Skip to main content
Log in

Newborn screening for lysosomal storage diseases: an ethical and policy analysis

  • SSIEM Symposium 2011
  • Published:
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease

Abstract

The traditional focus of newborn screening (NBS) is testing infants for medical conditions like phenylketonuria (PKU) that may cause significant morbidity or mortality unless treatment is initiated early. Although the Wilson and Jungner criteria were not designed specifically for NBS, the public health screening criteria have been used, with some modifications, to justify what conditions are included in a universal NBS panel. These criteria are being challenged by platform technologies like tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) that allow for the identification of numerous conditions on a single sample because they identify many conditions and variants simultaneously, some of which meet and others which fail to meet the criteria. In this manuscript, I evaluate three lysosomal storage diseases included in this multiplex screening test—Pompe disease, Fabry disease, and Krabbe disease. I show that they fail to meet some of the critical Wilson and Jungner criteria and thus are not ready for inclusion in universal NBS panels. Rather, screening for these conditions should only be performed in the research context with institutional review board approval and parental permission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAP:

American Academy of Pediatrics

ACMG:

American College of Medical Genetics

alpha-GAL A:

alpha-Galactosidase A

ASHG:

American Society of Human Genetics

CPS:

Canadian Paediatric Society

CRIM:

Cross-reactive immunologic material

ERT:

Enzyme replacement therapy

FD:

Fabry disease

GAA:

acid-alpha Glucosidase

GALC:

beta-galactocerebrosidase

HSCT:

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

IRB:

Institutional Review Board

KD:

Krabbe disease

LSD:

Lysosomal storage disease

MS/MS:

Tandem mass spectrometry

NBS:

Newborn Screening

NY:

New York

PD:

Pompe disease

PKU:

Phenylketonuria

SACHDNC:

Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children

UK:

United Kingdom

US:

United States

References

  • Alexander D, van Dyck PC (2006) A vision of the future of newborn screening. Pediatr 117(5 Pt 2):S350–S354

    Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Bioethics (2001) Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics. Pediatr 107:1451–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Dery V (2008) Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bulletin World Health Org 86(4):317–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews LL, Fullarton JE, Holtzman NA, Motulsky AG, and the Committee on Assessing Genetic Risks, Institute of Medicine (IOM) (eds) (1994) Assessing genetic risks: implications for health and social policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold GL, VanHove J, Freedenberg D et al. (2009) A Delphi clinical practice protocol for the management of very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Mol Gen Metab 96:85–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ASHG/ACMG American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG)/American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) (1995) Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Amer J Hum Genet 57:1233–1241

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DB, Beskow LM, Davis AM, Skinner D (2006) Changing perspectives on the benefits of newborn screening. Mental Retard Develop Disabil Res Rev 12:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashore L (2004) Childhood and adolescent cancer survivors' knowledge of their disease and effects of treatment. J Pediatric Onc Nurs 21:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) Bioethics Committee and the Ethics and Public Policy Committee, Canadian College of Medical Geneticists (2003) Guidelines for genetic testing of healthy children. Paediatr Child Health 8(1):42–45, Reaffirmed February 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Caniglia M, Rana I, Pinto RM et al. (2002) Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for infantile globoid-cell leukodystrophy (Krabbe's disease). Pediatr Transplant 6(5):427–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrapani A, Vellodi A, Robinson P, Jones S, Wraith JE (2010) Treatment of infantile Pompe disease with alglucosidase alpha: the UK experience. J Inherit Metab Dis 33:747–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LR, Chen CA, Chiu SN et al. (2009) Reversal of cardiac dysfunction after enzyme replacement in patients with infantile-onset Pompe disease. J Pediatr 155:271–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chien YH, Chiang SC, Zhang XK et al. (2008) Early detection of Pompe disease by newborn screening is feasible: results from the Taiwan screening program. Pediatr 122(1):e39–e45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien YH, Lee NC, Huang HJ, Thurberg BL, Tsai FJ, Hwu WL (2011) Later-Onset Pompe disease: early detection and early treatment initiation enabled by newborn screening. J Pediatr 158:1023–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dajnoki A, Muhl A, Fekete G et al. (2008) Newborn screening for Pompe disease by measuring GAA activity using tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 54:1624–1629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duffner PK, Caggana M, Orsini JJ et al. (2009a) Newborn screening for Krabbe disease: the New York State model. Pediatr Neurol 40:245–252, discussion 253-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffner PK, Jalal K, Carter RL (2009b) The hunger’s hope Krabbe family database. Pediatr Neurol 40:13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffner PK, Caviness VS, Erbe RW et al. (2009c) The long-term outcomes of presymptomatic infants transplanted for Krabbe disease: report of the workshop held on July 11 and 12, 2008, Holiday Valley, New York. Genet Med 11:450–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erbe RW, Levy HL (2012) Neonatal screening. In: Rimoin DL, Connor JM, Pyeritz RE, Korf BR (eds) Emery and Rimoin's principles and practice of medical genetics, 6th edition, in press

  • Escolar ML, Poe MD, Provenzale JM et al. (2005) Transplantation of umbilical-cord blood in babies with infantile Krabbe's disease. N Engl J Med 352:2069–2081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller M, Lovejoy M, Brooks DA, Harkin ML, Hopwood JJ, Meikle PJ (2004) Immunoquantification of alpha-galactosidase: evaluation for the diagnosis of Fabry disease. Clin Chem 50:1979–1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson KM, Bennett MJ, Naylor EW, Morton DH (1998) 3-Methylcrotonyl-coenzyme A carboxylase deficiency in Amish/Mennonite adults identified by detection of increased acylcarnitines in blood spots of their children. J Pediatr 132(3 Pt 1):519–523

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley WB (2008) Finding the fertile woman with phenylketonuria. Europ J Obstet Gynec Repro Bio 137:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann B (2009) Fabry disease: recent advances in pathology, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Orphanet J Rare Dis (OJRD) 4(21):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkin RJ, Bissler J, Banikazemi M et al. (2008) Characterization of Fabry disease in 352 pediatric patients in the Fabry registry. Pediatr Res 64(5):550–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hwu WL, Chien YH, Lee NC et al. (2009) Newborn screening for Fabry disease in Taiwan reveals a high incidence of the later-onset GLA mutation c.936+919G>A (IVS4+919G>A). Hum Mutat 30:1397–1405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper AR, Hwu W-L, Lloyd-Puryear M, Kishnani PS (2007) Newborn screening for Pompe disease: synthesis of the evidence and development of screening recommendations. Pediatr 120:e1327–e1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper AR, Knapp AA, Green NS, Comeau AM, Metterville DR, Perrin JM (2010) Weighing the evidence for newborn screening for early-infantile Krabbe disease. Genet Med 12:539–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishnani PS, Howell RR (2004) Pompe disease in infants and children. J Pediatr 144(5 Suppl):S35–S43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishnani PS, Hwu WL, Mandel H, Nicolino M, Yong F, Corzo D, for the Infantile-Onset Pompe Disease Natural History Study Group (2006) A retrospective, multinational, multicenter study on the natural history of infantile-onset Pompe disease. J Pediatr 148:671–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishnani PS, Corzo D, Nicolonio M et al. (2007) Recombinant human acid alpha-glucosidase: major clinical benefits in infantile-onset Pompe disease. Neurol 68:99–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kishnani PS, Goldenberg PC, DeArmey SL et al. (2010) Cross-reactive immunologic material status affects treatment outcomes in Pompe disease infants. Mol Genet Metab 99:26–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kokotos F (2009) The vulnerable child syndrome. Pediatr Rev 30:193–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krivit W, Shapiro EG, Peters C et al. (1998) Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in globoid-cell leukodystrophy. N Engl J Med 338:1119–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumamoto S, Katafuchi T, Nakamura K et al. (2009) High frequency of acid alpha-glucosidase pseudodeficiency complicates newborn screening for glycogen storage disease type II in the Japanese population. Mol Gen Metab 97:190–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labrousse P, Chien YH, Pomponio RJ et al. (2010) Genetic heterozygosity and pseudodeficiency in the Pompe disease newborn screening pilot program. Mol Genet Metab 99:379–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Scott CR, Chamoles NA et al. (2004) Direct multiplex assay of lysosomal enzymes in dried blood spots for newborn screening. Clin Chem 50:1785–1796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linthorst GE, Vedder AC, Aerts JM, Hollak CE (2005) Screening for Fabry disease using whole blood spots fails to identify one-third of female carriers. Clin Chim Acta 353(1–2):201–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linthorst GE, Bouwman MG, Wijburg FA, Aerts JM, Poorthuis BJ, Hollak CE (2010) Screening for Fabry disease in high-risk populations: a systematic review. J Med Genet 47:217–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meikle PJ, Grasby DJ, Dean CJ et al. (2006) Newborn screening for lysosomal storage disorders. Mol Genet Metab 88:307–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn NJ, Messinger YHH, Rosenberg AS, Kishnani PS (2009) Elimination of antibodies to recombinant enzyme in Pompe's disease. N Eng J Med 360:194–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercimek-Mahmutoglu S, Moeslinger D, Haberle J et al. (2010) Long-term outcome of patients with argininosuccinate lyase deficiency diagnosed by newborn screening in Austria. Mol Genet Metab 100:24–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merk T, Wibmer T, Schumann C, Kruger S (2009) Glycogen storage disease type II (Pompe disease)–influence of enzyme replacement therapy in adults. Europ J Neurol 16:274–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moyer VA, Calonge N, Teutsch SM, Botkin JR, on behalf of the United States Preventive Task Force (2008) Expanded newborn screening: process, policy and priorities. Hast Cent Rep 38(3):32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Screening Committee (UK) (2011) Programme appraisal criteria: Criteria for appraising the viability, effectiveness and appropriateness of a screening programme. On the web at: http://www.screening.nhs.uk/criteria. Last accessed November 25, 2011

  • Newborn Screening Task Force (2000) Serving the family from birth to the medical home: newborn screening: a blueprint for the future—a call for a National Agenda on State Newborn Screening Programs. Pediatr 106(2 Suppl):389–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Petros M (2011) Revisiting the Wilson-Jungner criteria: how can supplemental criteria guide public health in the era of genetic screening? Genet Med. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31823331d0

  • President’s Council on Bioethics (2008) The changing moral focus of newborn screening. Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbach M, Klein A, Kohli-Wiesner A et al. (2010) CRIM-negative infantile Pompe disease: 42-month treatment outcome. J Inherit Metab Dis 33:751–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross LF (2006) Screening for conditions that do not meet the Wilson and Jungner criteria: the case of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Amer J Med Genet 140A:914–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross LF (2010) Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening? Kennedy Instit Ethics J 20:299–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozenfeld PA (2009) Treatment and diagnosis. IUBMB (Internat Union Biochem Mol Bio) Life 61(11):1043–1050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saito S, Ohno K, Sakuraba H (2011) Fabry-database.org: database of the clinical phenotypes, genotypes and mutant alpha-galactosidase structures in Fabry disease. J Human Genet 56:467–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salveson R (2011) Expansion of the New York State newborn screening panel and Krabbe disease: a systematic program evaluation. PhD Dissertation for the School of Nursing at Columbia University. On the web at: http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:132317. Last accessed November 25, 2011

  • Spada M, Pagliardini S, Yasuda M et al. (2006) High incidence of later-onset Fabry disease revealed by newborn screening. Amer J Hum Genet 79:31–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strothotte S, Strigl-Pill N, Grunert B et al. (2010) Enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa in 44 patients with late-onset glycogen storage disease type 2: 12-month results of an observational clinical trial. J Neurol 257:91–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans S, Buchbinder M (2010) Patients-in-waiting: living between sickness and health. J Health Social Behav 51:408–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Calcar SC, Gleason LA, Lindh H et al. (2007) 2-Methylbutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in Hmong infants identified by expanded newborn screen. Wisconsin Med J 106(1):12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcken B (2010) Expanded newborn screening: reducing harm, assessing benefit. J Inherit Metab Dis 33(Suppl 2):S205–S210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JM, Jungner G (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease. Public health papers 34. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 1–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK) (1994) The genetic testing of children. J Med Genet 31:785–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Paul Wuh-Liang Hwu, Dr. Yin-Hsiu Chien, Dr. Marco Spada, Dr. Robert Desnick, and Dr. Richard Erbe for their helpful clarifications about the newborn screening protocols for the various lysosomal storage diseases discussed in this manuscript and for their helpful comments regarding an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Lainie Ross serves on the Illinois Department of Public Health, Genetic and Metabolic Diseases Advisory Committee, June 2009- present. The views expressed are her own and do not reflect the views of the Committee.

All of the personal communications have been reviewed with the authors who approve of the citation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lainie Friedman Ross.

Additional information

Communicated by: Rodney Pollitt

Competing interest: None declared.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, L.F. Newborn screening for lysosomal storage diseases: an ethical and policy analysis. J Inherit Metab Dis 35, 627–634 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-011-9435-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-011-9435-0

Keywords

Navigation