Skip to main content
Log in

Momentum Absorption in Rough-Wall Boundary Layers with Sparse Roughness Elements in Random and Clustered Distributions

  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A wind-tunnel experiment has been used to investigate momentum absorption by rough surfaces with sparse random and clustered distributions of roughness elements. An unusual (though longstanding) method was used to measure the boundary-layer depth δ and friction velocity u * and thence to infer the functional relationship z 0/h = f(λ) between the normalised roughness length z 0/ h and the roughness density λ (where z 0 is the roughness length and h the mean height of the roughness elements). The method for finding u * is based on fitting the velocity defect in the outer layer to a functional form for the dimensionless velocity-defect profile in a canonical zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer. For the conditions investigated here, involving boundary layers over sparse roughness with strong local heterogeneity, this velocity-defect-law method is found to be more robust than several alternative methods for finding u * (uw covariance, momentum integral and slope of the logarithmic velocity profile).

The experimental results show that, (1) there is general agreement in the relationship z 0/h = f(λ) between the present experiment with random arrays and other wind-tunnel experiments with regular arrays; (2) the main effect of clustering is to increase the scatter in the z 0/h = f(λ) relationship, through increased local horizontal heterogeneity; (3) this scatter obscures any trend in the z 0/h = f(λ) relationship in response to clustering; and (4) the agreement between the body of wind-tunnel data (taken as a whole) and field data is good, though with scatter for which it is likely that a major contribution stems from local horizontal heterogeneity in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arya S.P.S. (1975). ‘A Drag Partition Theory for Determining the Large-Scale Roughness Parameter and Wind Stress on the Arctic Pack Ice’. J. Geophys. Res. 80:3447–3454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayotte K.W. and Hughes D.E. (2004). ‘Observations of Boundary-Layer Wind-Tunnel Flow Over Isolated Ridges of Varying Steepness and Roughness’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 112:525–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor G.K. (1967). An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 615 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet Y., Finnigan J.J., and Raupach M.R. (1994). ‘A wind-tunnel study of air-flow in Waving Wheat: Single-Point Velocity Statistics’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 70:95–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauser F.H. (1956). ‘The Turbulent Boundary Layer’. Adv. Appl. Mech. 4:1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt J.R.: 1977, Aerodynamic Roughness and Mean Monthly Surface Stress over Australia, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Physics Technical Paper 29, CSIRO, Melbourne.

  • Hinze J.O. (1975). Turbulence. McGraw-Hill, New York, 790 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes D. E. and Böhm M.: 2000, A Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Pye Laboratory Wind Tunnel, CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report 10/00.

  • Marshall J.K. (1971). ‘Drag Measurements in Roughness Arrays of Varying Density and Distribution’. Agric. Meteorol. 8:269–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minvielle F., Marticorena B., Gillette D.A., Lawson R.E., Thompson R., and Bergametti G. (2003).‘Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Roughness Length and the Roughness Density in Cases of Low Roughness Density’ Environ. Fluid Mech. 3:249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach M.R. (1992). ‘Drag and Drag Partition on Rough Surfaces’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 60:375–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach M.R. (1994). ‘Simplified Expressions for Vegetation Roughness Length and Zero-plane Displacement as Functions of Canopy Height and Area Index’, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 71:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach M.R., Thom A.S., and Edwards I. (1980). ‘A Wind-Tunnel Study of Turbulent Flow Close to Regularly Arrayed Rough Surfaces’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 18:373–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach M.R., Coppin P.A., and Legg B.J. (1986). ‘Experiments on Scalar Dispersion within a Model Plant canopy, Part I: The Turbulence Structure’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 35:21–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raupach M.R., Antonia R.A., and Rajagopalan S. (1991). ‘Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers’. Appl. Mech. Rev. 44: 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I. (1974). ‘Aerodynamic Roughness of Vegetated Surfaces’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 5:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennekes H. and Lumley J.L. (1972). A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 300 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooding R.A., Bradley E.F., and Marshall J.K. (1973). ‘Drag Due to Regular Arrays of Roughness Elements of Varying Geometry’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaglom A.M. (1979). ‘Similarity Laws for Constant-Pressure and Pressure-Gradient Turbulent Wall Flows’. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11:505–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Raupach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raupach, M.R., Hughes, D.E. & Cleugh, H.A. Momentum Absorption in Rough-Wall Boundary Layers with Sparse Roughness Elements in Random and Clustered Distributions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120, 201–218 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9058-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9058-4

Keywords

Navigation