Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Racial disparities in risk of second breast tumors after ductal carcinoma in situ

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the impact of race/ethnicity on second breast tumors among women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We identified 102,489 women diagnosed with primary DCIS between 1988 and 2009 from the 18 NCI-SEER Registries. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate race/ethnicity-associated relative risks (RRs) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of ipsilateral breast tumors (IBT; defined as DCIS or invasive carcinoma in the ipsilateral breast) and contralateral breast tumors (CBT; defined as DCIS or invasive carcinoma in the contralateral breast). Overall, 2,925 women had IBT and 3,723 had CBT. Compared with white women, black (RR 1.46; 95 % CI 1.29–1.65), and Hispanic (RR 1.18; 95 % CI 1.03–1.36) women had higher IBT risk, which was similar for invasive IBT and ipsilateral DCIS. A significant increase in IBT risk among black women persisted, regardless of age at diagnosis, treatment, tumor grade, tumor size, and histology. The CBT risk was significantly increased among black (RR 1.21; 95 % CI 1.08–1.36) and Asian/PI (RR 1.16; 95 % CI 1.02–1.31) women compared with white women. The association was stronger for invasive CBT among black women and for contralateral DCIS among Asian/PI women (P heterogeneity < 0.0001). The black race-associated CBT risk was more pronounced among women ≥50 years at diagnosis and those with comedo DCIS; in contrast, a significant increase in risk among Asian/PI women was restricted to those <50 years and those with noncomedo DCIS. Racial/ethnic differences in risks of second breast tumors after DCIS could not be explained by pathologic features and treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM (2002) Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1546–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. US American Cancer Society (2010) Cancer Facts and Figures for 2010. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  3. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2010, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, based on November 2012 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2013. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/

  4. Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Wilkie H, Ballard-Barbash R (2000) Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Arch Intern Med 160:953–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL (2010) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:170–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Newman LA, Griffith KA, Jatoi I, Simon MS, Crowe JP, Colditz GA (2006) Meta-analysis of survival in African American and white American patients with breast cancer: ethnicity compared with socioeconomic status. J Clin Oncol 24:1342–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Clark AS, Giantonio BJ, Ross RN, Teng Y, Wang M, Niknam BA, Ludwig JM, Wang W, Even-Shoshan O, Fox KR (2013) Characteristics associated with differences in survival among black and white women with breast cancer. JAMA 310:389–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, Thun M (2004) Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 54:78–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Innos K, Horn-Ross PL (2008) Risk of second primary breast cancers among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:531–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I, Ljung BM, Ernster VL, Stewart K, Chew K, Moore DH II, Waldman F (2003) Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1692–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li CI, Malone KE, Saltzman BS, Daling JR (2006) Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988–2001. Cancer 106:2104–2112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith BD, Haffty BG, Buchholz TA, Smith GL, Galusha DH, Bekelman JE, Gross CP (2006) Effectiveness of radiation therapy in older women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1302–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bailes AA, Kuerer HM, Lari SA, Jones LA, Brewster AM (2013) Impact of race and ethnicity on features and outcome of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 119:150–157

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stark A, Stapp R, Raghunathan A, Yan X, Kirchner HL, Griggs J, Newman L, Chitale D, Dick A (2012) Disease-free probability after the first primary ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a comparison between African–American and White-American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131:561–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins LC, Achacoso N, Haque R, Nekhlyudov L, Fletcher SW, Quesenberry CP Jr, Schnitt SJ, Habel LA (2013) Risk factors for non-invasive and invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139:453–460

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson C, Bai H, Neboori H, Takita C, Motwani S, Wright JL, Hobeika G, Haffty BG, Jones T, Goyal S, Moran MS (2012) Multi-institutional experience of ductal carcinoma in situ in black vs white patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole breast radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:e279–e283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nassar H, Sharafaldeen B, Visvanathan K, Visscher D (2009) Ductal carcinoma in situ in African American versus Caucasian American women: analysis of clinicopathologic features and outcome. Cancer 115:3181–3188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Warren JL, Weaver DL, Bocklage T, Key CR, Platz CE, Cronin KA, Ballard-Barbash R, Willey SC, Harlan LC (2005) The frequency of ipsilateral second tumors after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS: a population based analysis. Cancer 104:1840–1848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Glynn RJ, Rosner B (2004) Methods to evaluate risks for composite end points and their individual components. J Clin Epidemiol 57:113–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baer HJ, Glynn RJ, Hu FB, Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Stampfer M, Rosner B (2011) Risk factors for mortality in the nurses’ health study: a competing risks analysis. Am J Epidemiol 173:319–329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lunn M, McNeil D (1995) Applying Cox regression to competing risks. Biometrics 51:524–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Danforth DN Jr (2013) Disparities in breast cancer outcomes between Caucasian and African American women: a model for describing the relationship of biological and nonbiological factors. Breast Cancer Res 15:208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Morris GJ, Mitchell EP (2008) Higher incidence of aggressive breast cancers in African–American women: a review. J Natl Med Assoc 100:698–702

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shamliyan T, Wang SY, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Kane RL (2010) Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010:121–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharaf Aldeen B, Feng J, Wu Y, Nassar Warzecha H (2013) Molecular subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ in African American and Caucasian American women: distribution and correlation with pathological features and outcome. Cancer Epidemiol 37:474–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou W, Jirstrom K, Johansson C, Amini RM, Blomqvist C, Agbaje O, Warnberg F (2010) Long-term survival of women with basal-like ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based cohort study. BMC Cancer 10:653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Baquet CR, Commiskey P (2000) Socioeconomic factors and breast carcinoma in multicultural women. Cancer 88:1256–1264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C (2002) Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:490–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cross CK, Harris J, Recht A (2002) Race, socioeconomic status, and breast carcinoma in the U.S: what have we learned from clinical studies. Cancer 95:1988–1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Du W, Simon MS (2005) Racial disparities in treatment and survival of women with stage I–III breast cancer at a large academic medical center in metropolitan Detroit. Breast Cancer Res Treat 91:243–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Enewold L, McGlynn KA, Zahm SH, Jatoi I, Anderson WF, Gill AA, Shriver CD, Zhu K (2013) Surveillance mammography among female Department of Defense beneficiaries: a study by race and ethnicity. Cancer 119:3531–3538

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Field TS, Doubeni C, Fox MP, Buist DS, Wei F, Geiger AM, Quinn VP, Lash TL, Prout MN, Yood MU, Frost FJ, Silliman RA (2008) Under utilization of surveillance mammography among older breast cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med 23:158–163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Fisher B, Costantino J, Redmond C, Fisher E, Margolese R, Dimitrov N, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Deutsch M, Ore L et al (1993) Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 328:1581–1586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Julien JP, Bijker N, Fentiman IS, Peterse JL, Delledonne V, Rouanet P, Avril A, Sylvester R, Mignolet F, Bartelink H, Van Dongen JA (2000) Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet 355:528–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jenks S (2014) Downgrading cancer definitions: overdiagnosis fuels the discussion. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju070

  36. Benson JR, Wishart GC (2013) Predictors of recurrence for ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery. Lancet Oncol 14:e348–e357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P, Hahn SM, Lee CN, Millon-Underwood S, Pike MC, Reed SD, Saftlas AF, Scarvalone SA, Schwartz AM, Slomski C, Yothers G, Zon R (2010) National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference statement: Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ September 22–24, 2009. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:161–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Mamounas E, Smith R, Begovic M, Dimitrov NV, Margolese RG, Kardinal CG, Kavanah MT, Fehrenbacher L, Oishi RH (1999) Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353:1993–2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Punglia RS, Saito AM, Neville BA, Earle CC, Weeks JC (2010) Impact of interval from breast conserving surgery to radiotherapy on local recurrence in older women with breast cancer: retrospective cohort analysis. BMJ 340:c845

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hershman DL, Wang X, McBride R, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI (2006) Delay in initiating adjuvant radiotherapy following breast conservation surgery and its impact on survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:1353–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Srokowski TP, Fang S, Duan Z, Buchholz TA, Hortobagyi GN, Goodwin JS, Giordano SH (2008) Completion of adjuvant radiation therapy among women with breast cancer. Cancer 113:22–29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Haque R, Achacoso NS, Fletcher SW, Nekhlyudov L, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Quesenberry CP Jr, Habel LA (2010) Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ among patients cared for in large integrated health plans. Am J Manag Care 16:351–360

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nakhlis F, Lazarus L, Hou N, Acharya S, Khan SA, Staradub VL, Rademaker AW, Morrow M (2005) Tamoxifen use in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and T1a/b N0 invasive carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 201:688–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Livaudais JC, Hershman DL, Habel L, Kushi L, Gomez SL, Li CI, Neugut AI, Fehrenbacher L, Thompson B, Coronado GD (2012) Racial/ethnic differences in initiation of adjuvant hormonal therapy among women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131:607–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hershman DL, Kushi LH, Shao T, Buono D, Kershenbaum A, Tsai WY, Fehrenbacher L, Gomez SL, Miles S, Neugut AI (2010) Early discontinuation and nonadherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in a cohort of 8,769 early-stage breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 28:4120–4128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Habel LA, Daling JR, Newcomb PA, Self SG, Porter PL, Stanford JL, Seidel K, Weiss NS (1998) Risk of recurrence after ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7:689–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. McLaughlin VH, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Newcomb PA, Sprague BL (2014) Lifestyle factors and the risk of a second breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:450–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kuerer HM, Lari SA, Arun BK, Hu CY, Brewster A, Mittendorf EA, Albarracin CT, Babiera GV, Caudle AS, Wagner JL, Litton JK, Bedrosian I, Meric-Bernstam F, Lucci A, Hunt KK (2012) Biologic features and prognosis of ductal carcinoma in situ are not adversely impacted by initial large body mass. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133:1131–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kwan ML, Kushi LH, Weltzien E, Tam EK, Castillo A, Sweeney C, Caan BJ (2010) Alcohol consumption and breast cancer recurrence and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer: the life after cancer epidemiology study. J Clin Oncol 28:4410–4416

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Y. L. was supported by the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation, St. Louis, Missouri. G. A. C. was also supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. M. S. G was supported by the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation, Siteman Cancer Center, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute Grant U54CA153460, and Washington University School of Medicine Faculty Diversity Scholars Program. The funding agency had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Liu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Colditz, G.A., Gehlert, S. et al. Racial disparities in risk of second breast tumors after ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148, 163–173 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3151-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-3151-z

Keywords

Navigation