Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing the cost of adjuvant anastrozole with the benefits of managing less patients with relapsed breast cancer

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prescribing anastrozole instead of tamoxifen increases initial adjuvant drug costs but there is an eventual saving as fewer patients will relapse. The effect of this saving depends on an accurate understanding of the cost of breast cancer relapse. We identified 232 patients relapsing between March 2000 and 2005. Seventy-seven were randomly selected for analysis of their entire hospital and community management costs from the date of relapse until death, or the end of the evaluation period (01/01/07). The mean cost per patient was £25,186 (95% CI £13,705–£33,821). The median survival from time of relapse was 40.07 months (range 0.5–73 months) and median total cost per patient was £31,402.62. Equating this figure with the difference in relapse rate (4.1%), initial drug cost (£4,773) gives an extra cost of £17,244/life year saved. This was the first adjuvant cost effectiveness analysis which included the community management activity of a subsequent relapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forbes JF, Cuzick J, Buzdar A, Tobias JS, Baum M (2008) Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) Trialists’ Group. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 100 months analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol 9(1):45–53. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70385-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coombes RC, Hall E, Gibson L, Paridaens R, Jassem J et al (2004) A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. N Engl J Med 350(11):1081–1092. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jakesz R, Jonat W, Gnant M et al (2005) Switching of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years’ adjuvant tamoxifen: combined results of ABCSG trial 8 and ARNO 95 trial. Lancet 366(9484):455–462. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67059-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 Collaborative Group, Thürlimann B, Keshaviah A, Coates AS, Mouridsen H, Mauriac L, Forbes JF et al (2005) A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 353:2747–2757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas R, Green J, Callam M (2006) Adjuvant breast cancer drugs—blockbusters or bankrupters? Br J Canc Manag 2(3):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mansel R, Locker G, Fallowfield L, Benedict A, Jones D, on Behalf of the ATAC Trialists’ Group (2007) Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole versus tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5 years completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial. Br J Cancer 97:152–161. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baum M, ATAC Trialists’ Group (2002) The ATAC (‘Arimidex’, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) adjuvant breast cancer trial in postmenopausal patients: factors influencing the success of patient recruitment. Eur J Cancer 38(15):1984–1986. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00154-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Puntoni M, Guglielmini P et al (2005) Switching to anastrozole versus continued tamoxifen treatment of early breast cancer: preliminary results of the Italian tamoxifen anastrozole trial. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5138–5147. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mouridsen H, Gershanovich M, Sun Y, Pérez-Carrión R et al (2001) Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 19(10):2596–2606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Remak E, Brazil L (2004) Cost of managing women presenting with stage IV breast cancer in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer 91(1):77–83. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Skedgel C, Rayson D, Dewar R, Potvin K, Younis T (2005) Economic evaluation of adjuvant hormonal options in post menopausal women with breast cancer: tamoxifen versus tamoxifen, then exemestane versus anastrozole. J Clin Oncol 23(16s):538 Abstract number 6040

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karnon J, Kerr GR, Jack W, Papo NL, Cameron DA (2007) Health care costs for the treatment of breast cancer recurrent events: estimates from a UK-based patient-level analysis. Br J Cancer 97(4):479–485. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolowacz S, Roskell N, Christie A, Kerr G, Cameron D (2005) The cost of hospital care for relapsed breast cancer in the UK based on a large patient-level resource utilisation dataset. Presented at the European Conference of the International Society for Pharmacoeconmics and Outcomes Research, Florence

  14. Department of Health (7 March 2005) NHS Reference Costs 2004. Available via http://www.dh.gov.uk. Accessed 17 June 2008

  15. British National Formulary (June 2007) Pharmaceutical Press, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, London

  16. Office for National Statistics Census 2001: Bedfordshire County. Available via: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/9.asp. Accessed 17 June 2008

  17. West Anglia Cancer Network Available via http://www.wacn.org.uk. Accessed 17 June 2008

  18. Bontenbal M, Creemers GJ, Braun HJ et al (2005) Phase II to III study comparing doxorubicin and docetaxel with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of a Dutch Community Setting Trial for the Clinical Trial Group of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre. J Clin Oncol 23(28):7081–7088. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.06.236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin M, Villar A, Sole-Calvo A, Gonzalez R, Massuti B et al (2003) Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group. Ann Oncol 14(6):833–842. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nabholtz JM, Buzdar A, Pollak M, Harwin W et al (2000) Anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results of a North American multicenter randomized trial. Arimidex Study Group. J Clin Oncol 18(22):3758–3767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC et al (2002) Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20(3):719–726. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.3.719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H et al (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792. doi:10.1056/NEJM200103153441101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (June 2008) Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. Available via http://www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2008

  24. Mauriac L, Keshaviah A, Debled M, Mouridsen H et al (2007) Predictors of early relapse in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor +ve breast cancer in the BIG-1-98 trial. Ann Oncol 18:859–867. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, Mauriac L et al (2001) Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for Erb B-1 and/or ErbB-2 positive, ER +ve primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomised trial. J Clin Oncol 19(18):3808–3816

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lønning PE, Geisler J, Krag LE, Erikstein B (2005) Effects of exemestane administered for 2 years versus placebo on bone mineral density, bone biomarkers, and plasma lipids in patients with surgically resected early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5126–5137. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.07.097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bonny Parkinson, senior Health economist at AstraZeneca for her support in preparing this paper. The study was originally supported by an unrestricted education grant from Sanofi-Aventis and AstraZeneca. Roche Pharmaceuticals generously paid for the retrospective testing of HER-2 on histological tissue samples, where necessary. We would like to thank Habib Carfare (Breast Surgeon, Bedford Hospital), Brendan O’Sullivan (Chief Pharmacist Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital), Nick Jones (Chief Pharmacist, Bedford Hospital), Juliet Morris (Trials Pharmacist, Bedford Hospital), Elizabeth Wiggins (Breast Specialist Nurse and Database Coordinator), the patient advisors within Bosom Pals, the North Bedfordshire general practitioners, hospice, district and Macmillan nurses, all of who assisted with the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, R.J., Williams, M., Glen, J. et al. Comparing the cost of adjuvant anastrozole with the benefits of managing less patients with relapsed breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117, 289–295 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0289-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0289-6

Keywords

Navigation