Skip to main content
Log in

Horizontal persistence and the complexity hypothesis

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the complexity hypothesis in microbial evolutionary genetics from a philosophical vantage. This hypothesis, in its current version, states that genes with high connectivity (more functional connections to other genes) are likely to be resistant to being horizontally transferred. We defend four claims. (1) There is an important distinction between two different ways in which a gene family can persist: vertically and horizontally. There is a trade-off between these two modes of persistence, such that a gene better at achieving one will be worse at achieving the other. (2) At least some genes are likely to experience selection favoring increased transferability. One consequence of this can be encapsulated as the “simplicity hypothesis”: horizontally persisting genes will experience selection favoring reduced connectivity. (3) In order to make sense of the simplicity hypothesis, we need to consider evolutionary populations that transcend species boundaries. Vertical and horizontal persistence are therefore not two competing ways of succeeding at the same game, but involve playing two different games altogether. (4) The complexity hypothesis can be understood in terms of two related notions: entrenchment and Cuvierian functionalism. This framing reveals previously unrecognized and philosophically interesting connections between reasoning about deep conservation and horizontal transfer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We speak of gene family acquisition to distinguish this form of transfer from paralog addition, which also involves gene acquisition.

  2. For evidence of phylogenetically restricted transfer of highly connected genes, see (Tian et al. 2015; Wu et al. 2016).

  3. We raise this point because it constitutes a possible exception to the general existence of an inverse correlation between connectivity and transferability. An anonymous reviewer, however, suggests that this case might not be an exception: low but non-zero levels of coevolution could result in complex poisoning (the transferred protein interacts with the host complex, but dysfunctionally), and thus could render HGT deleterious. In the absence of empirical work, it is difficult to know how to balance these competing reasons.

  4. An anonymous reviewer suggested the proteorhodopsin gene family as a candidate (see Giovannoni et al. 2005; Frigaard et al. 2006; Sharma et al. 2006).

  5. Such reasoning has recently been applied to the case of ribosomal RNAs (Tsukuda et al. 2017), and there is evidence that transfer has in fact occurred in this case (Sato and Miyazaki 2017).

  6. Similar points apply in the case of transposable elements, which must jump to new locations more rapidly than they degrade (to the point of losing transposability) in the locations they already occupy (Condit et al. 1988; Condit 1990).

  7. In making this claim, we are considering only the effects of selection for transferability; other causes (as discussed in the “Vertical and Horizontal Persistence” section) might counteract these effects in real populations.

  8. We are not positing selective processes that favor increased connectivity directly; it is enough for entrenchment to be a byproduct of selective processes. In Sober’s (1984) terms, what is required is selection of increased connectivity, not selection for it.

  9. A quick note on terminology: throughout this section we will exclusively use “step” to refer to particular moves in the Cuvierian argument pattern, and “stage” to refer to temporal parts of organismal and evolutionary processes (e.g., developmental stages, stages of successful HGT).

  10. Because of these features, Cuvierian functionalism can seem to suggest that species have fixed “types”, ignoring the variability of real populations. However, Cuvierian functionalism ultimately rests on a kind of selective process (filtering out of variants that disrupt integration), and thus requires variability. An explanation of stasis in terms of the absence of variants would not be Cuvierian functionalist. See Novick (2019) for a full discussion of these issues.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Bill Wimsatt, Joe Bielawski, Fabien Denis-Cayer, Maureen O’Malley, and two anonymous referees for Biology and Philosophy for comments on the manuscript, as well as Jeremy Wideman and Chris Jones for helpful discussion. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Grant Number GLDSU/447989.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Novick.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novick, A., Doolittle, W.F. Horizontal persistence and the complexity hypothesis. Biol Philos 35, 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9727-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9727-6

Keywords

Navigation