Abstract
The breast cancer susceptibility protein 1 (BRCA1) participates in the maintenance of cells genomic integrity through DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint, protein ubiquitination, and transcriptional regulation. The N-terminus of BRCA1 contains a RING domain that preferentially forms a heterodimeric complex with BARD1. The BRCA1–BARD1 RING complex has an E3 ubiquitin ligase activity that plays an essential role in response to DNA damage. Preclinical and clinical studies have recently revealed that structural changes to the heterodimer result in alterations to the BRCA1-mediated DNA repair pathways in cancer cells, and lead to hypersensitivity to several chemotherapeutic agents. It is of interest to approach the BRCA1 RING domain as a potentially molecular target for platinum-based drugs for cancer therapy. A previous study has shown that the anticancer drug cisplatin formed intramolecular and intermolecular BRCA1 adducts in which His117 was the primary platinum-binding site, and conferred conformational changes and induced thermostability. Here, we have studied the functional consequence of the in vitro platination of the BRCA1 RING domain by a number of platinum complexes. The BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase activity was inhibited by transplatin > cisplatin > oxaliplatin > carboplatin in that order. The consequences of the binding of the platinum complexes on the reactivity of the BRCA1 were also discussed. The data raised the possibility of selectively targeting the BRCA1 DNA repair for cancer therapy.
References
Huen MSY, Shirley MH, Chen J (2010) BRCA1 and its toolbox for the maintenance of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:138–148. doi:10.1038/nrm2831
O’Donovan PJ, Livingston DM (2010) BRCA1 and BRCA2: breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene products and participants in DNA double-strand break repair. Carcinogenesis 31:961–967. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgq069
Brzovic PS, Rajagopal P, Hoyt DW, King MC, Klevit RE (2001) Structure of a BRCA1-BARD1 heterodimeric RING-RING complex. Nat Struct Biol 8:833–837. doi:10.1038/nsb1001-833
Wu LC, Wang ZW, Tsan JT, Spillman MA, Phung A, Xu XL, Yang MCW, Hwang LY, Bowcock AM, Baer R (1996) Identification of a RING protein that can interact in vivo with the BRCA1 gene product. Nat Genet 14:430–440. doi:10.1038/ng1296-430
Hashizume R, Fukuda M, Maeda I, Nishikawa H, Oyake D, Yabuki Y, Ogata H, Ohta T (2001) The RING heterodimer BRCA1-BARD1 is a ubiquitin ligase inactivated by a breast cancer-derived mutation. J Biol Chem 276:14537–14540. doi:10.1074/jbc.C000881200
Xia Y, Pao GM, Chen H-W, Verma IM, Hunter T (2003) Enhancement of BRCA1 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity through direct interaction with the BARD1 protein. J Biol Chem 278:5255–5263. doi:10.1074/jbc.M204591200
Bergink S, Jentsch S (2009) Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 458:461–467. doi:10.1038/nature07963
Wu-Baer F, Ludwig T, Baer R (2010) The UBXN1 protein associates with autoubiquitinated forms of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor and inhibits its enzymatic function. Mol Cell Biol 30:2787–2798. doi:10.1128/MCB.01056-09
Mallery DL, Vandenberg CJ, Hiom K (2002) Activation of the E3 ligase function of the BRCA1/BARD1 complex by polyubiquitin chains. EMBO J 21:6755–6762. doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf691
Starita LM, Horwitz AA, Keogh MC, Ishioka C, Parvin JD, Chiba N (2005) BRCA1/BARD1 ubiquitinate phosphorylated RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem 280:24498–24505. doi:10.1074/jbc.M414020200
Eakin CM, MacCoss MJ, Finney GL, Klevit RE (2007) Estrogen receptor α is a putative substrate of the BRCA1 ubiquitin ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5794–5799. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610887104
Morris JR (2010) More modifiers move on DNA damage. Cancer Res 70:3861–3862. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0468
Morris JR, Boutell C, Keppler M, Densham R, Weekes D, Alamshah A, Butler L, Galanty Y, Pangon L, Kiuchi T, Ng T, Solomon E (2009) The SUMO modification pathway is involved in the BRCA1 response to genotoxic stress. Nature 462:886–890. doi:10.1038/nature08593
Ransburgh DJ, Chiba N, Ishioka C, Toland AE, Parvin JD (2010) Identification of breast tumor mutations in BRCA1 that abolish its function in homologous DNA recombination. Cancer Res 70:988–995. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2850
Wei L, Lan L, Hong Z, Yasui A, Ishioka C, Chiba N (2008) Rapid recruitment of BRCA1 to DNA double-strand breaks is dependent on its association with Ku80. Mol Cell Biol 28:7380–7393. doi:10.1128/MCB.01075-08
Ruffner H, Joazeiro CAP, Hemmati D, Hunter T, Verma IM (2001) Cancer-predisposing mutations within the RING domain of BRCA1: loss of ubiquitin protein ligase activity and protection from radiation hypersensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5134–5139. doi:10.1073/pnas.081068398
Amir E, Seruga B, Serrano R, Ocana A (2010) Targeting DNA repair in breast cancer: a clinical and translational update. Cancer Treat Rev. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.03.006
Tassone P, Martino MTD, Ventura M, Pietragalla A, Cucinotto I, Calimeri T, Bulotta A, Neri P, Caraglia M, Tagliaferri P (2009) Loss of BRCA1 function increases the antitumor activity of cisplatin against human breast cancer xenografts in vivo. Cancer Biol Ther 8:648–653. doi:10.4161/cbt.8.7.7968
Byrski T, Huzarski T, Dent R, Gronwald J, Zuziak D, Cybulski C, Kladny J, Gorski B, Lubinski J, Narod SA (2009) Response to neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:359–363. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0128-9
Price M, Monteiro ANA (2010) Fine tuning chemotherapy to match BRCA1 status. Biochem Pharmacol 80:647–653. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2010.05.015
Sun Y (2006) E3 ubiquitin ligases as cancer targets and biomarkers. Neoplasia 8:645–654. doi:10.1593/neo.06376
Hoeller D, Dikic I (2009) Targeting the ubiquitin system in cancer therapy. Nature 458:438–444. doi:10.1038/nature07960
Atipairin A, Canyuk C, Ratanaphan A (2010) Cisplatin affects the conformation of apo-form, not holo-form, of BRCA1 RING finger domain and confers thermal stability. Chem Biodivers 7:1949–1967. doi:10.1002/cbdv.200900308
Brzovic PS, Keeffe JR, Nishikawa H, Miyamoto K, Fox D III, Fukuda M, Ohta T, Klevit R (2003) Binding and recognition in the assembly of an active BRCA1/BARD1 ubiquitin-ligase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5646–5651. doi:10.1073/pnas.0836054100
Wu Z, Liu Q, Liang X, Yang X, Wang N, Wang X, Sun H, Lu Y, Guo Z (2009) Reactivity of platinum-based antitumor drugs towards a Met- and His-rich 20 mer peptide corresponding to the N-terminal domain of human copper transporter 1. J Biol Inorg Chem 14:1313–1323. doi:10.1007/s00775-009-0576-7
Frey U, Ranford JD, Sadler PJ (1993) Ring-opening reactions of the anticancer drug carboplatin: NMR characterization of cis-[Pt(NH3)2(CBDCA-O)(5′-GMP-N7)] in solution. Inorg Chem 32:1333–1340. doi:10.1021/ic00060a005
Davies MS, Berners-Price SJ, Hambley TW (2000) Slowing of cisplatin aquation in the presence of DNA but not in the presence of phosphate: improved understanding of sequence selectivity and the roles of monoaquated and diaquated species in the binding of cisplatin to DNA. Inorg Chem 39:5603–5613. doi:10.1021/ic000847w
Trynda-Lemiesz L, Kozøowski H, Keppler BK (1999) Effect of cis-, trans diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and DBP on human serum albumin. J Inorg Biochem 77:141–146. doi:10.1016/S0162-0134(99)00183-X
Jerremalm E, Videhult P, Alvelius G, Griffiths WJ, Bergman T, Eksborg S, Ehrsson H (2002) Alkaline hydrolysis of oxaliplatin-isolation and identification of the oxalato monodentate intermediate. J Pharm Sci 91:2116–2121. doi:10.1002/jps.10201
Casini A, Gabbiani C, Michelucci E, Pieraccini G, Moneti G, Dyson PJ, Messori L (2009) Exploring metallodrug-protein interactions by mass spectrometry: comparisons between platinum coordination complexes and an organometallic ruthenium compound. J Biol Inorg Chem 14:761–770. doi:10.1007/s00775-009-0489-5
Groessl M, Tsybin YO, Hartinger CG, Keppler BK, Dyson PJ (2010) Ruthenium versus platinum: interactions of anticancer metallodrugs with duplex oligonucleotides characterized by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. J Biol Inorg Chem 15:677–688. doi:10.1007/s00775-010-0635-0
Silver DP, Richardson AL, Eklund AC, Wang ZC, Szallasi Z, Li O, Juul N, Leong C-O, Calogrias D, Buraimoh A, Fatima A, Gelman RS, Ryan PD, Tung NM, Nicolo AD, Ganesan S, Miron A, Colin C, Sgroi DC, Ellisen LW, Winer EP, Garber JE (2010) Efficacy of neoadjuvant cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1145–1153. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4725
Font A, Taron M, Gago JL, Costa C, Sánchez JJ, Carrato C, Mora M, Celiz P, Perez L, Rodrίguez D, Gimenez-Capitan A, Quiroga V, Benlloch S, Ibarz L, Rosell R (2010) BRCA1 mRNA expression and outcome to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in bladder cancer. Ann Oncol. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq333
Quinn JE, James CR, Stewart GE, Mulligan JM, White P, Chang GK, Mullan PB, Johnston PG, Wilson RH, Harkin DP (2007) BRCA1 mRNA expression levels predict for overall survival in ovarian cancer after chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 13:7413–7420. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1083
Taron M, Rosell R, Felip E, Mendez P, Souglakos J, Ronco MS, Queralt C, Majo J, Sanchez JM, Sanchez JJ, Maestre J (2004) BRCA1 mRNA expression as an indicator of chemoresistance in lung cancer. Hum Mol Genet 13:2443–2449. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddh260
Aris SM, Farrell NP (2009) Towards antitumor active trans-platinum compounds. Eur J Inorg Chem 2009:1293–1302. doi:10.1002/ejic.200801118
Acknowledgments
This work was financial supported by grants of the Synchrotron Light Research Institute (Public organization) (1-2548/LS01), the National Research Council of Thailand (PHA530097S), and Prince of Songkla University (PHA530188S) We would like to thank Dr. Brian Hodgson for assistance with the English, and the Pharmaceutical Laboratory Service Center, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University for research facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atipairin, A., Canyuk, B. & Ratanaphan, A. The RING heterodimer BRCA1–BARD1 is a ubiquitin ligase inactivated by the platinum-based anticancer drugs. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126, 203–209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1182-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1182-7