Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Estimating the Instantaneous Drag–Wind Relationship for a Horizontally Homogeneous Canopy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mean drag–wind relationship is usually investigated assuming that field data are representative of spatially-averaged metrics of statistically stationary flow within and above a horizontally homogeneous canopy. Even if these conditions are satisfied, large-eddy simulation (LES) data suggest two major issues in the analysis of observational data. Firstly, the streamwise mean pressure gradient is usually neglected in the analysis of data from terrestrial canopies, which compromises the estimates of mean canopy drag and provides misleading information for the dependence of local mean drag coefficients on local velocity scales. Secondly, no standard approach has been proposed to investigate the instantaneous drag–wind relationship, a critical component of canopy representation in LES. Here, a practical approach is proposed to fit the streamwise mean pressure gradient using observed profiles of the mean vertical momentum flux within the canopy. Inclusion of the fitted mean pressure gradient enables reliable estimates of the mean drag–wind relationship. LES data show that a local mean drag coefficient that characterizes the relationship between mean canopy drag and the velocity scale associated with total kinetic energy can be used to identify the dependence of the local instantaneous drag coefficient on instantaneous velocity. Iterative approaches are proposed to fit specific models of velocity-dependent instantaneous drag coefficients that represent the effects of viscous drag and the reconfiguration of flexible canopy elements. LES data are used to verify the assumptions and algorithms employed by these new approaches. The relationship between mean canopy drag and mean velocity, which is needed in models based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations, is parametrized to account for both the dependence on velocity and the contribution from velocity variances. Finally, velocity-dependent drag coefficients lead to significant variations of the calculated displacement height and roughness length with wind speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albayrak I, Nikora V, Miler O, OHare M (2012) Flow-plant interactions at a leaf scale: effects of leaf shape, serration, roughness and flexural rigidity. Aquat Sci 74:267–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alben S, Shelley M, Zhang J (2002) Drag reduction through self-similar bending of a flexible body. Nature 420:479–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldocchi D, Meyers TP (1998) Turbulence structure in a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 43:345–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bou-Zeid E, Meneveau C, Parlange MB (2005) A scale-dependent Lagrangian dynamic model for large eddy simulation of complex turbulent flows. Phys Fluids 17:025105. doi:10.1063/1.1839152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cescatti A, Marcolla B (2004) Drag coefficient and turbulence intensity in conifer canopies. Agric For Meteorol 121:197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont S, Brunet Y, Jarosz N (2006) Eulerian modelling of pollen dispersal over heterogeneous vegetation canopies. Agric For Meteorol 141:82–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont S, Brunet Y (2008) Influence of foliar density profile on canopy flow: a large-eddy simulation study. Agric For Meteorol 148:976–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilov K, Morvan D, Accary G, Lyubimov D, Meradji S (2013) Numerical simulation of coherent turbulent structures and of passive scalar dispersion in a canopy sublayer. Comput Fluids 78:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaylord B, Blanchette CA, Denny MW (1994) Mechanical consequences of size in wave-swept algae. Ecol Monogr 64:287–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisalberti M, Nepf H (2004) The limited growth of vegetated shear layers. Water Resour Res 40:W07,502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleicher SC, Chamecki M, Isard SA, Pan Y, Katul GG (2014) Interpreting three-dimensional spore concentration measurements and escape fraction in a crop canopy using a coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian Stochastic model. Agric For Meteorol 194:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin F, de Langre E, Machado-Almeida B (2010) Drag reduction of flexible plates by reconfiguration. J Fluid Mech 650:319–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder DL, Speck O, Hurd CL, Speck T (2004) Reconfiguration as a prerequisite for survival in highly unstable flow-dominated habitats. J Plant Growth Regul 23:98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks BB, Hyson P, Moore CJ (1975) A study of eddy fluxes over a forest. J Appl Meteorol 14:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PS (1981) On the displacement height in the logarithmic velocity profile. J Fluid Mech 111:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katul GG (1998) An investigation of higher-order closure models for a forested canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 89:47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katul GG, Grönholm T, Launiainen S, Vesala T (2011) The effects of the canopy medium on dry deposition velocities of aerosol particles in the canopy sub-layer above forested ecosystems. Atmos Environ 45:1203–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legg BJ, Long IF (1975) Turbulent diffusion within a wheat canopy: II. Results and interpretation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 101:611–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhar M, Nepf HM (2011) Flow-induced reconfiguration of buoyant and flexible aquatic vegetation. Limnol Oceanogr 56:2003–2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Chamecki M, Isard SA (2014a) Large-eddy simulation of turbulence and paticle dispersion inside the canopy roughness sublayer. J Fluid Mech 753:499–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Follett E, Chamecki M, Nepf H (2014b) Strong and weak, unsteady reconfiguration and its impact on turbulence structure within plant canopies. Phys Fluids 26:105,102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton EG, Sullivan PP, Davis KJ (2003) The influence of a forest canopy on top-down and bottom-up diffusion in the planetary boundary layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 129:1415–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinard JDJP, Wilson JD (2001) First-and second-order closure models for wind in a plant canopy. J Appl Meteorol 40:1762–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggi D, Katul GG, Albertson JD (2004a) Momentum transfer and turbulent kinetic energy budgets within a dense model canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:589–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Albertson JD, Katul GG (2004b) The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queck R, Bienert A, Maas HG, Harmansa S, Goldberg V, Bernhofer C (2012) Wind fields in heterogeneous conifer canopies: parameterisation of momentum absorption using high-resolution 3D vegetation scans. Eur J For Res 131:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Shaw RH (1982) Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 22:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach MR, Thom AS (1981) Turbulence in and above plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:97–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago JL, Coceal O, Martilli A, Belcher SE (2008) Variation of the sectional drag coefficient of a group of buildings with packing density. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 128:445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting H, Gersten K (2000) Boundary-layer theory. Springer, Berlin, 799 pp

  • Seginer I (1974) Aerodynamic roughness of vegetated surfaces. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH, Patton EG (2003) Canopy element influences on resolved-and subgrid-scale energy within a large-eddy simulation. Agric For Meteorol 115(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH, Schumann U (1992) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogachev A, Kelly M (2015) On displacement height, from classical to practical formulation: stress, turbulent transport and vorticity considerations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. doi:10.1007/s10546-015-0093-x

  • Su HB, Shaw RH, Paw KT, Moeng CH, Sullivan PP (1998) Turbulent statistics of neutrally stratified flow within and above a sparse forest from large-eddy simulation and field observations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 88:363–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom AS (1971) Momentum absorption by vegetation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 97:414–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel S (1984) Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms. Am Zool 24:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD, Ward DP, Thurtell GW, Kidd GE (1982) Statistics of atmospheric turbulence within and above a corn canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 24:495–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD (1988) A second-order closure model for flow through vegetation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 42:371–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson NR, Shaw RH (1977) A higher order closure model for canopy flow. J Appl Meteorol 16:1197–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue W, Meneveau C, Parlange MB, Zhu W, Van Hout R, Katz J (2007a) A comparative quadrant analysis of turbulence in a plant canopy. Water Resour Res 43:W05,422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue W, Parlange MB, Meneveau C, Zhu W, Van Hout R, Katz J (2007b) Large-eddy simulation of plant canopy flows using plant-scale representation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124:183–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant AGS1005363.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    Ying Pan & Marcelo Chamecki

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

    Heidi M. Nepf

Authors
  1. Ying Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcelo Chamecki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heidi M. Nepf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Chamecki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Y., Chamecki, M. & Nepf, H.M. Estimating the Instantaneous Drag–Wind Relationship for a Horizontally Homogeneous Canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 160, 63–82 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0137-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0137-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation