Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Two new CHEK2 germ-line variants detected in breast cancer/sarcoma families negative for BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 gene mutations

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CHEK2 gene mutations occur in a subset of patients with familial breast cancer, acting as moderate/low penetrance cancer susceptibility alleles. Although CHEK2 is no longer recognized as a major determinant of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a hereditary condition predisposing to cancer at multiple sites, it cannot be ruled out that mutations of this gene play a role in malignancies arising in peculiar multi-cancer families. To assess the contribution of CHEK2 to the breast cancer/sarcoma phenotype, we screened for germ-line sequence variations of the gene among 12 probands from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families with one case of sarcoma that tested wild-type for mutations in the BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 genes. Two cases harbored previously unreported mutations in CHEK2, the c.507delT and c.38A>G, leading to protein truncation (p.Phe169LeufsX2) and amino acid substitution (p.His13Arg), respectively. These mutations were not considered common polymorphic variants, as they were undetected in 230 healthy controls of the same ethnic origin. While the c.38A>G encodes a mutant protein that behaves in biochemical assays as the wild-type form, the c.507delT is a loss-of-function mutation. The identification of two previously unreported CHEK2 variants, including a truncating mutation leading to constitutional haploinsufficiency, in individuals belonging to families selected for breast cancer/sarcoma phenotype, supports the hypothesis that the CHEK2 gene may act as a factor contributing to individual tumor development in peculiar familial backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Delia D, Buscemi G (2007) Regulation of cell cycle, cell cycle checkpoints, and cancer. In: Alison M (ed) The cancer handbook, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 36–46

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson SP, Bartek J (2009) The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461:1071–1078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoni L, Sodha N, Collins I et al (2007) CHK2 kinase: cancer susceptibility and cancer therapy—two sides of the same coin? Nat Rev Cancer 7:925–936

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buscemi G, Carlessi L, Zannini L et al (2006) DNA damage-induced cell cycle regulation and function of novel Chk2 phosphoresidues. Mol Cell Biol 26:7832–7845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meijers-Heijboer H, van den Ouweland A, Klijn J et al (2002) Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2 1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Nat Genet 31:55–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weischer M, Bojesen SE, Ellervik C et al (2008) CHEK2*1100delC genotyping for clinical assessment of breast cancer risk: meta-analyses of 26,000 patient cases and 27,000 controls. J Clin Oncol 26:542–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nevanlinna H, Bartek J (2006) The CHEK2 gene and inherited breast cancer susceptibility. Oncogene 25:5912–5919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Caligo MA, Agata S, Aceto G et al (2004) The CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation plays an irrelevant role in breast cancer predisposition in Italy. Hum Mutat 24:100–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Narod SA (2010) Testing for CHEK2 in the cancer genetics clinic: ready for prime time? Clin Genet 72:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Falchetti M, Lupi R, Rizzolo P et al (2008) BRCA1/BRCA2 rearrangements and CHEK2 common mutations are infrequent in Italian male breast cancer cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110:161–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Escudie P, Monteil-Onteniente S, Gladieff L et al (2010) A novel germline CHEK2 deletion truncating the kinase domain identified in a French family with high-risk of breast/ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:267–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dong X, Wang L, Taniguchi K et al (2003) Mutations in CHEK2 associated with prostate cancer risk. Am J Hum Genet 72:270–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cybulski C, Górski B, Huzarski T et al (2004) CHEK2 is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet 75:1131–1135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cybulski C, Wokołorczyk D, Kładny J et al (2007) Germline CHEK2 mutations and colorectal cancer risk: different effects of a missense and truncating mutations? Eur J Hum Genet 15:237–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gronwald J, Cybulski C, Piesiak W et al (2009) Cancer risks in first-degree relatives of CHEK2 mutation carriers: effects of mutation type and cancer site in proband. Br J Cancer 100:1508–1512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Robson M (2010) CHEK2, breast cancer, and the understanding of clinical utility. Clin Genet 78:8–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell DW, Varley JM, Szydlo TE et al (1999) Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Science 286:2528–2531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sodha N, Houlston RS, Bullock S et al (2002) Increasing evidence that germline mutations in CHEK2 do not cause Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Hum Mutat 20:460–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans DG, Birch JM, Narod SA (2008) Is CHEK2 a cause of the Li-Fraumeni syndrome? J Med Genet 45:63–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruijs MW, Broeks A, Menko FH et al (2009) The contribution of CHEK2 to the TP53-negative Li-Fraumeni phenotype. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 7:4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Manoukian S, Peissel B, Pensotti V et al (2007) Germline mutations of TP53 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer/sarcoma families. Eur J Cancer 43:601–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Birch JM, Hartley AL, Tricker KJ et al (1994) Prevalence and diversity of constitutional mutations in the p53 gene among 21 Li-Fraumeni families. Cancer Res 54:1298–1304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sullivan A, Yuille M, Repellin C et al (2002) Concomitant inactivation of p53 and Chk2 in breast cancer. Oncogene 21:1316–1324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartkova J, Guldberg P, Gronbaek K et al (2004) Aberrations of the Chk2 tumour suppressor in advanced urinary bladder cancer. Oncogene 23:8545–8551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SB, Kim SH, Bell DW et al (2001) Destabilization of CHK2 by a missense mutation associated with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome. Cancer Res 61:8062–8067

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaag A, Walsh T, Renbaum P et al (2005) Functional and genomic approaches reveal an ancient CHEK2 allele associated with breast cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Hum Mol Genet 14:555–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sodha N, Mantoni TS, Tavtigian SV et al (2006) Rare germ line CHEK2 variants identified in breast cancer families encode proteins that show impaired activation. Cancer Res 66:8966–8970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Falck J, Lukas C, Protopopova M et al (2001) Functional impact of concomitant versus alternative defects in the Chk2-p53 tumour suppressor pathway. Oncogene 20:5503–5510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jekimovs CR, Chen X, Arnold J et al (2005) Low frequency of CHEK2 1100delC allele in Australian multiple-case breast cancer families: functional analysis in heterozygous individuals. Br J Cancer 92:784–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson N, Fletcher O, Naceur-Lombardelli C et al (2005) Interaction between CHEK2*1100delC and other low-penetrance breast-cancer susceptibility genes: a familial study. Lancet 366:1554–1557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Byrnes GB, Southey MC, Hopper JL (2008) Are the so-called low penetrance breast cancer genes, ATM, BRIP1, PALB2 and CHEK2, high risk for women with strong family histories? Breast Cancer Res 10:208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Houlston RS, Peto J (2004) The search for low-penetrance cancer susceptibility alleles. Oncogene 23:6471–6476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC), the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata), the Danish Cancer Society, the Czech Ministry of Health (NS10282-3/2009), and the European Commission (projects DDResponse, Infla-Care, and Biomedreg/CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0030).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Radice.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

Immunohistochemical detection of Chk2 in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded breast tissues. a Normal breast tissue showing Chk2 expression, b breast carcinoma with wild-type CHEK2 showing Chk2 expression, c breast carcinoma from a CHEK2 1100delC germ-line carrier, showing grossly reduced levels of Chk2 protein, reflecting protein destabilization caused by the truncating mutation of one allele and the probable loss of the second allele (PPT 6150 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manoukian, S., Peissel, B., Frigerio, S. et al. Two new CHEK2 germ-line variants detected in breast cancer/sarcoma families negative for BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 gene mutations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130, 207–215 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1548-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1548-5

Keywords

Navigation