Skip to main content
Log in

Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders by tandem mass spectrometry in North East Italy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease

Abstract

Background

Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) are inborn errors of metabolism resulting from 50 different inherited disorders. The increasing availability of treatments and the importance of early intervention have stimulated newborn screening (NBS) to diagnose LSDs and permit early intervention to prevent irreversible impairment or severe disability. We present our experience screening newborns in North East Italy to identify neonates with Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) and Pompe, Fabry, and Gaucher diseases.

Methods

Activities of acid β-glucocerebrosidase (ABG; Gaucher), acid α-glucosidase (GAA; Pompe), acid α-galactosidase (GLA; Fabry), and acid α-L-iduronidase (IDUA; MPS-I) in dried blood spots (DBS) from all newborns during a 17-month period were determined by multiplexed tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) using the NeoLSD® assay system. Enzymatic activity cutoff values were determined from 3500 anonymous newborn DBS. In the screening study, samples were retested if the value was below cutoff and a second spot was requested, with referral for confirmatory testing and medical evaluation if a low value was obtained.

Results

From September 2015 to January 2017, 44,411 newborns were screened for the four LSDs. We recalled 40 neonates (0.09%) for collection of a second DBS. Low activity was confirmed in 20, who had confirmatory testing. Ten of 20 had pathogenic mutations: two Pompe, two Gaucher, five Fabry, and one MPS-I. The incidences of Pompe and Gaucher diseases were similar (1/22,205), with Fabry disease the most frequent (1/8882) and MPS-I the rarest (1/44411). The combined incidence of the four disorders was 1/4411 births.

Conclusions

Simultaneously determining multiple enzyme activities by MS/MS, with a focus on specific biochemical markers, successfully detected newborns with LSDs. The high incidence of these disorders supports this screening program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABG:

Acid β-glucocerebrosidase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

CPK:

Creatine phosphokinase

CRIM:

Cross-reactive immunological material

DBS:

Dried blood spot

EA:

Ethyl acetate

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

ENBS:

Expanded newborn screening

ERT:

Enzyme replacement therapy

GAA:

Acid α-glucosidase

GlcSPh:

Glucosylsphingosine

IDUA:

Acid α-L-iduronidase

LSD:

Lysosomal storage disease

LysoGb3:

Globotriaosylsphingosine

MeOH:

Methanol

MOM:

Multiple of the median

MPS I:

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I

NBS:

Newborn screening

MRM:

Multiple reaction monitoring

PPV:

Positive predictive value

References

  • Al-Sannaa NA, Bay L, Barbouth DS et al (2015) Early treatment with laronidase improves clinical outcomes in patients with attenuated MPS I: a retrospective case series analysis of nine sibships. Orphanet J Rare Dis 10:131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burton BK, Charrow J, Hoganson GE et al (2017) Newborn screening for Lysosomal storage disorders in Illinois: the initial 15-month experience. J Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.06.048

  • Chien YH, Lee NC, Thurberg BL et al (2009) Pompe disease in infants: improving the prognosis by newborn screening and early treatment. Pediatrics 124:e1116–1125

  • Clarke LA, Atherton AM, Burton BK et al (2017) Mucopolysaccharidosis type I newborn screening: best practices for diagnosis and management. J Pediatr 182:363–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dionisi-Vici C, Rizzo C, Burlina AB et al (2002) Inborn errors of metabolism in the Italian pediatric population: a national retrospective survey. J Pediatr 140:321–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott S, Buroker N, Cournoyer JJ et al (2016) Pilot study of newborn screening for six lysosomal storage diseases using Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Mol Genet Metab 118:304–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira S, Ortiz A, Germain DP et al (2015) The alpha-galactosidase A p.Arg118Cys variant does not cause a Fabry disease phenotype: data from individual patients and family studies. Mol Genet Metab 114:248–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JM (2006) Screening for lysosomal storage disorders–a clinical perspective. J Inherit Metab Dis 29:405–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller M, Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ (2006) Epidemiology of lysosomal storage diseases: an overview. In: Mehta A, Beck M, Sunder-Plassmann G (eds) Fabry disease: perspectives from 5 years of FOS. Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb MH, Scott CR, Turecek F (2015) Newborn screening for lysosomal storage diseases. Clin Chem 61:335–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Germain DP, Brand E, Cecchi F et al (2017) The phenotypic characteristics of the p.N215S Fabry disease genotype in male and female patients: a multi-center Fabry Registry study. Mol Genet Metab 12:S51–S52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann GF, Lindner M, Loeber JG (2014) 50 years of newborn screening. J Inherit Metab Dis 37:163–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins PV, Campbell C, Klug T, Rogers S, Raburn-Miller J, Kiesling J (2015) Lysosomal storage disorder screening implementation: findings from the first six months of full population pilot testing in Missouri. J Pediatr 166:172–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu TR, Hung SC, Chang FP et al (2016) Later onset Fabry disease, cardiac damage progress in silence: experience with a highly prevalent mutation. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:2554–2563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper AR, Green NS, Calonge N et al (2014) Decision-making process for conditions nominated to the recommended uniform screening panel: statement of the US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. Genet Med 16:183–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AD, Futerman AH (2013) Lysosomal storage disorders: old diseases, present and future challenges. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 11(Suppl 1):59–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubaski F, Mason RW, Nakatomi A et al (2017) Newborn screening for mucopolysaccharidoses: a pilot study of measurement of glycosaminoglycans by tandem mass spectrometry. J Inherit Metab Dis 40:151–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar AB, Masi S, Ghomashchi F et al (2015) Tandem mass spectrometry has a larger analytical range than fluorescence assays of lysosomal enzymes: Application to newborn screening and diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidoses types II, IVA, and VI. Clin Chem 61:1363–1371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Landau YE, Wiasbren SE, Chan LM, Levy HL (2017) Long-term outcome of expanded newborn screening at boston children’s hospital: benefits and challenges in fefinig true diseases. J Inherit Metab Dis 40:209–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenders M, Weidemann F, Kurschat C et al (2016) Alpha-galactosidase A p.A143T, a non-Fabry disease-causing variant. Orphanet J Rare Dis 11:54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Scott CR, Chamoles NA et al (2004) Direct Multiplex Assay of Lysosomal Enzymes in Dried Blood Spots for Newborn Screening. Clin Chem 50:1785–1796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H-C, Chan MJ, Yang CF, et al (2017) Mass spectrometry but not fluorimetry distinguishes affected and pseudodeficiency patients in newborn screening for Pompe disease. Clin Chem 63:1271-1277

  • Liao H-C, Chiang CC, Niu DM et al (2014) Detecting multiple lysosomal storage diseases by tandem mass spectrometry–a national newborn screening program in Taiwan. Clin Chim Acta 431:80–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H-C, Huang Y-H, Chen Y-J et al (2013) Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lysoGb3) could be a biomarker for Fabry disease with a Chinese hotspot late-onset mutation (IVS4 + 919G>A). Clin Chim Acta 426:114–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lisi EC, McCandless SE (2016) Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders: views of genetic healthcare providers. J Genet Couns 25:373–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden D, Levy H (2010) Newborn screening of lysosomal storage disorders. Clin Chem 56:1071–1079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mashima R, Sakai E, Kosuga M, Okuyama T (2016) Levels of enzyme activities in six lysosomal storage diseases in Japanese neonates determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Genet Metab Rep 9:6–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Matern D, Gavrilov D, Oglesbee D, Raymond K, Rinaldo P, Tortorelli S (2015) Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders. Semin Perinatol 39:206–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mechtler TP, Stary S, Metz TF et al (2012) Neonatal screening for lysosomal storage disorders: feasibility and incidence from a nationwide study in Austria. Lancet 379:335–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Clague AE, Carey WF (1999) Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 281:249–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry PK (2012) Genetics and diagnosis of Gaucher disease. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 10:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugesan V, Chuang WL, Liu J et al (2016) Glucosylsphingosine is a key biomarker of Gaucher disease. Am J Hematol 91:1082–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete-Martinez JI, Limon-Rojas AE, Gaytan-Garcia MJ et al (2017) Newborn screening for six lysosomal storage disorders in a cohort of Mexican patients: three-year findings from a screening program in a closed Mexican health system. Mol Genet Metab 121:16–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orsini JJ, Morrissey MA, Slavin LN et al (2009) Implementation of newborn screening for Krabbe disease: population study and cutoff determination. Clin Biochem 42:877–884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paciotti S, Persichetti E, Pagliardini S et al (2012) First pilot newborn screening for four lysosomal storage diseases in an Italian region: identification and analysis of a putative causative mutation in the GBA gene. Clin Chim Acta 413:1827–1831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Ouyang Y, Wang Z et al (2016) Genotype: a crucial but not unique factor affecting the clinical phenotypes in Fabry disease. PLoS One 11:e0161330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peake RW, Marsden DL, Bodamer OA, Gelb MH, Millington DS, Wijburg F (2016) Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders: Quo Vadis? Clin Chem 62:1430–1438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Polo G, Burlina AP, Kolamunnage TB et al (2017) Diagnosis of sphingolipidoses: a new simultaneous measurement of lysosphingolipids by LC-MS/MS. Clin Chem Lab Med 55:403–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz ML, Tecedor L, Chang M, Davidson BL (2011) Clarifying lysosomal storage diseases. Trends Neurosci 34:401–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scott CR, Elliott S, Buroker N et al (2013) Identification of infants at risk for developing Fabry, Pompe, or mucopolysaccharidosis-I from newborn blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry. J Pediatr 163:498–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Serebrinsky G, Calvo M, Fernandez S et al (2015) Late onset variants in Fabry disease: Results in high risk population screenings in Argentina. Mol Genet Metab Rep 4:19–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S (2016) Status of screening for recommended disorders in the US Conference Status of screening for recommended disorders in the US, Jefferson City, MO. Accessed 28 Feb 2017

  • Spada M, Pagliardini S, Yasuda M et al (2006) High incidence of later-onset fabry disease revealed by newborn screening. Am J Hum Genet 79:31–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tebani A, Zanoutene-Cheriet L, Adjtoutah Z, et al (2016) Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I in an Algerian series. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050743

  • Villoria IG, Pajares S, Lopez MR, Marin JL, Ribes A (2016) Neonatal screening for inherited metabolic diseases in 2016. Semin Pediatr Neurol 23:257–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcken B, Wiley V, Hammond J, Carpenter K (2003) Screening nrwborns for inborn errors of metabolism by tandem mass-spectrometry. N Engl J Med 348:2304–2312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wraith JE (2002) Lysosomal disorders. Semin Neonatol 7:75–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank PerkinElmer, who provided the reagent kit and technical support for this study. We also thank Ray Hill, an independent medical writer on behalf of Springer Healthcare Communications, who provided medical writing support funded by Cometa A.S.M.M.E. – Associazione Studio Malattie Metaboliche Ereditarie – ONLUS. Sheridan Henness, PhD, of Springer Healthcare Communications assisted with post-submission revisions of the manuscript, which were funded by Cometa A.S.M.M.E. – Associazione Studio Malattie Metaboliche Ereditarie – ONLUS.

Funding

Medical writing support was funded by Cometa A.S.M.M.E. – Associazione Studio Malattie Metaboliche Ereditarie – ONLUS, Padova Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto B. Burlina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Alberto B Burlina has received speaker honoraria and travel support from Sanofi Genzyme, Biomarin and Actelion. He is a member of the European Advisory Board of Nutricia Danone and Biomarin.

Alessandro P Burlina has received speaker honoraria and travel support from Sanofi Genzyme and Amicus Therapeutics. He is a member of the European Advisory Board of the Fabry Registry, which is sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme.

Giulia Polo has received speaker honoraria and travel support from PerkinElmer and Actelion.

Bruno Bembi has received speaker honoraria and travel support from Sanofi Genzyme, and Actelion.

Giovanni Duro has received speaker honoraria, travel support and research grants from Sanofi Genzyme.

Robert J Desnick is a consultant for Sanofi Genzyme, Amicus Therapeutics, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, and Sangamo Therapeutics and receives research support from Sanofi Genzyme and Sangamo Therapeutics, and has founder stock in Amicus Therapeutics.

Leonardo Salviati, Roberta Zordan, Chiara Cazzorla, Laura Rubert, Carmela Zizzo, and Andrea Dardis, declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by: Piero Rinaldo

Electronic supplementary material

Figure S1

(DOCX 361 kb)

Table S1

(DOCX 34.2 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burlina, A.B., Polo, G., Salviati, L. et al. Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders by tandem mass spectrometry in North East Italy. J Inherit Metab Dis 41, 209–219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-017-0098-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-017-0098-3

Navigation