Abstract
A continuous-flow column study was conducted to evaluate the long-term effects of in situ biostimulation on the biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil from a manufactured gas plant site. Simulated groundwater amended with oxygen and inorganic nutrients was introduced into one column, while a second column receiving unamended groundwater served as a control. PAH and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations, as well as microbial community profiles, were monitored along the column length immediately before and at selected intervals up to 534 days after biostimulation commenced. Biostimulation resulted in significantly greater PAH removal than in the control condition (73% of total measured PAHs vs. 34%, respectively), with dissolution accounting for a minor amount of the total mass loss (~6%) in both columns. Dissolution was most significant for naphthalene, acenaphthene, and fluorene, accounting for >20% of the total mass removed for each. A known group of PAH-degrading bacteria, ‘Pyrene Group 2’ (PG2), was identified as a dominant member of the microbial community and responded favorably to biostimulation. Spatial and temporal variations in soil PAH concentration and PG2 abundance were strongly correlated to DO advancement, although there appeared to be transport of PG2 organisms ahead of the oxygen front. At an estimated oxygen demand of 6.2 mg O2/g dry soil and a porewater velocity of 0.8 m/day, it took between 374 and 466 days for oxygen breakthrough from the 1-m soil bed in the biostimulated column. This study demonstrated that the presence of oxygen was the limiting factor in PAH removal, as opposed to the abundance and/or activity of PAH-degrading bacteria once oxygen reached a previously anoxic zone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams JA, Reddy KR (2003) Extent of benzene biodegradation in saturated soil column during air sparging. Ground Water Monit Rem 23:85–94
Alexander M (2000) Aging, bioavailability, and overestimation of risk from environmental pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 34:4259–4265
Bamforth SM, Singleton I (2005) Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: current knowledge and future directions. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 80:723–736
Bodour AA, Wang JM, Brusseau ML, Maier RM (2003) Temporal change in culturable phenanthrene degraders in response to long-term exposure to phenanthrene in a soil column system. Environ Microbiol 5:888–895
Borchert S, Mueller J, Alesi E, Leins C, Haninger V (1995) In situ bioremediation application strategies for soil and groundwater impacted by PAHs. Land Contam Reclam 3:6-1–6-4
Bouchez M, Blanchet D, Vandecasteele J (1995) Substrate availability in phenanthrene biodegradation: transfer mechanism and influence on metabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:952–960
Breedveld GD, Karlsen DA (2000) Estimating the availability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for bioremediation of creosote contaminated soils. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54:255–261
Breedveld GD, Sparrevik M (2000) Nutrient-limited biodegradation of PAH in various soil strata at a creosote contaminated site. Biodegradation 11:391–399
Chi FH, Amy GL (2004) Transport of anthracene and benz(a)anthracene through iron-quartz and three aquifer materials in laboratory columns. Chemosphere 55:515–524
Enell A, Reichenberg F, Warfvinge P, Ewald G (2004) A column method for determination of leaching of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aged contaminated soil. Chemosphere 54:707–715
Eriksson M, Dalhammar G, Borg-Karlson AK (2000) Biological degradation of selected hydrocarbons in an old PAH/creosote contaminated soil from a gas work site. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:619–626
Groves MR (1976) Preliminary Report on Groundwater Resources in Rowan County, North Carolina, pp 46–52
Gustavson KE, Harkin JM (2000) Comparison of sampling techniques and evaluation of semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) for monitoring polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in groundwater. Environ Sci Technol 34:4445–4451
Jones MD, Crandell DW, Singleton DR, Aitken MD (2011) Stable-isotope probing of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterial guild in a contaminated soil. Environ Microbiol 13:2623–2632
Khalil MF, Ghosh U, Kreitinger JP (2006) Role of weathered coal tar pitch in the partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in manufactured gas plant site sediments. Environ Sci Technol 40:5681–5687
Kim H, Lindsay K, Pfaender F (2008) Enhanced mobilization of field contaminated soil-bound PAHs to the aqueous phase under anaerobic conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 189:135–147
Lahlou M, Harms H, Springael D, Ortega-Calvo JJ (2000) Influence of soil components on the transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria through saturated porous media. Environ Sci Technol 34:3649–3656
Li J, Pignatello JJ, Smets BF, Grasso D, Monserrate E (2005) Bench-scale evaluation of in situ bioremediation strategies for soil at a former manufactured gas plant site. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:741–749
Liebeg EW, Cutright TJ (1999) The investigation of enhanced bioremediation through the addition of macro and micro nutrients in a PAH contaminated soil. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 44:55–64
Lundstedt S, Haglund P, Oberg L (2003) Degradation and formation of polycyclic aromatic compounds during bioslurry treatment of an aged gasworks soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1413–1420
Luthy RG, Aiken GR, Brusseau ML, Cunningham SD, Gschwend PM, Pignatello JJ, Reinhard M, Traina SJ, Weber WJ, Westall JC (1997) Sequestration of hydrophobic organic contaminants by geosorbents. Environ Sci Technol 31:3341–3347
Madsen EL, Mann CL, Bilotta SE (1996) Oxygen limitations and aging as explanations for the field persistence of naphthalene in coal tar-contaminated surface sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:1876–1882
Millette D, Butler BJ, Frind EO, Comeau Y, Samon R (1998) Substrate interaction during aerobic biodegradation of creosote-related compounds in columns of sandy aquifer material. J Contam Hydrol 29:165–183
Mohan SV, Kisa T, Ohkuma T, Kanaly RA, Shimizu Y (2006) Bioremediation technologies for treatment of PAH-contaminated soil and strategies to enhance process efficiency. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 5:347–374
Murarka I, Neuhauser E, Sherman M, Taylor BB, Mauro DM, Ripp J, Taylor T (1992) Organic substances in the subsurface: delineation, migration, and remediation. J Hazard Mater 32:245–261
Reemtsma T, Mehrtens J (1997) Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) leaching from contaminated soil by a column test with on-line solid phase extraction. Chemosphere 35:2491–2501
Richardson SD, Aitken MD (2011) Desorption and bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil subjected to long-term in situ biostimulation. Environ Toxicol Chem 30(12):2674–2681
Richardson SD, Lebron BL, Miller CT, Aitken MD (2011) Recovery of phenanthrene-degrading bacteria after simulated in situ persulfate oxidation in contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 45:719–725
Ringelberg DB, Talley JW, Perkins EJ, Tucker SG, Luthy RG, Bouwer EJ, Fredrickson HL (2001) Succession of phenotypic, genotypic, and metabolic community characteristics during in vitro bioslurry treatment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1542–1550
Singleton DR, Powell SN, Sangaiah R, Gold A, Ball LM, Aitken MD (2005) Stable-isotope probing of bacteria capable of degrading salicylate, naphthalene, or phenanthrene in a bioreactor treating contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1202–1209
Singleton DR, Hunt M, Powell SN, Frontera-Suau R, Aitken MD (2007) Stable-isotope probing with multiple growth substrates to determine substrate specificity of uncultivated bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 69:180–187
Talley JW, Ghosh U, Tucker SG, Furey JS, Luthy RG (2002) Particle-scale understanding of the bioavailability of PAHs in sediment. Environ Sci Technol 36:477–483
Talley JW, Zhang X, Waisner S, Ringelberg D, Hansen L (2004) Study of the potential for bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons within smear zone soils. J Environ Eng 130:1401–1407
Tiehm A, Stieber M, Werner P, Frimmel FH (1997) Surfactant-enhanced mobilization and biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in manufactured gas plant soil. Environ Sci Technol 31:2570–2576
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1996) Method 3535: solid phase extraction in Test methods for evaluating solid waste physical/chemical methods, SW-846 annual
Viñas M, Sabate J, Espuny MJ, Solanas AM (2005) Bacterial community dynamics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation during bioremediation of heavily creosote-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7008–7018
Volkering F, Breure AM, Sterkenburg A, Andel JG (1992) Microbial degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: effect of substrate availability on bacterial growth kinetics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 36:548–552
Wehrer M, Totsche KU (2005) Determination of effective release rates of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dissolved organic carbon by column outflow experiments. Eur J Soil Sci 56:803–813
Zamfirescu D, Grathwohl P (2001) Occurrence and attenuation of specific organic compounds in the groundwater plume at a former gasworks site. J Contam Hydrol 53:407–427
Zhang Y, Zhu S, Xiao R, Wang J, Li F (2008) Vertical transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different particle-size fractions of sandy soils. Environ Geol 53:1165–1172
Acknowledgments
We thank Randall Goodman and Glenn Walters for their help in the design and construction of the columns. We also thank Dr. Wei Sun and Joe Rigdon of the UNC Department of Biostatistics for assistance with statistical analyses. This work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Grant No. 5 P42 ES005948).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richardson, S.D., Jones, M.D., Singleton, D.R. et al. Long-term simulation of in situ biostimulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Biodegradation 23, 621–633 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-012-9538-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-012-9538-9