Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Native faunal communities depend on habitat from non-native plants in novel but not in natural ecosystems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Invasive non-native plants are a major driver of native biodiversity loss, yet native biodiversity can sometimes benefit from non-native species. Depending on habitat context, even the same non-native species can have positive and negative effects on biodiversity. Blackberry (Rubus fruticosus aggregate) is a useful model organism to better understand a non-native plant with conflicting impacts on biodiversity. We used a replicated capture-mark-recapture study across 11 consecutive seasons to examine the response of small mammal diversity and abundance to vegetation structure and density associated with non-native blackberry (R. anglocandicans) in native, hybrid and blackberry-dominated novel ecosystems in Australia. Across the three habitat types, increasing blackberry dominance had a positive influence on mammal diversity, while the strength and direction of this influence varied for abundance. At a microhabitat scale within hybrid and native habitat there were no significant differences in diversity, or the abundance of most species, between microhabitats where blackberry was absent versus dominant. In contrast, in novel ecosystems diversity and abundances were very low without blackberry, yet high (comparable to native ecosystems) within blackberry as it provided functionally-analogous vegetation structure and density to the lost native understory. Our results indicate the ecological functions of non-native plant species vary depending on habitat and need to be considered for management. Comparative studies such as ours that apply a standardized approach across a broad range of conditions at the landscape and habitat scale are crucial for guiding land managers on control options for non-native species (remove, reduce or retain and contain) that are context-sensitive and scale-dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMLRNRM (2008) Creating a sustainable future: An integrated natural resources management plan for the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges region. Volume A —State of the Region Report vol A. Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board,

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2013) Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, 0.999999-2 edn. R Core Team, Vienna

  • Bradley J (1988) Bringing back the bush: the Bradley method of bush regeneration. Lansdowne Press, Lansdowne

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Meteorology (2012) Climate Data Online

  • Castilla JC, Lagos NA, Cerda M (2004) Marine ecosystem engineering by the alien ascidian Pyura praeputialis on a mid-intertidal rocky shore. Marine Ecol Progress Ser 268:119–130. doi:10.3354/meps268119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catling PC, Burt RJ, Forrester RI (2002) Models of the distribution and abundance of ground-dwelling mammals in the eucalypt forests of north-eastern New South Wales in relation to environmental variables. Wildl Res 29:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffey CJ, Grant CD (2000) Fire management implications of fuel loads and vegetation structure in rehabilitated sand mines near Newcastle. Aust For Ecol Manag 129:269–278. doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(99)00171-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry TA (2010) Avifaunal ecology and responses to post-fire succession of buttongrass moorlands in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Ph.D thesis, University of Tasmania

  • Cochrane CH, Norton DA, Miller CJ, Allen RB (2003) Brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) diet in a north Westland mixed-beech (Nothofagus) forest. N Z J Ecol 27:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Government (1999) Environment protection and biodiversity conservation act 1999. Commonwealth Government, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153–166. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970201.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RB, Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Barry S, Welsh A (2005) Effects of trap position, trap history, microhabitat and season on capture probabilities of small mammals in a wet eucalypt forest. Wildl Res 32:657–671. doi:10.1071/wr04069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Sustainability E, Water, Population and Communities (2009) Australia’s 15 National Biodiversity Hotspots

  • Department of the Environment (2015) Isoodon obesulus obesulus in Species Profile and Threats Database. Canberra

  • Driscoll DA (2007) The diverse impacts of grazing, fire and weeds: how ecological theory can inform conservation management Managing and Designing Landscapes for Conservation: Moving from Perspectives to Principles: 111

  • Ewel JJ, Putz FE (2004) A place for alien species in ecosystem restoration. Front Ecol Environ 2:354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman E, McDonal N, Mac Nally R, Murphy DD, Walters J, Floyd T (2003) Effects of floristics, physiognomy and non-native vegetation on riparian bird communities in a Mojave Desert watershed. J Anim Ecol 72:484–490. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00718.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelling M, Macdonald DW, Mathews F (2007) Are hedgerows the route to increased farmland small mammal density? Use of hedgerows in British pastoral habitats. Landsc Ecol 22:1019–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough AE (2010) Are the ecological impacts of alien species misrepresented? A review of the “native good, alien bad” philosophy. Commun Ecol 11:13–21. doi:10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.1.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of South Australia (2013) National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. Government of South Australia. http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/A/NATIONAL%20PARKS%20AND%20WILDLIFE%20ACT%201972.aspx. Accessed 25 Oct 2006

  • Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall C (2013) Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world order. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models. Biometr J 50:346–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy PL, Lach L, Lugo AE, Hobbs RJ (2013) Fauna and Novel Ecosystems. In: Novel Ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp 127–141. doi:10.1002/9781118354186.ch14

  • Kettenring KM, Adams CR (2011) Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 48:970–979. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01979.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, M’Gonigle LK (2015) Small-scale restoration in intensive agricultural landscapes supports more specialized and less mobile pollinator species. J Appl Ecol 52:602–610. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kueffer C, Kronauer L, Edwards PJ (2009) Wider spectrum of fruit traits in invasive than native floras may increase the vulnerability of oceanic islands to plant invasions. Oikos 118:1327–1334. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17185.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kueffer C, Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2013) Integrative invasion science: model systems, multi-site studies, focused meta-analysis and invasion syndromes. New Phytol 200:615–633. doi:10.1111/nph.12415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y (2013) Conservation genetics of the endangered southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus) in South Australia. Ph.D, The University of Adelaide

  • Litt AR, Cord EE, Fulbright TE, Schuster GL (2014) Effects of invasive plants on arthropods. Conserv Biol 28:1532–1549. doi:10.1111/cobi.12350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Long K (2010) Recovery Plan For The Southern Brown Bandicoot In The Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia: 2010 to 2015. Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Long K (2013) Blackberry control in bandicoot country vol, 2nd edn. Government of South Australia, Athelstone

    Google Scholar 

  • Longland WS (2012) Small Mammals in Saltcedar (Tamarix ramosissima)-Invaded and Native Riparian Habitats of the Western Great Basin. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5:230–237. doi:10.1614/ipsm-d-11-00019.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE, Carlo TA, Wunderle JM Jr (2012) Natural mixing of species: novel plant-animal communities on Caribbean Islands. Anim Conserv 15:233–241. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00523.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin LJ, Murray BR (2011) A predictive framework and review of the ecological impacts of exotic plant invasions on reptiles and amphibians Biological Reviews 86:407–419. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00152.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mawson PR (2000) Conservation of native fauna inhabiting granite outcrops: how do you manage it? Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 83:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Meserve PL (1981) Resource partitioning in a Chilean semiarad small mammal community. J Anim Ecol 50:745–757. doi:10.2307/4134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilan W, Catterall CP, Kanowski J, McKenna S (2006) Do frugivorous birds assist rainforest succession in weed dominated oldfield regrowth of subtropical Australia? Biol Conserv 129:393–407. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nias R, Ford H (1992) The Influence of Group Size and Habitat on Reproductive Success in the Superb Fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus). Emu 92:238–243. doi:10.1071/MU9920238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSW Department of Primary Industries (2010) Blackberry: Weed of National Significance

  • Packer JG (2014) Invasive non-native plants retain native mammal communities in novel ecosystems. Ph.D thesis, The University of Adelaide

  • Pardini R, de Souza SM, Braga-Neto R, Metzger JP (2005) The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biol Conserv 124:253–266. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paull D (1992) The distribution, ecology and conservation of the southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus obesulus) in South Australia. Thesis (M.A.), University of Adelaide

  • Paull DJ, Mills DJ, Claridge AW (2013) Fragmentation of the Southern Brown Bandicoot Isoodon obesulus: unraveling Past Climate Change from Vegetation Clearing. Int J Ecol 2013:11. doi:10.1155/2013/536524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Jarosik V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vila M (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid AM, Morin L, Downey PO, French K, Virtue JG (2009) Does invasive plant management aid the restoration of natural ecosystems? Biol Conserv 142:2342–2349. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM (2011) Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Gaertner M (2013) Plant invasions as builders and shapers of novel ecosystems. In: novel ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp 102–113. doi:10.1002/9781118354186.ch11

  • Richardson DM, Rejmánek M (2011) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species–a global review. Divers Distrib 17:788–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson EL, Prescott A, Drew GJ (2010) Restoration of Grassy Woodland: Watiparinga reserve management plan. National Trust of South Australia,

  • Rodriguez LF (2006) Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur biological invasions 8:927–939. doi:10.1007/s10530-005-5103-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogalski MA, Skelly DK (2012) Positive effects of nonnative invasive Phragmites australis on larval bullfrogs. PloS one 7:e44420. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers P, Grashof-Bokdam CJ, Verboom J, Baveco JM, Jochem R, Meeuwsen HAM, Van Adrichem MHC (2009) Sacrificing patches for linear habitat elements enhances metapopulation performance of woodland birds in fragmented landscapes. Landsc Ecol 24:1123–1133. doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9313-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD (2011) The Potential Conservation Value of Non-Native Species. Conserv Biol 25:428–437. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01646.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Holmes S, Drickamer LC (2001) Impact of forest patch characteristics on small mammal communities: a multivariate approach. Biol Conserv 99:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt TR, Hobbs RJ, Suding KN (2008) Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Front Ecol Environ 6:547–553. doi:10.1890/070046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skurski TC, Maxwell BD, Rew LJ (2013) Ecological tradeoffs in non-native plant management. Biol Conserv 159:292–302. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogge MK, Sferra SJ, Paxton EH (2008) Tamarix as habitat for birds: implications for riparian restoration in the southwestern United States. Restor Ecol 16:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg JC (1998) Functional equivalency of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) and Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) along a free-flowing river. Wetlands 18:675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck S, Strahan R (eds) (2008) The Mammals of Australia, 3rd edn. Reed New Holland, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2012) gamm4: generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4, version 0.1. 6th edn. R Core Team, Vienna, Austria

  • Zavaleta ES, Hobbs RJ, Mooney HA (2001) Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends Ecol Evol 16:454–459. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02194-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Saveliev AA, Ieno EN (2012) Zero Inflated Models and Generalized Linear Mixed Models with R. Highland Statistics Ltd., Newburgh

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide (JGP), the Government of South Australia (JGP & SMC), Australian Geographic (JGP) and the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment (JGP & SMC). We gratefully acknowledge the support of all our fabulous field volunteers (especially Apu Kadam, Brian Matthews and Natalie Andrews) and generous land owner hosts (especially Della, Louise, Andrew and Liz), who made this research possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jasmin G. Packer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. Research was approved by the University of Adelaide Animal Ethics Committee (S-094-2007) and the South Australian Department for Environment and Heritage (U25562-1).

Additional information

Communicated by Péter Török.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 5467 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Packer, J.G., Delean, S., Kueffer, C. et al. Native faunal communities depend on habitat from non-native plants in novel but not in natural ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 25, 503–523 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1059-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1059-0

Keywords

Navigation