Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extending the modern synthesis with ants: Ant encounters

D. M. Gordon: Ant encounters: interaction networks and colony behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson KE, Linksvayer TA, Smith CR (2008) The causes and consequences of genetic caste determination in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 11:119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1984) The evolution of eusociality. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:165–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleakley BH, Wolf JB, Moore AJ (2011) The quantitative genetics of social behaviour. In: Székely T, Moore AJ, Komdeur J (eds) Social behaviour. Genes, ecology and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ (2007) Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr Biol 17(16):673–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ (2009) Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 364(1533):3191–3207. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (2011) Principles of social evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady SG, Schultz TR, Fisher BL, Ward PS (2006) Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(48):18172–18177. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605858103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 18(1):41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke E (2011) Plant individuality and multilevel selection theory. In: Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) Major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ (2009) The ecological setting of social evolution: the demography of ant populations. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvad University Press, Cambridge, pp 74–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwallis CK, West SA, Davis KE, Griffin AS (2010) Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature 466(7309):969–991. doi:10.1038/nature09335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debout G, Schatz B, Elias M, McKey D (2007) Polydomy in ants: what we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done. Biol J Linn Soc 90(2):319–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Macdonald KS (2010) Kin structure, ecology and the evolution of social organization in shrimp: a comparative analysis. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 277(1681):575–584. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Morrison CL, Rios R (2000) Multiple origins of eusociality among sponge-dwelling shrimps (Synalpheus). Evolution 54(2):503–516

    Google Scholar 

  • El Mouden C, West SA, Gardner A (2010) The enforcement of cooperation by policing. Evolution 64(7):2139–2152. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00963.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewell J (2003) Social insect networks. Science 26:1867–1870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH, Schmidt SK, Taylor T (2009) Division of labor in the context of complexity. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 483–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjerdingstad EJ, Crozier RH (2006) The evolution of worker caste diversity in social insects. Am Nat 167(3):390–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank SA (2003) Perspective: repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution 57(4):693–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Marshall JAR, Dechaume Moncharmont F-C (2009) The dawn of a golden age in mathematical insect sociobiology. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 437–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadagkar R (1997) The evolution of caste polymorphism in social insects: Genetic release followed by diversifying evolution. J Genet 76(3):167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, Grafen A (2009) Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J Evol Biol 22(4):659–671. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01681.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (2010) Ant encounters: interaction networks and colony behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (2007) The formal Darwinism project: a mid-term report. J Evol Biol 20(4):1243–1254. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01321.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond RL, Bruford MW, Bourke AFG (2003) Male parentage does not vary with colony kin structure in a multiple-queen ant. J Evol Biol 16(3):446–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze J (2008) The demise of the standard ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 11:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Helanterä H, Bargum K (2007) Pedigree relatedness, not green beard genes, explains eusociality. Oikos 116(2):217–220. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15411.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helanterä H, Strassmann JE, Carrillo J, Queller DC (2009) Unicolonial ants: where do they come from, what are they and where are they going? Trends Ecol Evol 24(6):341–349. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320(5880):1213–1216. doi:10.1126/science.1156108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt JH, Kensinger BJ, Kossuth JA, Henshaw MT, Norberg K, Wolschin F, Amdam GV (2007) A diapause pathway underlies the gyne phenotype in polistes wasps, revealing an evolutionary route to caste-containing insect societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(35):14020–14025. doi:10.1073/pnas.0705660104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt BG, Wyder S, Elango N, Werren JH, Zdobnov EM, Yi SV, Goodisman MAD (2010a) Sociality is linked to rates of protein evolution in a highly social insect. Mol Biol Evol 27(3):497–500. doi:10.1093/molbev/msp225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt JH, Wolschin F, Henshaw MT, Newman TC, Toth AL, Amdam GV (2010b) Differential gene expression and protein abundance evince ontogenetic bias toward castes in a primitively eusocial wasp. Plos One 5(5):e10674. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski D (2010) Origination patterns and multilevel processes in macroevolution. In: Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (eds) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Deneubourg J-L (2009) Positive feedback, convergent collective patterns, and social transitions in arthropods. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 460–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR, Linksvayer TA (2010) Deconstructing the superorganism: social physiology, groundplans, and sociogenomics. Q Rev Biol 85(1):57–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler MD, Gadau J (2009) Social insects, evo-devo, and the novelty problem: the advantage of natural experiments sensu boveri. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 590–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Linksvayer TA (2006) Direct, maternal, and sibsocial genetic effects on individual and colony traits in an ant. Evolution 60(12):2552–2561

    Google Scholar 

  • Linksvayer TA (2007) Ant species differences determined by epistasis between brood and worker genomes. Plos One 2(10):e994. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linksvayer TA (2008) Queen-worker-brood coadaptation rather than conflict may drive colony resource allocation in the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62(5):647–657. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0489-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linksvayer TA, Wade MJ (2005) The evolutionary origin and elaboration of sociality in the aculeate hymenoptera: maternal effects, sibsocial effects, and heterochrony. Q Rev Biol 80(3):317–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linksvayer TA, Wade MJ (2009) Genes with social effects are expected to harbor more sequence variation within and between species. Evolution 63(7):1685–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linksvayer TA, Fondrk MK, Page RE (2009) Honeybee social regulatory networks are shaped by colony-level selection. Am Nat 173(3):E99–E107. doi:10.1086/596527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlothlin JW, Moore AJ, Wolf JB, Brodie ED (2010) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Social evolution. Evolution 64(9):2558–2574. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01012.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau CS, Bell CD, Vila R, Archibald SB, Pierce NE (2006) Phylogeny of the ants: diversification in the age of angiosperms. Science 312(5770):101–104. doi:10.1126/science.1124891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB (2010) Epigenetic innovation. In: Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (eds) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 307–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunney L (1999) Lineage selection: natural selection for long-term benefit. In: Keller L (ed) Levels of selection in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 529

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Page JRE, Linksvayer TA, Amdam GV (2009) Social life from solitary regulatory networks: a paradigm for insect sociality. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 357–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters C (1997) Morphologically ‘primitive’ ants: comparative review of social characters, and the importance of queen-worker dimorphism. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) Social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 372–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper JW, Herron MD (2008) Does biology need an organism concept? Biol Rev 83(4):621–627. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00057.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2007) Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution 61(12):2743–2749. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (2006) Making sense of evolution. The conceptual foundations of evolutionary biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

  • Pigliucci M, Müller GB (2010a) Elements of an extended evolutionary synthesis. In: Pigliucci M, Müller GB (eds) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M, Müller GB (eds) (2010b) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt SC (2009) Insect societies as models for collective decision making. In: Gadau J, Fewell JH (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 503–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Strassmann JE (2009) Beyond society: the evolution of organismality. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 364(1533):3143–3155. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Helanterä H (2009) The evolution of extreme altruism and inequality in insect societies. Philos Trans R Soc B-Biol Sci 364(1533):3169–3179. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Wenseleers T (2005) Policing insect societies. Science 307(5706):54–56. doi:10.1126/science.1106934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Wenseleers T (2008) Altruism in insect societies and beyond: voluntary or enforced? Trends Ecol Evol 23(1):45–52. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T (2006) Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 51:581–608. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Suni SS, Gignoux C, Gordon DM (2007) Male parentage in dependent-lineage populations of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus. Mol Ecol 16(24):5149–5155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zweden JS, Brask JB, Christensen JH, Boomsma JJ, Linksvayer TA, D’Ettorre P (2010) Blending of heritable recognition cues among ant nestmates creates distinct colony gestalt odours but prevents within-colony nepotism. J Evol Biol 23(7):1498–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GP, Draghi J (2010) Evolution of evolvability. In: Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (eds) Evolution: the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 379–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW (2006) Comparative analysis of worker reproduction and policing in eusocial hymenoptera supports relatedness theory. Am Nat 168(6):E163–E179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Helanterä H, Hart A, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Worker reproduction and policing in insect societies: an ESS analysis. J Evol Biol 17(5):1035–1047. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00751.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (2005) The rise of the ants: a phylogenetic and ecological explanation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(21):7411–7414. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502264102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JB, Brodie ED III, Cheverud JM, Moore AJ, Wade MJ (1998) Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol Evol 13(2):64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Kim Sterelny, Dave Queller and Joan Strassmann for comments on the manuscript, Tobias Uller for discussions and comments, and the Academy of Finland (grant number 135970) for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, POB 65, 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland

    Heikki Helanterä

Authors
  1. Heikki Helanterä
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heikki Helanterä.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helanterä, H. Extending the modern synthesis with ants: Ant encounters. Biol Philos 26, 935–944 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9267-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9267-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation