Abstract
Dendritic cell chemotaxis is known to follow chemoattractant concentration gradients through tissue of heterogeneous pore sizes, but the dependence of migration velocity on pore size and gradient steepness is not fully understood. We enabled chemotaxis studies for at least 42 hours at confinements relevant to tissue models by two-photon polymerization of linear channel constructs with cross-sections from 10 × 10 μm2 to 20 × 20 μm2 inside commercially available chemotaxis analysis chips. Faster directed migration was observed with decreasing channel dimensions despite substantial cell deformation in the narrower channels. Finite element modeling of a cell either partly or fully obstructing chemokine diffusion in the narrow channels revealed strong local accentuation of the chemokine concentration gradients. The modeled concentration differences across a cell correlated well with the observed velocity dependence on channel cross-section. However, added effects due to spatial confinement could not be excluded. The design freedom offered by two-photon polymerization was exploited to minimize the accentuated concentration gradients in cell-blocked channels by introducing “venting slits” to the surrounding medium at a length scale too small (≤500 nm) for the cells to explore, thereby decoupling effects of concentration gradients and spatial confinement. Studies in slitted 10 × 10 μm2 channels showed significantly reduced migration speeds indistinguishable from speeds observed in unslitted 20 × 20 μm2 channel. This result agrees with model predictions of very small concentration gradient variations in slitted channels, thus indicating a strong influence of the concentration gradient steepness, not the channel size, on the directed migration velocity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Aman, T. Piotrowski, Dev Biol 341, 20 (2010)
V. Ambravaneswaran, I.Y. Wong, A.J. Aranyosi, M. Toner, D. Irimia, Integr Biol (Camb) 2, 639 (2010)
G. Faure-Andre, P. Vargas, M. Yuseff, M. Heuze, J. Diaz, D. Lankar, V. Steri, J. Manry, S. Hugues, F. Vascotto, J. Boulanger, G. Raposo, M. Bono, M. Rosemblatt, M. Piel, A. Lennon-Dumenil, Science 322, 1705 (2008)
R.N. Germain, E.A. Robey, M.D. Cahalan, Science 336, 1676 (2012)
U. Haessler, M. Pisano, M. Wu, M.A. Swartz, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 5614 (2011)
A. Hill, J Physiol 40, 4 (1910)
D. Irimia, G. Charras, N. Agrawal, T. Mitchison, M. Toner, Lab Chip 7, 1783 (2007)
J. Jacobelli, R.S. Friedman, M.A. Conti, A. Lennon-Dumenil, M. Piel, C.M. Sorensen, R.S. Adelstein, M.F. Krummel, Nat Immunol 11, 953 (2010)
H. Jonuleit, U. Kühn, G. Müller, K. Steinbrink, L. Paragnik, E. Schmitt, J. Knop, A.H. Enk, Eur J Immunol 27, 3135 (1997)
T. Laemmermann, B.L. Bader, S.J. Monkley, T. Worbs, R. Wedlich-Soeldner, K. Hirsch, M. Keller, R. Foerster, D.R. Critchley, R. Faessler, M. Sixt, Nature 453, 51 (2008)
C.N. LaFratta, J.T. Fourkas, T. Baldacchini, R.A. Farrer, Angew Chem Int Ed 46, 6238 (2007)
N. Li, M. Schwartz, C. Ionescu-Zanetti, J Biomol Screen 14, 194 (2009)
C. Miller, Proc R Soc Lond A 106, 724 (1924)
A. Ogston, B. Preston, J. Wells, Proc R Soc Lond A 333, 297 (1973)
M.H. Olsen, G.M. Hjorto, M. Hansen, O. Met, I.M. Svane, N.B. Larsen, Lab Chip 13, 4800 (2013)
W.S. Rasband, ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. (1997–2012), http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
P.J. Sarvaiya, D. Guo, I. Ulasov, P. Gabikian, M.S. Lesniak, Oncotarget 4, 2171 (2013)
P. Thevenaz, U.E. Ruttimann, M. Unser, IEEE Trans Image Process 7, 27 (1998)
Y. Wang, D.J. Irvine, Integr Biol (Camb) 5, 481 (2013)
M. Weber, R. Hauschild, J. Schwarz, C. Moussion, I. de Vries, D.F. Legler, S.A. Luther, T. Bollenbach, M. Sixt, Science 339, 328 (2013)
B. Welch, Biometrika 34, 28 (1947)
K. Wolf, M. Te Lindert, M. Krause, S. Alexander, J. Te Riet, A.L. Willis, R.M. Hoffman, C.G. Figdor, S.J. Weiss, P. Friedl, J Cell Biol 201, 1069 (2013)
K. Wolf, S. Alexander, V. Schacht, L.M. Coussens, U.H. von Andrian, J. van Rheenen, E. Deryugina, P. Friedl, Semin Cell Dev Biol 20, 931 (2009)
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Esben Kjær Unmack Larsen for assistance with photochemical modification of chip surfaces with PEGDA. We acknowledge financial support from the Danish Council for Independent Research, Technology and Production Sciences, grant# 09-070021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Gertrud Malene Hjortø and Mark Holm Olsen contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hjortø, G.M., Olsen, M.H., Svane, I.M. et al. Confinement dependent chemotaxis in two-photon polymerized linear migration constructs with highly definable concentration gradients. Biomed Microdevices 17, 30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-015-9937-x
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-015-9937-x