Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Final results of a multicenter phase II clinical trial evaluating the activity of single-agent lapatinib in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and HER2-positive circulating tumor cells. A proof-of-concept study

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This multicenter phase II trial was designed to evaluate the activity of lapatinib in metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2-negative primary tumors and HER2-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs). In this study MBC patients with HER2-negative primary tumors and HER2-positive CTCs previously treated with at least a first-line therapy for metastatic disease received lapatinib 1500 mg/day. The CellSearch System® was used for CTCs isolation and bio-characterization. HER2 status was assessed on CTCs by immunofluorescence. A case was defined as CTCs positive if ≥2 CTC/7.5 ml of blood were isolated and HER2-positive if ≥50 % of CTCs were HER2-positive. 139 HER2-negative patients were screened, 96 patients were positive for CTCs (mean number of CTCs: 85; median number of CTCs: 19; range 2–1637). Seven of the 96 patients (7 %) had ≥50 % HER2-positive CTCs and were eligible for treatment with lapatinib. No objective tumor responses occurred in this population. In one patient, disease stabilization lasting 254 days (8.5 months) was observed. From the findings of this study, we concluded that a subset of patients with a HER2-negative primary tumor presents HER2-positive CTCs during disease progression, although the HER2 shift rate seems to be lower than previously reported. Despite the lack of objective response, the durable disease stabilization observed in one patient cannot rule out the hypothesis that lapatinib may have some activity in this patient population. However, considering that only 1/139 screened patients may potentially have derived benefit from this approach, future trials designed according to the presented strategy cannot be recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144(5):646–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zidan J, Dashkovsky I, Stayerman C, Basher W, Cozacov C, Hadary A (2005) Comparison of HER-2 overexpression in primary breast cancer and metastatic sites and its effect on biological targeting therapy of metastatic disease. Br J Cancer 93(5):552–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Edgerton SM, Moore D 2nd, Merkel D, Thor AD (2003) erbB-2 (HER-2) and breast cancer progression. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 11(3):214–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gancberg D, Di Leo A, Cardoso F, Rouas G, Pedrocchi M, Paesmans M et al (2002) Comparison of HER-2 status between primary breast cancer and corresponding distant metastatic sites. Ann Oncol 13(7):1036–1043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Curigliano G, Bagnardi V, Viale G, Fumagalli L, Rotmensz N, Aurilio G et al (2011) Should liver metastases of breast cancer be biopsied to improve treatment choice? Ann Oncol 22(10):2227–2233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Amir E, Miller N, Geddie W, Freedman O, Kassam F, Simmons C et al (2012) Prospective study evaluating the impact of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(6):587–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amir E, Clemons M, Purdie CA, Miller N, Quinlan P, Geddie W et al (2011) Tissue confirmation of disease recurrence in breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of multi-centre, multi-disciplinary prospective studies. Cancer Treat Rev

  8. Fehm T, Sagalowsky A, Clifford E, Beitsch P, Saboorian H, Euhus D et al (2002) Cytogenetic evidence that circulating epithelial cells in patients with carcinoma are malignant. Clin Cancer Res 8(7):2073–2084

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Terstappen LW, Rao C, Gross S, Weiss AJ (2000) Peripheral blood tumor cell load reflects the clinical activity of the disease in patients with carcinoma of the breast. Int J Oncol 17(3):573–578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC et al (2004) Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351(8):781–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cristofanilli M, Hayes DF, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Reuben JM et al (2005) Circulating tumor cells: a novel prognostic factor for newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(7):1420–1430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meng S, Tripathy D, Shete S, Ashfaq R, Haley B, Perkins S et al (2004) HER-2 gene amplification can be acquired as breast cancer progresses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(25):9393–9398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Riethdorf S, Müller V, Zhang L, Rau T, Loibl S, Komor M et al (2010) Detection and HER2 expression of circulating tumor cells: prospective monitoring in breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant GeparQuattro trial. Clin Cancer Res 16(9):2634–2645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fehm T, Müller V, Aktas B, Janni W, Schneeweiss A, Stickeler E et al (2010) HER2 status of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective, multicenter trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124(2):403–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Munzone E, Nolé F, Goldhirsch A, Botteri E, Esposito A, Zorzino L et al (2010) Changes of HER2 status in circulating tumor cells compared with the primary tumor during treatment for advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 10(5):392–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Flores LM, Kindelberger DW, Ligon AH, Capelletti M, Fiorentino M, Loda M et al (2010) Improving the yield of circulating tumour cells facilitates molecular characterisation and recognition of discordant HER2 amplification in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 102(10):1495–1502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Punnoose EA, Atwal SK, Spoerke JM, Savage H, Pandita A, Yeh RF et al (2010) Molecular biomarker analyses using circulating tumor cells. PLoS ONE 5(9):e12517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pestrin M, Bessi S, Galardi F, Truglia M, Biggeri A, Biagioni C et al (2009) Correlation of HER2 status between primari tumors and corresponding circulating tumor cells in advanced breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118(3):523–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sargent DJ, Chan V, Goldberg RM (2001) A three-outcome design for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 22:117–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allard WJ, Matera J, Miller MC, Repollet M, Connelly MC, Rao C et al (2004) Tumor cells circulate in the peripheral blood of all major carcinomas but not in healthy subjects or patients with nonmalignant diseases. Clin Cancer Res 10(20):6897–6904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riethdorf S, Fritsche H, Müller V, Rau T, Schindlbeck C, Rack B et al (2007) Detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a validation study of the CellSearch system. Clin Cancer Res 13(3):920–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.veridex.com/CellSearch/CSProducts/CTCKit.aspx

  24. http://www.veridex.com/pdf/17332_InstruBroch_HANDOUT.pdf

  25. Press MF, Slamon DJ, Flom KJ, Park J, Zhou J-Y, Bernstein L (2002) Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene amplification and overexpression: comparison of frequently used assay methods in a molecularly characterized cohort of breast cancer specimens. J Clin Oncol 20:3095–3105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology; College of American Pathologists. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(1):118–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guarneri V, Giovannelli S, Ficarra G, Bettelli S, Maiorana A, Piacentini F et al (2008) Comparison of HER-2 and hormone receptor expression in primary breast cancers and asynchronous paired metastases: impact on patient management. Oncologist 13(8):838–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meng S, Tripathy D, Shete S, Ashfaq R, Saboorian H, Haley B et al (2006) uPAR and HER-2 gene status in individual breast cancer cells from blood and tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(46):17361–17365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Solomayer EF, Becker S, Pergola-Becker G, Bachmann R, Krämer B, Vogel U et al (2006) Comparison of HER2 status between primary tumor and disseminated tumor cells in primary breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98(2):179–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Angelo Di Leo (Author # 16) and Fabio Puglisi (Author # 3) declare a consultant/advisory role with GlaxoSmithKline® and Roche®. Lorenzo Gianni (Author # 8) declares a consultant/advisory role with GlaxoSmithKline®. Other Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelo Di Leo.

Additional information

Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT00820924.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pestrin, M., Bessi, S., Puglisi, F. et al. Final results of a multicenter phase II clinical trial evaluating the activity of single-agent lapatinib in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and HER2-positive circulating tumor cells. A proof-of-concept study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134, 283–289 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2045-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2045-1

Keywords

Navigation