Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Differences in breast cancer biological characteristics between ethnic groups in New Zealand

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective To investigate differences in breast cancer biological characteristics between ethnic groups in Auckland, New Zealand. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Auckland Breast Cancer Study Group. Participants All people diagnosed with breast cancer in the greater Auckland area between 2000 and 2005 who agreed to participate (1,577). Main outcome measures Size, grade, lymph node status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), grade allowing for size, all compared with ethnicity. Results NZ Maori and Pacific Island participants had larger tumours (P < 0.0001), higher grade tumours (P < 0.0001) with more involved lymph nodes (P < 0.0001). When allowing for size, there was still an indication that NZ Maori people had higher grade tumours (P = 0.03). There was no difference in ER, PR and LVI between ethnic groups. Conclusion These data suggest differences in tumour biology related to ethnicity in the Auckland population and this has implications for breast cancer screening and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K et al (2006) Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 295:2492–2502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunningham JE, Butler WM (2004) Racial disparities in female breast cancer in South Carolina: clinical evidence for a biological basis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 88:161–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayanga AJ, Newman LA (2007) Investigating the phenotypes and genotypes of breast cancer in women with African ancestry: the need for more genetic epidemiology. Surg Clin North Am 87:551–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Masi CM, Olopade OI (2005) Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer: a multilevel perspective. Med Clin North Am 89:753–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ministry of Health (2002) Cancer in New Zealand: trends and projections. Ministry of Health, Wellington. http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/0/8e1d731682cab3d9cc256c7e00764a23?OpenDocument Accessed March 2006

  6. Lethaby AE, Mason BH, Holdaway IM, Kay RG (1992) Age and ethnicity as prognostic factors influencing overall survival in breast cancer patients in the Auckland region. Auckland Breast Cancer Study Group. N Z Med J 105:485–488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lawes CM, Tukuitonga CF, Scragg RK (1999) The epidemiology of breast cancer in Pacific women in New Zealand. N Z Med J 112:354–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Curtis E, Wright C, Wall M (2005) The epidemiology of breast cancer in Maori women in Aotearoa New Zealand: implication for screening and treatment. N Z Med J 118–1209/1298

  9. Furberg H, Millikan R, Dressler L, Newman B, Geradts J (2001) Tumor characteristics in African American and white women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 68:33–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Newman PD, Mason BH, Holdaway IM, Kay RG, Arthur JF, Hitchcock GC (1992) Incidence and clinical features of breast cancer in the Auckland region. N Z Med J 105:117–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lethaby AE, Mason BH, Holdaway IM, Kay RG (1992) Age and ethnicity as prognostic factors influencing overall survival in breast cancer patients in the Auckland region. N Z Med J 105:485–488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearce N, Foliaki S, Sporle A, Cunningham C (2004) Genetics, race, ethnicity and health. Br Med J 328:1070–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson TJ, Waller M, Ellis IO, Bobrow L, Moss S (2004) Influence of annual mammography from age 40 on breast cancer pathology. Hum Pathol 35:1251–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Korsching E, Packeisen J, Helms MW, Kersting C, Voss R, van Diest PJ et al (2004) Deciphering a subgroup of breast carcinomas with putative progression of grade during carcinogenesis revealed by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) and immunohistochemistry. Br J Cancer 90:1422–1428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Auckland Breast Cancer Study Group for the use of their database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgery, University of Auckland, Middlemore Hospital, PO Box 93311, Otahuhu, Auckland, 2105, New Zealand

    M. K. Weston, D. P. Moss, J. Stewart & A. G. Hill

Authors
  1. M. K. Weston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. P. Moss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. G. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Hill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weston, M.K., Moss, D.P., Stewart, J. et al. Differences in breast cancer biological characteristics between ethnic groups in New Zealand. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111, 555–558 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9813-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9813-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation