Abstract
Comprehensive genetic testing of the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 identified approximately 16% of variants of unknown significance (VUS), a significant proportion of which could affect the correct splicing of the genes. Our aim is to establish a workflow for classifying VUS in these complex genes, the first stage of which is splicing analysis. We used a combined approach consisting of five in silico splicing prediction programs and RT-PCR analysis for a set of 26 variants not previously studied at the mRNA level and six variants that had already been studied, four of which were used as positive controls as they were found to affect the splicing of these genes and the other two were used as negative controls. We identified a splicing defect in 8 of the 26 newly studied variants and ruled out splicing alteration in the remaining 18 variants. The results for the four positive and the two negative control variants were consistent with results presented in the literature. Our results strongly suggest that the combination of RNA analysis and in silico programs is an important step towards the classification of VUS. The results revealed a very high correlation between experimental data and in silico programs when using tools for predicting acceptor/donor sites but a lower correlation in the case of tools for identifying ESE elements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fackenthal JD, Cartegni L, Krainer AR, Olopade OI (2002) BRCA2 T2722R is a deleterious allele that causes exon skipping. Am J Hum Genet 71:625–631
Fackenthal JD, Olopade OI (2007) Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations. Nat Rev Cancer 7:937–948
Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, Bishop DT, Weber B, Lenoir G, Chang-Claude J et al (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 62:676–689
Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Liu Q, Cochran C, Bennett LM, Ding W et al (1994) A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 266:66–71
Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, Swift S, Seal S, Mangion J, Collins N, Gregory S, Gumbs C, Micklem G (1995) Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378:789–792
Liu HX, Cartegni L, Zhang MQ, Krainer AR (2001) A mechanism for exon skipping caused by nonsense or missense mutations in BRCA1 and other genes. Nat Genet 27:55–58
Mazoyer S, Puget N, Perrin-Vidoz L, Lynch HT, Serova-Sinilnikova OM, Lenoir GM (1998) A BRCA1 nonsense mutation causes exon skipping. Am J Hum Genet 62:713–715
Krawczak M, Reiss J, Cooper DN (1992) The mutational spectrum of single base-pair substitutions in mRNA splice junctions of human genes: causes and consequences. Hum Genet 90:41–54
Ars E, Serra E, Garcia J, Kruyer H, Gaona A, Lazaro C, Estivill X (2000) Mutations affecting mRNA splicing are the most common molecular defects in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Hum Mol Genet 9:237–247
Teraoka SN, Telatar M, Becker-Catania S, Liang T, Onengut S, Tolun A, Chessa L, Sanal O, Bernatowska E, Gatti RA et al (1999) Splicing defects in the ataxia-telangiectasia gene, ATM: underlying mutations and consequences. Am J Hum Genet 64:1617–1631
Zatkova A, Messiaen L, Vandenbroucke I, Wieser R, Fonatsch C, Krainer AR, Wimmer K (2004) Disruption of exonic splicing enhancer elements is the principal cause of exon skipping associated with seven nonsense or missense alleles of NF1. Hum Mutat 24:491–501
Vreeswijk MP, Kraan JN, van der Klift HM, Vink GR, Cornelisse CJ, Wijnen JT, Bakker E, van Asperen CJ, Devilee P (2009) Intronic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 that affect RNA splicing can be reliably selected by splice-site prediction programs. Hum Mutat 30:107–114
Agata S, De Nicolo A, Chieco-Bianchi L, D’Andrea E, Menin C, Montagna M (2003) The BRCA2 sequence variant IVS19+1G–>A leads to an aberrant transcript lacking exon 19. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 141:175–176
Brose MS, Volpe P, Paul K, Stopfer JE, Colligon TA, Calzone KA, Weber BL (2004) Characterization of two novel BRCA1 germ-line mutations involving splice donor sites. Genet Test 8:133–138
Claes K, Poppe B, Machackova E, Coene I, Foretova L, De Paepe A, Messiaen L (2003) Differentiating pathogenic mutations from polymorphic alterations in the splice sites of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 37:314–320
Keaton JC, Nielsen DR, Hendrickson BC, Pyne MT, Scheuer L, Ward BE, Brothman AR, Scholl T (2003) A biochemical analysis demonstrates that the BRCA1 intronic variant IVS10-2A-->C is a mutation. J Hum Genet 48:399–403
Pyne MT, Brothman AR, Ward B, Pruss D, Hendrickson BC, Scholl T (2000) The BRCA2 genetic variant IVS7+2T–>G is a mutation. J Hum Genet 45:351–357
Chen X, Truong TT, Weaver J, Bove BA, Cattie K, Armstrong BA, Daly MB, Godwin AK (2006) Intronic alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: effect on mRNA splicing fidelity and expression. Hum Mutat 27:427–435
Sanz DJ, Acedo A, Infante M, Duran M, Perez-Cabornero L, Esteban-Cardenosa E, Lastra E, Pagani F, Miner C, Velasco EA (2010) A high proportion of DNA variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 is associated with aberrant splicing in breast/ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 16(6):1957–1967
Vega A, Campos B, Bressac-De-Paillerets B, Bond PM, Janin N, Douglas FS, Domenech M, Baena M, Pericay C, Alonso C et al (2001) The R71G BRCA1 is a founder Spanish mutation and leads to aberrant splicing of the transcript. Hum Mutat 17:520–521
Hoffman JD, Hallam SE, Venne VL, Lyon E, Ward K (1998) Implications of a novel cryptic splice site in the BRCA1 gene. Am J Med Genet 80:140–144
Borg A, Haile RW, Malone KE, Capanu M, Diep A, Torngren T, Teraoka S, Begg CB, Thomas DC, Concannon P et al (2010) Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance in unilateral and bilateral breast cancer: the WECARE study. Hum Mutat 31:E1200–E1240
Baralle D, Lucassen A, Buratti E (2009) Missed threads. The impact of pre-mRNA splicing defects on clinical practice. EMBO Rep 10:810–816
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients described in this study for their willingness to participate and Asociación Española contra el Cáncer (AECC), which recognizes our group as one of the Grupos Estables de Investigación Oncológica 2010. Contract grant sponsor: Spanish Health Research Fund; Carlos III Health Institute; Catalan Health Institute and Autonomous Government of Catalonia. Contract grant numbers: ISCIIIRETIC: RD06/0020/1051, RD06/0020/1050, RD06/0020/0028, 2009SGR290, PI10/01422.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors Mireia Menéndez and Joan Castellsagué contributed equally to the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menéndez, M., Castellsagué, J., Mirete, M. et al. Assessing the RNA effect of 26 DNA variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132, 979–992 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1661-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1661-5