Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bacterial removal of chromium (VI) and (III) in a continuous system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodegradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The capacity of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans to reduce different concentrations of hexavalent chromium in shake flask cultures has been investigated. A. ferrooxidans reduces 100% of chromium (VI) at concentrations of 1, 2.5 and 5 ppm, but in the presence of 10 ppm only 42.9% of chromium (VI) was reduced after 11 days of incubation. A. thiooxidans showed a lower capacity to reduce this ion and total reduction of chromium (VI) was only obtained for concentrations of 1 and 2.5 ppm, whereas 64.7% and 30.5% was reached for 5 and 10 ppm, respectively, after 11 days. A continuous flow mode system was subsequently investigated, in which A. thiooxidans was immobilized on elemental sulphur and the acidic medium obtained was employed to solubilize chromium (III) and to reduce chromium (VI) present in a real electroplating waste [30% of chromium (III) and 0.1% of chromium (VI)]. The system enabled the reduction of 92.7% of hexavalent chromium and represents a promising way to treat this type of waste in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allegretti P, Furlong J, Donati E (2006) The role of higher polythionates in the reduction of chromium (VI) by Acidithiobacillus and Thiobacillus cultures. J Biotechnol 122:55–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Council of the European Communities). Council Directive of 12 June 1986 on limit values and quality objectives for discharges of certain dangerous substances (86/280/EEC). Off J Eur Commum L181:16–27

  • Chang AC, Warneke JW, Page AL, Lund LJ (1984) Accumulation of heavy metals in sewage sludge treated soils. J Environ Qual 13:87–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Lin J (2004) Bioleaching of heavy metals from livestock sludge by indigenous sulphur-oxidizing bacteria: effects of sludge solids concentration. Chemosphere 54:283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Lin J (2001) Bioleaching of heavy metals from sediment: significance of pH. Chemosphere 44:1093–1102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AE (1998) Plasma emission spectroscopy. standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA, AWWA, WEF, 20th edn. Washington DC

  • Davis RD (1987) Use of sewage sludge on land in the United Kingdom. Wat Sci Techn 19:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy RH, Latterel JJ, Hinestly TD, Grossman RB, Sullivan DL (1991) Trace metal movement in an aeric ochraqualf following 14 years of annual sludge application. J Environ Qual 20:119–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner HG (1978) Metal recovery and environmental protection by bacterial leaching of inorganic waste materials. In: Murr LE, Torma AE, Brierley JA, (eds) Metallurgical applications of bacterial leaching and related microbiological phenomena. Academic Press. pp 195–206

  • Erdem M (2006) Chromium recovery from chrome shaving generated in a tanning process. J Hazard Mater 129: 143–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gadd GM (2000) Bioremedial potential of microbial mechanisms of metal mobilization and immobilization. Current Opinion Biotechnol. 11:271–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli A, Tripathi AK (1999) Survival and chromate reducing ability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in industrial effluents. Lett Appl Microbiol 28:76–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z, Zhang G, Fang J, Dou X (2006) Enhanced chromium recovery from tanning wastewaters. J Clean Prod 14:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen AB, Webb C (1995) Ferrous sulphate oxidation using Thiobacillus ferrooxidans: a review. Proc Biochem 30:225–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konovalova VV, Dmytrenko GM, Nigmatullin RR, Bryk MT, Gvozdyak PI (2003) Chromium (VI) reduction in a membrane bioreactor with immobilized Pseudomonas cells. Enzyme Microb Technol 33:899–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs W, Brombacher C, Bosshard PP, Bachofen R, Brandl H (1997) Microbial recovery of metals from solids. FEMS Microbiol Rev 20:605–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Xu W, Zeng G, Li X, Gao H (2006) Cr (VI) reduction by Bacillus sp. isolated from chromium landfill. Process Biochem 41:1981–1986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panswad T, Chavalparti O, Chandung C, Anotai J (2001) Economic considerations of chromium recovery from tanning wastewater. Waste Manag Res 19:450–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porro S, Donati E, Tedesco P, (1990) Bioleaching of manganese (IV) oxide and application of its recovery from ores. Biotechnol Lett 12:845–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulkens WH, Grotenhuis JTC, Tichy R (1995) Methods of cleaning contaminated soils and sediments. In: Salomons W, Förstner U, Mader P (eds) Heavy Metals, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 151–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheltinga HMJ (1987) Sludge in agriculture: the European approach. Wat Sci Techn 19:9–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sisti F, Allegretti P, Donati E (1996) The reduction of dichromate by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biotechnol Lett 18:1477–1480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sisti F, Allegretti P, Donati E (1998) Bacterial reduction of hexavalent chromium by species of thiobacilli grown on sulphur. Appl Biol Sci 4:47–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman MP, Lundgren DG (1959) Studies on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Ferrobacillus ferrooxidans I. An improved medium and a harvesting procedure for securing high cell yields. J Bacteriol 77:642–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solisio C, Lodi A, Veglio F. (2002) Bioleaching of zinc and aluminium from industrial waste sludges by means of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Waste Manag 22:667–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souza PT, Torres-Mello N, Menezes MM, Montenegro MC, Araujo AN, Barros B, Lins V (2006) Extraction and recovery of chromium from electroplating sludge. J Hazard Mater 128:39–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sreekrishan TR, Tyagi RD (1996) A comparative study of the cost of leaching out heavy metals form sewage sludges. Proc Biochem 31:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichy R, Rulkens WH, Grotenhuis JTC, Nydl W, Cuypers C, Fajtl J (1998) Bioleaching of metals from soils or sediments. Water Sci Technol 37:119–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen O (1990) Biological fundaments of mineral leaching processes, microbial mineral recovery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 55–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Urone P (1955) Stability of colorimetric reagent for chromium, s- diphenylcarbazide, in various solvents. Anal Chem 27:1354–1355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veglio F, Beolchini F, Nardini A, Toro L (1999) Bioleaching of a pyrrhotite ore by sulfooxidans strain: kinetic analysis. Chem Eng Sci 55:783–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors from University of Cádiz wish to express their sincere gratitude to Dr. Donati from Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Fermentaciones Industriales (CINDEFI-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, where part of this research was carried out. This research was supported by Regional Goberment of Andalusia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gema Cabrera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cabrera, G., Viera, M., Gómez, J.M. et al. Bacterial removal of chromium (VI) and (III) in a continuous system. Biodegradation 18, 505–513 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-006-9083-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-006-9083-5

Keywords

Navigation