Abstract
The aim of this work was to estimate genetic variability for in vitro culture response of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of the genus Lycopersicon. The callus percentage (C), the regeneration percentage (R) and the productivity rate (PR) were evaluated 45 d after culture initiation in a set of 16 elite tomato RILs and their parents. The narrow sense heritability (h 2) values were 0.38 ± 0.04 for C, 0.46 ± 0.04 for R, and 0.28 ± 0.03 for R, while the genetic correlation (r g ) values were −0.96 ± 0.07 between C and R, 0.81 ± 0.14 between PR and R, and −0.79 ± 0.16 between PR and C. Three AFLP markers associated to the in vitro traits were identified.
Abbreviations
- C:
-
callus percentage
- h 2 :
-
narrow sense heritability
- PR:
-
productivity rate
- R:
-
regeneration percentage
- rg :
-
genetic correlation
- RILs:
-
recombinant inbred lines
References
Bhatia, P., Ashwath, N.: Comparative performance of micropropagated and seed-grown tomato plants.-Biol. Plant. 48: 625–628, 2004.
Blears, M.J., De Grandis, S.A., Lee, H., Trevors, J.T.: Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP): a review of the procedure and its applications.-J. ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21: 99–114, 1998.
Flores Berrios, E., Gentzbittel, L., Kayyal, H., Alibert, G., Sarrafi, A.: AFLP mapping of QTLs for in vitro organogenesis traits using recombinant inbred lines in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).-Theor. appl. Genet. 101: 1299–1306, 2000.
Frankerberger, E.A., Hasegawa, P.M., Tigchelaar, E.C.: Diallel analysis of shoot-forming capacity among selected tomato genotypes.-Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 102: 233–242, 1981.
Halamkova, E., Vagera, J., Ohnoutkova, L.: Regeneration capacity of calli derived from immature embryos in spring barley cultivars.-Biol. Plant. 48: 313–316, 2004.
Kearsey, M.J., Pooni, H.S.: The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. First Edition.-Chapman & Hall, London 1996.
Koornneef, M., Bade, J., Hanhart, C., Horsman, K., Schel, J., Soppe, W., Verkek, R., Zabel, P.: Characterization and mapping of a gene controlling shoot regeneration in tomato.-Plant J. 3: 131–141, 1993.
Kuroda, S., Kato, H., Ikeda, R.: Heterosis and combining ability for callus growth rate in rice.-Crop Sci. 38: 933–936, 1998.
Nestares, G., Zorzoli, R., Mroginski, L.A., Picardi, L.A.: Cytoplasm effects on the regeneration ability of sunflower.-Plant Breed. 117: 188–190, 1998.
Ogburia, M.N.: Somatic embryogenesis, plantlet regeneration and micropropagation of cultivars and F1 hybrids of Manihot esculenta.-Biol. Plant. 47: 429–432, 2003/4.
Pratta, G., Canepa, L.N., Zorzoli, R., Picardi, L.A.: Diallel analysis of in vitro culture traits in the genus Lycopersicon.-HortScience 38: 110–112, 2003.
Pratta, G., Zorzoli, R., Picardi, L.A.: Intra and interspecific variability of in vitro culture response in Lycopersicon (tomatoes).-Braz. J. Genet. 20: 75–78, 1997.
Pratta, G., Zorzoli, R., Picardi, L.A., Valle, E.M.: Tomato recombinant inbred lines characterized by AFLP markers-Basic appl. Genet. 15: 134, 2002.
Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples).-Biometrika 52: 591–611, 1965.
Takashina, T., Suzuki, T., Egashira, H., Imanishi, S.: New molecular markers linked with the high shoot regeneration capacity of the wild tomato species Lycopersicon chilense.-Breed. Sci. 48: 109–113, 1998.
Tal, M., Dehan, K., Heikin, H.: Morphogenetic potential of cultural leaf sections of cultivated and wild species of tomato.-Ann. Bot. 41: 937–941, 1977.
Tanksley, S.D.: Mapping polygenes.-Annu. Rev. Genet. 27: 205–233, 1993.
Torelli, A., Soragni, E., Bolchi, A., Petrucco, S., Ottonello, S., Branca, C.: New potential markers of in vitro tomato morphogenesis identified by mRNA differential display.-Plant mol. Biol. 32: 891–900, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pratta, G.R., Zorzoli, R., Picardi, L.A. et al. Variability for the in vitro culture response in tomato recombinant inbred lines. Biol Plant 50, 421–424 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-006-0060-y
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-006-0060-y