Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of wind erosion on the spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in two desert grassland communities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wind is known to affect the spatial heterogeneity of soil resources in arid and semiarid systems, but multi-year, quantified observations are largely absent. We studied the effects of wind erosion on the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) and other soil nutrients at the Jornada Experimental Range, in southern New Mexico. Enhanced wind erosion was encouraged by grass cover reduction in a Sporobolus-mesquite dominated site (SM) and a Bouteloua-mesquite dominated site (BM). The scale and magnitude of spatial dependence for the soil analytes were quantified using geostatistical analyses. Results of this study show that soil organic matter related analytes such as SOC, TN, Navail, and SO4 are among the first to be eroded and redistributed; cations such as Ca2+ and Mg2+ may not be removed and redistributed significantly; and other ions such as K+, Na+ and Cl showed no discernible pattern of change. Geostatistics show that wind appeared to increase the scale of spatial autocorrelation, but decrease the scale of spatial dependence of most soil analytes over 2–3 windy seasons. In the wind enhanced plot of the SM site, up to 99% of the spatial dependence of SOC was autocorrelated at the distance of 1.45 m before the initiation of wind erosion, but the spatial dependence dropped significantly to only 60% at a larger autocorrelation distance of 2.76 m after three windy seasons. Similar but less significant changes were observed for SOC in the BM site. Despite the differential effects of wind on the soil analytes, we conclude that the overall results of wind on the grass cover reduction plots are the disappearance of small, strong fertile islands, which may be related to grasses; and the reinforcement of large fertile islands, which are likely related to mesquite shrubs. In addition, the change of the spatial patterns of SOC and other soil nutrients induced by enhanced wind erosion may persist and reinforce soil islands associated with shrubs, thus allowing a positive feedback for further desertification in this arid grassland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augustine DJ, Frank DA (2001) Effects of migratory grazers on spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen properties in a grassland ecosystem. Ecology 82:3149–3162

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldock JA, Nelson PN (2000) Soil organic matter. In: Sumner ME (ed) Handbook of soil science. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp B25–B84

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffington LC, Herbel CH (1965) Vegetation changes on a semidesert grassland range from 1858–1964. Ecol Monogr 35:139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulloch HE Jr, Neher RE (1977) Soil survey of Dona County area, New Mexico. Soil Conserv. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agric., Washington, DC

  • Burke IC (1989) Control of nitrogen mineralization in a sagebrush steppe landscape. Ecology 70:1115–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain ML, Subler S, Evans JP, Fortin MJ (1999) Sampling spatial and temporal variation in soil nitrogen availability. Oecologia 118:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger KD, Reiners WA, Burke IC, Olson RK (1991) Net erosion on a sagebrush steppe landscape as determined by cesium-137 distribution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:254–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford CS, Gosz JR (1982) Desert ecosystems: their resources in space and time. Environ Conserv 9:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross AC, Schlesinger WH (2001) Biological and geochemical controls on phosphorus fractions in semiarid soils. Biogeochemistry 52:155–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk MC, Schmidt SK, Seastedt TR (1998) Topographic patterns of above- and belowground production and nitrogen cycling in alpine tundra. Ecology 79:2253–2266

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers AJ, Stuedemann JA, Schomberg HH (2000) Spatial pattern of soil carbon and nitrogen pools under grazed tall fescue. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:635–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryrear DW (1986) A field dust sampler. J Soil Water Conserv 41:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillette DA, Pitchford AM (2004) Sand flux in the northern Chichuhuan desert, New Mexico, USA, and the influence of mesquite-dominated landscapes. J Geophys Res 109:F04003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillette DA, Fryrear DW, Gill TE, Ley T, Cahill TA, Gearhart EA (1997) Relation of vertical flux of particles smaller than 10 μm to aeolian horizontal mass flux at Owens Lake. J Geophys Res 102:26,009–26,015

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillman GP, Bruce RC, Davey BG, Kimble JM, Searle PL, Skjemstad JO (1983) A comparison of methods used for determination of cation exchange capacity. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 14:1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Gostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley AE, Barger N, Belnap J et al (2007) Dryland ecosystems. In: Marschner P, Rengel Z (eds) Nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Springer

  • Helm P, Breed CS (1999) Monitoring surface changes in desert areas. In: Breed CS, Reheis MC (eds) Desert winds: monitoring wind-related surface processes in Arizona, Mexico and California. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1598. G.P.O., Washington, USA, pp 30–51

  • Hendershot WH, Duquette M (1986) A simple barium chloride method for determining cation exchange and exchangeable cations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:605–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman RP, Provencio KR, Herrera-Matos J, Toreez RJ (1995) Resource islands predict the distribution of heterotrophic bacteria in Chihuahuan Desert soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1816–1821

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook PB, Burke IC, Lanenroth WR (1991) Heterogeneity in soil N and C associated with individual plants and openings in North American shortgrass steppe. Plant Soil 138(2):247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn OP, Alley MM, Bertsh PM (1982) Cation exchange capacity measurements. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 13:851–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman JA, Snepvangers JJJC, Bouten W, Heuvelink GBM (2003) Monitoring temporal development of spatial soil water content variation: comparison of ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone 2:519–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1993) Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J Ecol 81:683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieft TL, White CS, Loftin SR, Aguilar R, Craig JA, Skaar DA (1998) Temporal dynamics in soil carbon and nitrogen resources at a grassland-shrubland ecotone. Ecology 79(2):671–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajtha K, Schlesinger WH (1988) The biogeochemistry of phosphorus cycling and phosphorus availability along a desert soil chronosequence. Ecology 69(1):24–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larney FJ, Bullock MS, Janzen HH, Ellert BH, Olson ES (1998) Wind erosion effects on nutrient redistribution and soil productivity. J Soil Water Conserv 53(2):133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys J, McTainsh G (1994) Soil loss and nutrient decline by wind erosion-cause for concern. Aust J Soil Water Conserv 7(3):30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Okin GS, Alvarez L, Epstein H (2007) Quantitative effects of vegetation cover on wind erosion and soil nutrient loss in a desert grassland of southern New Mexico, USA. Biogeochemistry 85:317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF, Whitson PD (1975) Size-biomass relationships of several Chihuahuan Desert shrubs. Am Midl Nat 94:451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash MS, Jackson E, Whitford WG (2004) Effects of intense, short-duration grazing on microtopography in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. J Arid Environ 56:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okin GS, Gillette DA (2001) Distribution of vegetation in wind-dominated landscapes: implications for wind erosion modeling and landscape processes. J Geophys Res 106:9673–9683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo-Iguzquiza E, Dowd P (2001) Variance-covariance matrix of the experimental variogram: assessing variogram uncertainty. Math Geol 33(4):397–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons AJ, Abrahams AD, Simanton JR (1992) Microtopography and soil-surface materials on seim-arid piedmont hillslopes, southern Arizona. J Arid Environ 22:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 944 pp

  • Reynolds JF, Virginia RA, Kemp RR, de Soyza AG, Tremmel DC (1999) Impact of drought on desert shrubs: effects of seasonality and degree of resource island development. Ecol Monogr 68:69–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schade JD, Hobbie S (2005) Spatial and temporal variation in islands of fertility in the Sonoran Desert. Biogeochemistry 73:541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Pilmanis AM (1998) Plant-soil interactions in deserts. Biogeochemistry 42:169–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Reynolds J, Cunningham G, Huenneke L, Jarrell W, Virginia R, Whitford W (1990) Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247:1043–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Raikes AF, Hartley AE, Cross AF (1996) On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Ward TJ, Anderson J (2000) Nutrient losses in runoff from grassland and shrubland habitats in southern New Mexico: II. Field plots. Biogeochemistry 49:69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes RJ, Walker BH (2004) An African savanna-synthesis of nylsvley study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer JM, Varljen MD (1990) Approximation of confidence-limits on sample semivariograms from single realizations of spatially correlated random-fields. Water Resour Res 26(8):1787–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelzenmüller V, Ehrich S, Zauke GP (2006) Analysis of meso scaled spatial distribution of dab Limanda limanda in the German Bight: does the type of fishing gear matter? Fish Sci 72:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongway DJ, Hindley N (2000) Assessing and monitoring desertification with soil indicators. In: Arnalds O, Archer S (eds) Rangeland desertification. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Troeh FR, Thompson LM (2005) Soil and soil fertility. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Virginia RA, Jarrell WM (1983) Soil properties in a mesquite-dominated Sonoran Desert ecosystem. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:138–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Mou PP, Huang J, Wang J (2007) Spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen in a subtropical forest in China. Plant Soil 296:137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Oliver MA (2000) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • West NE, Skujins J (1977) The nitrogen cycle in North American cold-winter semi-desert ecosystems. Oecol Plant 12:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford W (2002) Ecology of desert systems. Academic Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant DEB-0316320) and Jornada Basin LTER project (Grant DEB-0080412). We thank Jacquie Hui, Mike Abrams, Emilee Carpenter, Melissa Castiano, and Tom Zhao for their assistance in experimental set up, sample collection, and laboratory analysis. Special appreciation is given to the headquarters of the USDA-ARS JER staff Kris Havstad, Eddie Garcia, Rob Dunlap, David Thatcher and John Anderson, who provided invaluable assistance with field work during this study. Associate editor Dr. Holm Tiessen and two anonymous reviewers made valuable comments that significantly improved the strength and clarity of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junran Li.

Appendix

Appendix

Summary of the semivariogram model parameters for wind erosion enhanced (T100) and control plots in 2004 and 2005. All parameters were described in the Table 4 legend

Analyte

A0 (m)

C/(C0 + C)

MSR

T100

Control

T100

Control

T100

Control

(a) Sporobolus-mesquite site

July 2004

    SOC

1.89 (0.35)*

1.01 (0.78)

0.78 (0.07)

0.52 (0.18)

0.04

−0.09

    TN

1.54 (0.24)

1.63 (0.39)

0.78 (0.11)

0.51 (0.54)

0.09

−0.06

    Navail

2.22 (0.35)*

0.65 (0.27)

0.69 (0.10)

0.75 (0.20)

0.04

−0.15

    PO4 3−

>3.0*

1.65 (0.59)

0.83 (0.12)

0.56 (0.15)

0.03

−0.03

    K+

<0.2

1.57 (0.43)

0.62 (0.18)

0.11

0.03

    Mg2+

0.65 (0.18)*

1.41 (0.26)

0.95 (0.21)*

0.58 (0.10)

0.15

0.04

    Ca2+

0.70 (0.22)

<0.2

0.99 (0.20)

0.16

0.03

    SO4 2−

2.44 (0.37)

1.83 (0.28)

0.81 (0.16)

0.93 (0.16)

−0.11

−0.11

    Cl

1.88 (0.31)*

>3.0 (0.39)

0.90 (0.14)

0.89 (0.08)

0.07

0.12

    Na+

<0.2

<0.2

July 2005

    SOC

>5.0*

0.46 (0.17)

1.00 (0.09)

0.74 (0.29)

0.09

0.13

    TN

3.65 (0.51)*

0.49 (0.17)

0.71 (0.13)

0.99 (0.24)

0.04

0.14

    Navail

2.25 (0.29)

<0.2

0.99 (0.09)

0.0

    PO4 3−

1.45 (0.24)

1.81 (0.25)

0.91 (0.14)

0.82 (0.11)

0.06

0.02

    K+

1.34 (0.23)

<0.2

0.99 (0.13)

0.07

    Mg2+

1.26 (0.23)

1.27 (0.36)

0.99 (0.15)

0.67 (0.24)

0.15

0.0

    Ca2+

1.35 (0.22)

1.51 (0.23)

0.99 (0.12)

0.99 (0.08)

0.04

0.1

    SO4 2−

0.78 (0.25)

<0.2

0.99 (0.23)

0.05

    Cl­

1.31 (0.30)

<0.2

0.99 (0.18)

0.07

    Na+

1.20 (0.27)

<0.2

0.94 (0.16)

0.10

(b) Bouteloua-mesquite site

July 05

    SOC

3.68 (0.38)*

0.57 (0.18)

0.74 (0.10)

0.99 (0.20)

0.04

0.04

    TN

1.04 (0.31)

0.77 (0.28)

0.73 (0.20)

0.88 (0.32)

0.04

0.03

    Navail

1.63 (0.27)

1.28 (0.23)

0.87 (0.14)

0.85 (0.34)

−0.09

0.07

    PO4 3−

1.93 (0.23)*

1.17 (0.22)

0.99 (0.11)

0.86 (0.33)

0.08

0.08

    K+

0.90 (0.19)

0.99 (0.18)

0.1

    Mg2+

0.70 (0.32)

0.43 (0.18)

0.60 (0.22)

0.95 (0.29)

0.07

0.03

    Ca2+

0.97 (0.21)

1.07 (0.28)

0.99 (0.16)

0.78 (0.42)

0.01

0.13

    SO4 2−

0.64 (0.44)

0.95 (0.37)

−0.05

0.16

    Cl

0.76 (0.23)

0.75 (0.12)

0.99 (0.17)

0.99 (0.16)

−0.06

0.05

    Na+

2.59 (0.32)

0.63 (0.28)

0.73 (0.14)

0.78 (0.46)

0.12

0.10

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Okin, G.S., Alvarez, L. et al. Effects of wind erosion on the spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in two desert grassland communities. Biogeochemistry 88, 73–88 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9195-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9195-6

Keywords

Navigation