Summary
Objective. To examine age-specific rates of breast cancer incidence among racial and ethnic groups in the United States.
Methods. Subjects were 363,801 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer diagnosed during 1994–1998 and reported in the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) data set. Variables analyzed included race, ethnicity, 5-year age group (from 10 years through 85+ years), and stage at time of diagnosis (localized, regional, distant). Incidence rates per 100,000 women were calculated for each 5-year age group and stratified by stage. Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by comparing each racial group with whites and Hispanics with non-Hispanics.
Results. Black women experience significantly higher breast cancer incidence up to the age of 40 years and significantly lower incidence after age 50 compared with white women of the same ages. This is called the ‘crossover’ effect. This shifting burden of higher incidence occurs at ages 35–39 for localized stage and at ages 55–59 for regional stage. For distant stage, black women of all ages experience higher incidence compared with white women. Similar crossover effects do not exist for American Indian (AI) or Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women compared with white women. Both AI and API women have significantly lower incidence of breast cancer compared with white women, and Hispanic women have significantly lower incidence compared with non-Hispanic women.
Conclusions. This study highlights racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates among US women. The crossover effect between black and white women, particularly the lower incidence of localized stage disease diagnosed in older black women, is a significant phenomenon that may be associated with screening practices, and has implications for public health planning and cancer control initiatives to reduce racial/ethnic disparities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A Jemal T Murray A Samuels A Ghafoor E Ward MT Thun (2002) ArticleTitleCancer statistics 2003 CA Cancer J Clin 53 5–26
R Pratap S Shousha (1998) ArticleTitleBreast carcinoma in women under the age of 50: relationship between p53 immunostaining, tumor grade, and axillary lymph node status Breast Cancer Res Treat 49 35–39
N Krieger (1990) ArticleTitleSocial class and the black/white crossover in the age-specific incidence of breast cancer: a study linking census-derived data to population-based registry records Am J Epidemiol 131 804–814
Howe HL, Chen VW, Hotes J, Wu XC, Correa C, Fulton JP (eds): In: Cancer in North America, 1994–1998, Volume One: Incidence. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL, April 2001
BK Edwards HL Howe LAG Ries et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAnnual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1999, featuring implications of age and aging on the US cancer burden Cancer 94 2766–2792
Ries LAB, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Edwards K (eds): In: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1998. National Cancer Institute, 2001
M Hakama (1969) ArticleTitleThe peculiar age specific incidence curve for cancer of the breast-Clemmesen’s hook Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 75 370–374
Uniform Data Standards Committee, Subcommittee on Methodologic Issues of Measuring Cancer Among Hispanics. Final Report of Atlanta Symposium, North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, 1996, p 19
http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/countypop. html, January 15, 2003
Percy C, Fritz A, Jack A, Shanmugarathan S, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S: International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O), 3rd ed. World Health Organization, 2000
Young JLJR, Roffers SD, Ries LAG, Fritz AG, Hurlbut AA (eds): In: SEER Summary Staging Manual-2000: Codes and Coding Instructions. National Cancer Institute, NIH Pub. No. 01-4969, Bethesda MD, 2001
MP Fay EJ Feuer (1997) ArticleTitleConfidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution Stat Med 16 791–801
KJ Rothman S Greenland (1998,) Modern Epidemiology EditionNumber2nd ed Lippincott-Raven Publishers Philadelphia 238
BA Jones EA Patterson L Calvocoressi (2003) ArticleTitleMammography screening in African American women: evaluating the research Cancer 97 2047
SA Hall B Rockhill (2002) ArticleTitleRace, poverty, affluence, and breast cancer [letter] Am J Publ Health 92 1559
JL Kelsey L Bernstein (1996) ArticleTitleEpidemiology and prevention of breast cancer Annu Rev Public Health 17 47–67
N Krieger (1989) ArticleTitleExposure, susceptibility, and breast cancer risk: a hypothesis regarding exogenous carcinogens, breast tissue development, and social gradients, including black/white differences in breast cancer incidence Breast Cancer Res Treat 13 205–223
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr50/nvsr50-10.pdf; May 2, 2003
LA Newman S Bunner K, Carolin et al. (2003) ArticleTitleEthnicity related differences in the survival of young breast carcinoma patients Cancer 97 IssueIDSuppl 258–272
Muir C, Waterhouse J, Mack T, et al. (eds): In: Cancer in Five Continents, Vol. 5. IARC Scientific Publication no. 88. International Agency for Research on Cancer and International Association of Cancer Registries, Lyon, France, 1987
Miller BA, Kolonel LN, Bernstein L,Young Jr JL, Swanson GM, West D, Key CR, Liff JM, Glover CD, Alexander GA, et al. (eds):␣In: Racial/Ethnic Patterns of Cancer in the United States 1988–1992. National Cancer Institute, 1996
N Breen DK Wagener ML Brown WW Davis R Ballard-Barbash (2001) ArticleTitleProgress in cancer screening over a decade: results of the cancer screening from the1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys J Natl Cancer Inst 93 1704–1713
J Swan N Breen RJ Coates BK Rimer NC Lee (2003) ArticleTitleProgress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey Cancer 97 1528–1540
Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System 2000, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 93: 1704–1713, 2001
Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS: Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989–1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991–1997) – Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. MMWR 48: SS-6, 1999
LA Brinton J Benichou MD Gammon DR Brogan R Coates JB Schoenberg (1997) ArticleTitleEthnicity and variation in breast cancer incidence Int J Cancer 73 IssueID3 349–355
DR Pathak JR Osuch J He (2000) ArticleTitleBreast carcinoma etiology: current knowledge and new insights into the effects of reproductive and hormonal risk factors in black and white populations Cancer 88 IssueIDSuppl 1230–1238
JR Palmer LA Wise NJ Horton LL Adams-Campbell L Rosenberg (2003) ArticleTitleDual effect of parity on breast cancer risk in African American women J Natl Cancer Inst 95 478–483
Hulstrom D (ed): Standards for Cancer Registries Volume II: Data Standards and Data Dictionary, 7th ed, Version 10. North American Association of Central cancer Registries, Springfield, IL, March 2002
Poe GS, Powell-Griner E, McLaughlin JK, Placek PJ, Thompson GB, Robinson K: Comparability of the death certificate and the 1986 national mortality follow-back survey. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health Stat volume 2, 1993
LN Kolonel MT Goodman (1992) ArticleTitleRacial variation in cancer: fact or artifact J Natl Cancer Inst 84 916–917
Rosenberg HM, Maurer JD, Sorlie PD, Johnson NJ, MacDorman MF, Hoyert DL, Spitler JF, Scott C: Quality of death rates by race and Hispanic origin: a summary of current research, 1999. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 128, September 1999
H Hogan (1993) ArticleTitleThe 1990 post-enumeration survey: operations and results J Am Stat Assoc 88 1047–1060
J Schultz (2003) ArticleTitleCancer rates change slightly with census data correction J Natl Cancer Inst 95 775–777
Howe HL, Carozza S, O’Malley C, et al. (eds): In: Cancer in US Hispanics/Latinos, 1995–2000. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL, December 2003
NAACCR Expert Panel in Hispanic Identification. Report of the NAACCR Expert Panel on Hispanic Identification 2003. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL, October 2003
Ries LA, Eisner MP. Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Edwards BK (eds): SEER Statistics Review, 1973–1999. National Cancer Institute, 2002
AM Marbella PM Layde (2001) ArticleTitleRacial trends in age-specific breast cancer mortality rates in US women Am J Publ Health 91 118–121
KC Chu RE Tarone OW Brawley (1999) ArticleTitleBreast cancer trends of black women compared with white women Arch Fam Med 8 521–528
VL Shavers ML Brown (2002) ArticleTitleRacial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment J Natl Cancer Inst 94 334–356
I Poola R Clark R DeWitty LD Leffall (2002) ArticleTitleFunctionally active estrogen receptor isoform profiles in the breast tumors of African American women are different from the profiles in breast tumors of Caucasian women Cancer 94 615–623
J Moormeirer (1996) ArticleTitleBreast cancer in black women Ann Intern Med 15 897–905
KC Chu WF Anderson A Fritz LA Ries OW Brawley (2002) ArticleTitleFrequency distributions of breast cancer characteristics classified by estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status for eight racial ethnic groups Cancer 92 37–45
DR Lannin HF Mathews J Mitchell MS Swanson FH Swanson MS Edwards (1998) ArticleTitleInfluence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial difference in late-stage presentation of breast cancer JAMA 279 1801–1807
CJ Bradley CW Given C Roberts (2002) ArticleTitleRace, socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment and survival J Natl Cancer Inst 94 IssueID7 490–504
Cancer Facts & Figures for African American 2000–2001. American Cancer Society, 2000
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joslyn, S.A., Foote, M.L., Nasseri, K. et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer rates by age: NAACCR Breast Cancer Project. Breast Cancer Res Treat 92, 97–105 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-2112-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-005-2112-y