Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlation between genetic and biological aspects in primary non-metastatic breast cancers and corresponding synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the changes, if any, in the level of expression of a well defined panel of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis markers between the primary breast tumor and the corresponding synchronous lymph node metastasis from a population of patients with a comparable disease status, in terms of clinical features, and natural history.

Ninety pure invasive ductal carcinomas with 10 or more axillary lymph nodes involved and without evidence of distant metastasis were included in this study. Primary tumor and corresponding metastatic lymph node tissue specimens were evaluated for the expression of Cyclin B1, MMP1 metalloproteinase, ICAM-1, RARβ, Ki67, ER, PgR, p53, bcl-2 and c-erbB2 by immunohistochemistry using standard methods.

The bivariate Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated a close relationship between primary and matching corresponding metastatic node. A high grade of correlation has been maintained even when staining results where categorized as positive/negative according to each one marker cut-off level of staining expression.

We report the most extensive immunohistochemical analysis of biological determinants in a well defined population of patients with invasive ductal carcinomas and involvement of 10 or more axillary nodes and no distant metastasis. We found a close correlation between the primary tumor and corresponding metastatic node in terms of the expression of all 10 of the markers investigated in this study. The not complete concordance observed could be explained by the gene expression modulation by extrinsic factors and by the microenvironment in which the cancer cells reside.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Teixeira MR, Pandis N, Bardi G et’al (1995) Clonal heterogeneity in breast cancer: kariotypic comparisons of multiple intra- and extra-tumours samples from 3 patients. Int J Cancer 63:63–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Teixeira MR, Pandis N, Bardi G et’al (1996) Karyotypic comparisons of multiple tumours and macroscopically normal surrounding tissue samples from patients with breast cancer. Cancer Res 56:855–859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ et’al (2002) Gene-expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415(6871):530–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nemoto T, Vana J, Bedwani R et’al (1980) Management and survival of female breast cancer: results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons. Cancer 45:2917–2924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen LC, Kurisu W, Ljung BM et’al (1992) Heterogeneity for allelic loss in human breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:506–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nurse P (1990) Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature 344:503–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor WR, Stark GR (2001) Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene 20:1803–1815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakopoulou L, Giannopoulou I, Gakiopoulou H et’al (1999) Matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -3 in breast cancer: correlation with progesterone receptors and other clinicopathologic features. Hum Pathol 30:436–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogawa Y, Hirakawa K, Nakata B et’al (1998) Expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in invasive breast cancer reflects low growth potential, negative lymph node involvement, and good prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 4:31–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ et’al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(25):1999–2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arun B, Kilic G, Yen C et’al (2003) Correlation of bcl-2 and p53 expression in primary breast tumors and corresponding metastatic lymph nodes. Cancer 98:2554–2559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsutsui S, Ohno S, Murakami S et’al (2002) EGFR, c-erbB2 and p53 protein in the primary lesions and paired metastatic regional lymph nodes in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:383–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De la Haba-Rodriguez JR, Ruiz Borrego M, Gomez Espana A et’al (2004) Comparative study of the immunohistochemical phenotype in breast cancer and its lymph node metastatic location. Cancer Invest 22:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berardo MD, Elledge RM, de Moor C et’al (1998) Bcl-2 and apoptosis in lymph node positive breast carcinoma. Cancer 82:1296–1302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sierra A, Lloveras B, Castellsague X et’al (1995) Bcl-2 expression is associated with lymph node metastasis in human ductal breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 60:54–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Climent MA, Segui MA, Peiro G et’al (2001) Prognostic value of HER-2/neu and p53 expression in node-positive breast cancer. HER-2/neu effect on adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Breast 10:67–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knoop AS, Bentzen SM, Nielsen MM et’al (2001) Value of epidermal growth factor receptor, HER2, p53, and steroid receptors in predicting the efficacy of tamoxifen in high-risk postmenopausal breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 19:3376–3384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Korenaga D, Takesue F, Yasuda M et’al (2002) The relationship between cyclin B1 overexpression and lymph node metastasis in human colorectal cancer. Surgery 131(1 suppl):S114–S120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu XC, Sneige N, Liu X et’al (1997) Progressive decrease in nuclear retinoic acid receptor β messenger RNA level during breast carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 57:4992–4996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario R. D’Andrea.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D’Andrea, M., Limiti, M., Bari, M. et al. Correlation between genetic and biological aspects in primary non-metastatic breast cancers and corresponding synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 101, 279–284 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9300-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9300-2

Keywords

Navigation