Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Age-specific trends of survival in metastatic breast cancer: 26 years longitudinal data from a population-based cancer registry in Stockholm, Sweden

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has evolved during the last decades but it is largely unknown whether this has led to improved survival in the general MBC population. Based on the regional, population-based breast cancer registry, we identified 5,463 patients diagnosed with MBC in Stockholm County during 1979–2004. Patients were divided into five cohorts based on the year of first MBC diagnosis and observed and relative survival were compared across the cohorts after adjustment for potential confounders. A significant trend of better survival over time was demonstrated for patients 60 years or younger (P < 0.001, by log-rank test for trend), but not for older patients (P = 0.12) or for the whole MBC population (P = 0.13). The adjusted observed survival of patients ≤60 years was significantly improved in the 2000–2004 cohort (P < 0.001, hazard ratio = 0.7, 95% confidence interval = 0.58–0.84), corresponding to a clinically significant increase of median survival with more than 3 months and absolute increase of 5-year survival with 8% or more compared to previous periods. Similarly, relative survival analysis indicated a 31% decreased mortality for the younger subpopulation in the 2000–2004 cohort (P < 0.001). Systemic adjuvant treatment was a negative prognostic factor after distant recurrence. Treatment advancements in MBC are not reflected by better survival for the whole MBC population. An improvement is only observed after the year 2000 and is restricted to younger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg L, Horner MJ, Howlader N, Eisner MP, Reichman M, Edwards BK (eds) (2007) SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2004. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/

  2. Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, Gatta G, Micheli A, Mangone L, Kunkler I (2007) Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000–02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Lancet Oncol 8(9):784–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JDF, Feuer EJ, The Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Collaborators (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(17):1784–1792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group E (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke M et al (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106

    Google Scholar 

  6. Largillier R, Ferrero JM, Doyen J, Barriere J, Namer M, Mari V, Courdi A, Hannoun-Levi JM, Ettore F, Birtwisle-Peyrottes I, Balu-Maestro C, Marcy PY, Raoust I, Lallement M, Chamorey E (2008) Prognostic factors in 1038 women with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 19(12):2012–2019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giordano SH, Buzdar AU, Smith TL, Kau S-W, Yang Y, Hortobagyi GN (2004) Is breast cancer survival improving? Cancer 100(1):44–52

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chia SK, Speers CH, D’yachkova Y, Kang A, Malfair-Taylor S, Barnett J, Coldman A, Gelmon KA, O’Reilly SE, Olivotto IA (2007) The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 110(5):973–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talbäck M (2009) The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register—a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol 48(1):27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Svenska Bröstcancergruppen (2008) Nationella riktlinjer för behandling av bröstcancer. http://www.swebcg.roc.se/Sidor/natriktlinjbrca2008.htm

  11. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric-estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50(3):163–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cox D (1972) Regression analysis and life tables. J R Stat Soc B 34(2):187–220

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ederer F, Heise H (1959) Instructions to IBM 650 programmers in processing survival computations. Methodological note No. 10. End Results Evaluation Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cuzick J (1985) A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med 4(1):87–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Parkin DM (2006) The evolution of the population-based cancer registry. Nat Rev Cancer 6(8):603–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Levine MN, Julian JA (2008) Registries that show efficacy: good, but not good enough. J Clin Oncol 26(33):5316–5319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith IE (2002) New drugs for breast cancer. Lancet 360(9335):790–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344(11):783–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, Snyder R, Mauriac L, Tubiana-Hulin M, Chan S, Grimes D, Anton A, Lluch A, Kennedy J, O’Byrne K, Conte P, Green M, Ward C, Mayne K, Extra J-M (2005) Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of Trastuzumab Combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: The M77001 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23(19):4265–4274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghersi D, Wilcken N, Simes RJ (2005) A systematic review of taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 93(3):293–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, Moiseyenko V, Ayoub J-P, Cervantes G, Fumoleau P, Jones S, Lui W-Y, Mauriac L, Twelves C, Van Hazel G, Verma S, Leonard R (2002) Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 20(12):2812–2823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller KD, Chap LI, Holmes FA, Cobleigh MA, Marcom PK, Fehrenbacher L, Dickler M, Overmoyer BA, Reimann JD, Sing AP, Langmuir V, Rugo HS (2005) Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(4):792–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, Dickler M, Cobleigh M, Perez EA, Shenkier T, Cella D, Davidson NE (2007) Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357(26):2666–2676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonneterre J, Mercier M (1993) Response to chemotherapy after relapse in patients with or without previous adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The French Epirubicin Study Group. Cancer Treat Rev 19(Suppl B):21–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Valagussa P, Tancini G, Bonadonna G (1986) Salvage treatment of patients suffering relapse after adjuvant CMF chemotherapy. Cancer 58(7):1411–1417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Crivellari D, Aapro M, Leonard R, von Minckwitz G, Brain E, Goldhirsch A, Veronesi A, Muss H (2007) Breast cancer in the elderly. J Clin Oncol 25(14):1882–1890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Eaker S, Dickman PW, Bergkvist L, Holmberg L (2006) Differences in management of older women influence breast cancer survival: results from a population-based database in Sweden. PLoS Med 3(3):e25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Professor Lars-Erik Rutqvist, former member of the Collaborative Stockholm Breast Cancer Group for his valuable comments during the planning of the study. This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Foundation; the Cancer Society in Stockholm; the Swedish Research Council; and the Stockholm County Council.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodoros Foukakis.

Additional information

This study is conducted on behalf of the Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 77 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foukakis, T., Fornander, T., Lekberg, T. et al. Age-specific trends of survival in metastatic breast cancer: 26 years longitudinal data from a population-based cancer registry in Stockholm, Sweden. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130, 553–560 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1594-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1594-z

Keywords

Navigation