediated changes. Additionally, PI3K or ERK inhibitors reversed CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3′UTR-mediated changes in VEGF-A expression. Increased CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3′UTR expression promotes tumor angiogenesis in breast cancer partly via miRNA-dependent activation of PI3K/Akt and ERK1/2. The CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3′UTRs could thus be used as combinatorial miRNA inhibitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 26 October 2019

    After publication of this article [1], it came to our attention that there was an error in Fig. 4b and 4c. In Fig.4b, the migration images of vector groups were incorrect based on this error, the authors re-constructed the migration experiments of Fig. 4b, and the consistent results were obtained. In Fig. 4c, the tube formation image of the Z2P-UTR-siRNA&Z1-UTR group (MCF-7) of Fig. 7d was accidentally misused in control group (MCF-7) and vector group (MCF-7) of Fig. 4c. The corrected Fig. 4 is provided below. This error did not impact the conclusions of the article. The authors apologize for this error.

  • 26 October 2019

    After publication of this article [1], it came to our attention that there was an error in Fig. 4b and 4c. In Fig.4b, the migration images of vector groups were incorrect based on this error, the authors re-constructed the migration experiments of Fig. 4b, and the consistent results were obtained. In Fig. 4c, the tube formation image of the Z2P-UTR-siRNA&Z1-UTR group (MCF-7) of Fig. 7d was accidentally misused in control group (MCF-7) and vector group (MCF-7) of Fig. 4c. The corrected Fig. 4 is provided below. This error did not impact the conclusions of the article. The authors apologize for this error.

References

  1. Perry MM, Tsitsiou E, Austin PJ, Lindsay MA, Gibeon DS, Adcock IM, Chung KF (2014) Role of non-coding RNAs in maintaining primary airway smooth muscle cells. Respir Res 15(1):58

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zovoilis A, Mungall AJ, Moore R, Varhol R, Chu A, Wong T, Marra M, Jones SJ (2014) The expression level of small non-coding RNAs derived from the first exon of protein-coding genes is predictive of cancer status. EMBO Rep 15(4):402–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chendrimada TP, Gregory RI, Kumaraswamy E, Norman J, Cooch N, Nishikura K, Shiekhattar R (2005) TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processing and gene silencing. Nature 436(7051):740–744

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CH, Cheng CY, Chen YC, Sue YM, Liu CT, Cheng TH, Hsu YH, Chen TH (2014) MicroRNA-328 inhibits renal tubular cell epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by targeting the CD44 in pressure-induced renal fibrosis. PLoS One 9(6):e99802

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao M, Li Y, Lu H, Meng Q, Wang L, Cai L, Dong X (2014) miR-23a-mediated migration/invasion is rescued by its target, IRS-1, in non-small cell lung cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 140(10):1661–1670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ling S, Birnbaum Y, Nanhwan MK, Thomas B, Bajaj M, Ye Y (2013) MicroRNA-dependent cross-talk between VEGF and HIF1alpha in the diabetic retina. Cell Signal 25(12):2840–2847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tay Y, Kats L, Salmena L, Weiss D, Tan SM, Ala U, Karreth F, Poliseno L, Provero P, Di Cunto F et al (2011) Coding-independent regulation of the tumor suppressor PTEN by competing endogenous mRNAs. Cell 147(2):344–357

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tam OH, Aravin AA, Stein P, Girard A, Murchison EP, Cheloufi S, Hodges E, Anger M, Sachidanandam R, Schultz RM et al (2008) Pseudogene-derived small interfering RNAs regulate gene expression in mouse oocytes. Nature 453(7194):534–538

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Han YJ, Ma SF, Yourek G, Park YD, Garcia JGN (2011) A transcribed pseudogene of MYLK promotes cell proliferation. FASEB J 25(7):2305–2312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo X, Tang Y (2011) OCT4 pseudogenes present in human leukemia cells. Clin Exp Med 12(4):207–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang J, Li T, Gao C, Lv X, Liu K, Song H, Xing Y, Xi T (2014) FOXO1 3′UTR functions as a ceRNA in repressing the metastases of breast cancer cells via regulating miRNA activity. FEBS Lett 588(17):3218–3224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jia J, Yao P, Arif A, Fox PL (2013) Regulation and dysregulation of 3′UTR-mediated translational control. Curr Opin Genet Dev 23(1):29–34

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakagawa Y, Minato M, Sumiyoshi K, Maeda A, Hara C, Murase Y, Nishida T, Kubota S, Takigawa M (2013) Regulation of CCN1 via the 3′-untranslated region. J Cell Commun Signal 7(3):207–217

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mercer TR, Wilhelm D, Dinger ME, Solda G, Korbie DJ, Glazov EA, Truong V, Schwenke M, Simons C, Matthaei KI et al (2011) Expression of distinct RNAs from 3′ untranslated regions. Nucleic Acids Res 39(6):2393–2403

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Swart M, Dandara C (2014) Genetic variation in the 3′-UTR of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, NR1I2, and UGT2B7: potential effects on regulation by microRNA and pharmacogenomics relevance. Front Genet 5:167

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rutnam ZJ, Du WW, Yang W, Yang X, Yang BB (2014) The pseudogene TUSC2P promotes TUSC2 function by binding multiple microRNAs. Nat Commun 5:2914

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rieger MA (2004) Identification of a novel mammary-restricted cytochrome P450, CYP4Z1, with overexpression in breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 64(7):2357–2364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu W, Chai H, Li Y, Zhao H, Xie X, Zheng H, Wang C, Wang X, Yang G, Cai X et al (2012) Increased expression of CYP4Z1 promotes tumor angiogenesis and growth in human breast cancer. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 264(1):73–83

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng L, Li X, Gu Y, Ma Y, Xi T (2014) Pseudogene CYP4Z2P 3′UTR promotes angiogenesis in breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 453(3):545–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oh SH, Kim WY, Kim JH, Younes MN, El-Naggar AK, Myers JN, Kies M, Cohen P, Khuri F, Hong WK et al (2006) Identification of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 as a farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH66336-induced negative regulator of angiogenesis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 12(2):653–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicosia RF, Ottinetti A (1990) Growth of microvessels in serum-free matrix culture of rat aorta. A quantitative assay of angiogenesis in vitro. Lab Invest 63(1):115–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu G, Yao W, Gumireddy K, Li A, Wang J, Xiao W, Chen K, Xiao H, Li H, Tang K et al (2014) Pseudogene PTENP1 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to suppress clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression. Mol Cancer Ther 13(12):3086–3097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Esposito F, De Martino M, Petti MG, Forzati F, Tornincasa M, Federico A, Arra C, Pierantoni GM, Fusco A (2014) HMGA1 pseudogenes as candidate proto-oncogenic competitive endogenous RNAs. Oncotarget 5(18):8341–8354

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li L, Wang D, Xue M, Mi X, Liang Y, Wang P (2014) 3′UTR shortening identifies high-risk cancers with targeted dysregulation of the ceRNA network. Sci Rep 4:5406

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ebert MS, Sharp PA (2010) MicroRNA sponges: progress and possibilities. RNA 16(11):2043–2050

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown BD, Naldini L (2009) Exploiting and antagonizing microRNA regulation for therapeutic and experimental applications. Nat Rev Genet 10(8):578–585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitrovich QM, Anderson P (2005) mRNA surveillance of expressed pseudogenes in C. elegans. Curr Biol 15(10):963–967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Denzler R, Agarwal V, Stefano J, Bartel DP, Stoffel M (2014) Assessing the ceRNA hypothesis with quantitative measurements of miRNA and target abundance. Mol Cell 54(5):766–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Figliuzzi M, Marinari E, De Martino A (2013) MicroRNAs as a selective channel of communication between competing RNAs: a steady-state theory. Biophys J 104(5):1203–1213

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ala U, Karreth FA, Bosia C, Pagnani A, Taulli R, Leopold V, Tay Y, Provero P, Zecchina R, Pandolfi PP (2013) Integrated transcriptional and competitive endogenous RNA networks are cross-regulated in permissive molecular environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(18):7154–7159

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paplomata E, O’Regan R (2014) The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in breast cancer: targets, trials and biomarkers. Ther Adv Med Oncol 6(4):154–166

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Britschgi A, Radimerski T, Bentires-Alj M (2013) Targeting PI3K, HER2 and the IL-8/JAK2 axis in metastatic breast cancer: which combination makes the whole greater than the sum of its parts? Drug Resist Updat 16(3–5):68–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fu J, Tian C, Xing M, Wang X, Guo H, Sun L, Sun L, Jiang Z, Zhang L (2014) KU004 induces G1 cell cycle arrest in human breast cancer SKBR-3 cells by modulating PI3K/Akt pathway. Biomed Pharmacother 68(5):625–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Marchese FP, Huarte M (2014) Long non-coding RNAs and chromatin modifiers: their place in the epigenetic code. Epigenetics 9(1):21–26

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Thum T, Fiedler J (2014) LINCing MALAT1 and angiogenesis. Circ Res 114(9):1366–1368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vitiello M, Tuccoli A, Poliseno L (2014) Long non-coding RNAs in cancer: implications for personalized therapy. Cell Oncol (Dordr)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 81372331] (to Tao Xi), Major Drug Discovery of Science and Technology Major Projects [Grants 2009ZX09103-652] and the project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Xi.

Additional information

Lufeng Zheng and Xiaoman Li contributed equally to this study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

CYP4Z2P and CYP4Z1 expression were regulated by miR-211, miR-1226, miR-125a, miR-197 and miR-204. (A) miR-211, miR-1226, miR-125a, miR-197 and miR-204 level were lower in breast cancer tissues than in mammary gland tissues. Twenty-two pairs of breast tumors with adjacent mammary gland epithelial tissues were analyzed by qRT-PCR. (B) Correlation analysis of the expression of CYP4Z2P, CYP4Z1 and miR-211, miR-1226, miR-125a, miR-197, miR-204 in breast cancer tissues. The expression of CYP4Z2P and CYP4Z1 is inversely correlated with miRNAs level. (C) Luciferase reporter assay after transfection. Fluc activity in cells was measured and normalized to β-galactosidase activity. miR-211, miR-1226, miR-125a, miR-197 and miR-204 could repress the luciferase signals of wild type not the mutant CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3’UTR reporters in 293T cells. Values are mean ± SD. *P<0.05, **P < 0.01 (n = 3, one-way ANOVA) (TIFF 8073 kb)

Fig. S2

Z1-UTR overexpression promotes tumor-induced angiogenesis in CAM of the chick embryo and rat aortic ring assays. (A) Different CM was gently placed on the CAM. The eggs were incubated for 48 h and photographed. Blood vessel density was quantified by counting the number of branching blood vessels. (B) Each rat aortic ring was placed in a collagen pre-coated 96-well plate, different CM was added to the wells. On day 6, the rings were analyzed by phase-contrast microscopy and microvessel outgrowths were quantified and photographed. Values are mean ± SD. *P<0.05, **P < 0.01 (n = 4, Student’s t-test) (TIFF 6100 kb)

Fig. S3

miR-211, miR-1226, miR-125a, miR-197 and miR-204 can repress tumor-induced angiogenesis. The methods were described as above in Fig. 4 and Fig. S2 (TIFF 15104 kb)

Fig. S4

miRNAs level could be regulated by siRNA-Dicer but not CYP4Z2P- and CYP4Z1-3’UTR. (A) The knockdown efficiency of siRNA-Dicer was examined by qRT-PCR. (B) MCF-7 cells were transfected with siRNA-Dicer to block the miRNA biogenesis pathway. Knocking down Dicer decreased levels of the miRNAs tested. (C) Levels of miRNAs were determined in MCF-7 cells transfected with Z2P-UTR or Z1-UTR by qRT-PCR. Little difference could be detected. (D) miRNA expression was analyzed in cells transfected with different miRNAs or a control oligo. Transfection with miRNA mimics increased mature miRNA levels. Values are mean ± SD. **P < 0.01 (n = 3, one-way ANOVA) (TIFF 9871 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, L., Li, X., Gu, Y. et al. The 3′UTR of the pseudogene CYP4Z2P promotes tumor angiogenesis in breast cancer by acting as a ceRNA for CYP4Z1. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150, 105–118 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3298-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3298-2

Keywords

Navigation