Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How does the discrepancies among taxonomists affect macroecological patterns? A case study of freshwater snails of Western Siberia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the point of view of biogeographers and ecologists, taxonomy is not only a means of ordering life but also a source of some problems able to impede the progress in studies of large-scale patterns of biological diversity. Discrepancies among systematists caused, inter alia, by their different views on the species concept and criteria for species delineation, are commonly thought to provoke errors and misinterpretations in macroecological inferences. In this study, we discuss a case of freshwater gastropods of Western Siberia. Two systematic frameworks, developed in Western Europe and Russia and drastically different in number of accepted genera and species, were proposed to classify the Palearctic aquatic snails. Having compared two sets of diversity data generated on the basis of the two systematic frameworks, we found that their parameters do not differ significantly. Such patterns as latitudinal gradients in total species richness, portion of branchiate snail species, and portion of species of non-European origin proved to remain the same, irrespective of which taxonomic approach, Western European, or Russian, is accepted. The absence of reliable changes in macroecological patterns may be explained by nearly consistent “splitting effort” applied by the Russian taxonomists in their revision of different families of aquatic snails. Thus, though the European and the Russian systematic frameworks differ significantly in number of accepted species, the large-scale patterns of diversity based on the two approaches are qualitatively the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowicz SJ, Purvis A (2005) How many branchiopod crustaceans are there? Quantifying the components of underestimation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agapow PM, Bininda-Edmonds ORP, Crandall KA, Gittleman JL, Mace GM, Marshall JC, Purvis A (2004) The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Quart Rev Biol 79:161–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allmon WD (1992) Genera in paleontology: definition and significance. Hist Biol 6:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alroy J (2002) How many named species are valid? Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 99:3706–3711

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchet P (2006) Valid until synonymized, or invalid until proven valid? A response to Davis (2004) on species check-lists. Malacologia 48:311–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco MA (2013) The impact of taxonomic bias when comparing past and present species diversity. Palaeogeogr Palaeclimatol Palaeoecol 372:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernogorenko EV (1988) On the species composition of viviparids (Gastropoda, Viviparidae) in Europe and western Asia. Zool Zhurn 67:645–655 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JA, May RM (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297:191–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft J (1983) Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr Ornitol 1:159–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis GM (2004) Species check-lists: death or revival of the Nouvelle École? Malacologia 46:227–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon S, Fjeldså J (2005) The implications of different species concepts for describing biodiversity patterns and assessing conservation needs for African birds. Ecography 28:682–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez E, Wheeler QD (1997) Taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics 13:267–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois A (1998) Lists of European species of amphibians and reptiles: will we soon be reaching “stability”? Amphibia-Reptilia 19:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois A (2011) Species and “strange species” in zoology: do we need a “unified concept of species”? Comptes Rendus Palevol 10:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista DA, Bourne G, Ware JL (2014) Species richness estimates of Blattoidea (Insecta: Dictyoptera) from northern Guyana vary depending upon methods of species delimitation. Syst Entomol 39:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner G, Bank RA, von Proschwitz T (2001) Check-list of the non-marine molluscan species-group taxa of the states of Northern, Atlantic and Central Europe (CLECOM I). Heldia 4:1–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Ballou JD, Dudash MR, Eldridge MDB, Fenster CB, Lacy RC, Mendelson JR III, Porton IJ, Ralls K, Ryder OA (2012) Implications of different species concepts for conserving biodiversity. Biol Conserv 153:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genner MJ, Seehausen O, Cleary DFR, Knight ME, Michel E, Turner GF (2004) How does the taxonomic status of allopatric populations influence species richness within African cichlid fish assemblages? J Biogeogr 31:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glöer P (2002) Die Sußwassergastropoden Nord- und Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungschlussel, Lebenweise, Verbreitung. Conchbooks, Hackenheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Glöer P, Georgiev D (2014) Redescription of Viviparus sphaeridius Bourguignat 1880 with an identification key of the European Viviparus species (Gastropoda: Viviparidae). Ecologica Montenegrina 1:96–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf DL (2007) Palearctic freshwater mussel (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoida) diversity and the Comparatory Method as a species concept. Proc Nat Sci Acad Phila 156:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausdorf B (2011) Progress toward a general species concept. Evolution 65:923–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heger TJ, Mitchell EAD, Ledenganck P, Vincke S, Van de Vijver B, Beyens L (2009) The curse of taxonomic uncertainty in biogeographical studies of free-living terrestrial protists: a case study of testate amoebae from Amsterdam Island. J Biogeogr 36:1551–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Vamosi SM, Latham SJ, Heilbuth JC, Day T (2000) Questioning species realities. Conserv Genet 1:67–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hey J, Waples RS, Arnold ML, Butlin RK, Harrison RG (2003) Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 18:597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac NJB, Mallet J, Mace GM (2004) Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:464–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones OR, Purvis A, Quicke DLJ (2012) Latitudinal gradients in taxonomic overdescription rate affect macroecological inferences using species list data. Ecography 35:333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafanov AI (1998) Recent and fossil Clinocardiinae (Bivalvia, Cardiidae) of the World. I. General part. Bull Mizunami Fossil Mus 25:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Korniushin AV (1998) Review of the studies on freshwater mollusc systematics carried out by the Russian taxonomic school. Malacol Rev Suppl. 7:65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Korniushin AV (2002) On the species diversity of freshwater bivalve mollusks in Ukraine and the strategy of their conservation. Vestn Zool 36:9–23 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglov ND, Starobogatov YI (1991) Generic composition of the family Acroloxidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) and the species of the genus Acroloxus found in the USSR. Zool Zhurn 70:66–80 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Küster HC (1852) Die Gattungen Paludina, Hydrocaena und Valvata. Bauer und Raspe, Nürnberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Löbl I, Leschen RAB (2014) Misinterpreting global species numbers: examples from Coleoptera. Syst Entomol 39:2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logvinenko BM, Starobogatov YI (1971) The curvature of the frontal section of a valve as a taxonomic character for bivalve mollusks. Nauč Dokl Vysš Shk. Biol Nauki 5:7–10 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Brook C (1993) Artaufassungen in Bereich der limnischen Mollusken und ihr Wahd im 20. Jahrhundert. Arch Molluske 122:133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Mina MV, Reshetnikov YuS, Dgebuadze YuYu (2006) Taxonomic novelties and problems for users. J Ichthyol 46:553–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell EAD, Meisterfeld R (2005) Taxonomic confusion blurs the debate on cosmopolitanism versus local endemism of free-living protists. Protist 156:263–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarenko AA (2001) Is unified conseption of species in ornithology possible or not? (Opinion of practicing taxonomist). Zhurn Obsh Biol 62:180–186 (In Russian)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson-Örtmann V, Nilsson AN (2010) Using taxonomic revision data to estimate the global species richness and characteristics of undescribed species of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Biodiv Inform 7:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Padial JM, de Riva I (2006) Taxonomic inflation and the stability of species lists: the perils of ostrich’s behavior. Syst Biol 55:859–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riddle BR, Hafner DJ (1999) Species as units of analysis in ecology and biogeography: time to take the blinders off. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 8:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell-Hunter WR (1964) Physiological aspects of ecology in non-marine molluscs. In: Wilbur KM, Yonge CM (eds) Physiology of Mollusca, vol 1. Academic Press, London, pp 83–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sangster G (2009) Increasing numbers of bird species result from taxonomic progress, not taxonomic inflation. Proc R Soc Lond 276B:3185–3191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard CRC (1998) Biodiversity patterns in Indian Ocean corals, and effects of taxonomic error in data. Biodiv Conserv 7:847–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shikov EV, Zatravkin MN (1991) The comparative method of taxonomic studies of Bivalvia used by Soviet malacologists. Malakol Abhandl Staatliche Museum für Tierkunde Dresden 15:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stålstedt A, Bergsten J, Ronquist F (2013) “Forms” of water mites (Acari: Hydrachnidia): intraspecific variation or valid species? Ecol Evol 3:3415–3435

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Starobogatov YI (1968) Practical demands of systematics and problem of species criteria. Zool Zhurn 47:875–886 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Starobogatov YI (1970) Molluscan fauna and zoogeographic zonation of continental freshwater bodies of the world. Nauka, Leningrad (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Starobogatov YI (1996) Species in theory and in the Nature. In: Pavlinov IY (ed) Current systematics: methodological aspects. Moscow State University Press, Moscow, pp 165–181 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Starobogatov YI, Prozorova LA, Bogatov VV, Saenko EM (2004) Molluscs. In: Tsalolikhin SY (ed) Key to freshwater invertebrates of Russia and adjacent lands. Molluscs, polychaetes, nemerteans. vol. 6. Nauka, Sankt-Peterburg, pp 9–492 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinarski MV (2011) A new species of stagnicoline snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae) from the extreme North of Western Siberia. Zootaxa 2817:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinarski MV, Glöer P (2008) Taxonomical notes on Euro-Siberian freshwater molluscs. 3. Galba occulta Jackiewicz, 1959 is a junior synonym of Limnaea palustris var. terebra Westerlund, 1885. Mollusca (Dresden) 26:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinarski MV, Andreev NI, Andreeva SI, Lazutkina EA, Karimov AV (2007) Diversity of gastropods in the inland waterbodies of Western Siberia. Invert Zool 4:173–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinarski MV, Andreyev NI, Andreyeva SI, Karimov AV, Lazutkina EA (2012a) Latitudinal changes in the diversity of freshwater gastropods (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in waterbodies of Western Siberia. Inland Water Biol 5:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinarski MV, Schniebs K, Glöer P, Son MO, Hundsdoerfer A (2012b) The steppe relics: taxonomic study on two lymnaeid species endemic to the former USSR (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Lymnaeidae). Arch Mollusk 141:67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhadin VI (1952) Mollusca of fresh and brackish waters of the USSR. In: Strelkov AA (ed) The key-books on fauna of the USSR, vol 43. AN SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, pp 1–346 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Prof. S.I. Andreyeva and Dr. E.A. Lazutkina (Omsk) provided their original data for compiling the “Russian” database of species distribution in Western Siberia. Dr. P.V. Kijashko and Mrs. L.L. Yarokhnovich (Saint-Petersburg) and Mr. M.E. Grebennikov (Yekaterinburg) are acknowledged for their invaluable help in work with the museum collections. Comments of two anonymous reviewers served to radical improvement of the original text. Financial support for this study was obtained from the Russian Fund for Basic Research (projects Nos. 12-04-98056-r_sibir_a and 14-04-01236) as well as from the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (project No. 6.1957.2014/К).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Museum of Siberian Aquatic Mollusks, Omsk State Pedagogical University, 14 Tukhachevskogo Emb, Omsk, Russian Federation, 644099

    Maxim V. Vinarski

  2. F.M. Dostoyevsky Omsk State University, 28 Andrianova Str., Omsk, Russia, 644077

    Maxim V. Vinarski

  3. Mykolayiv National Agrarian University, Parizhskoy Komuny Str., 9, Mykolayiv, 54020, Ukraine

    Sergei S. Kramarenko

Authors
  1. Maxim V. Vinarski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sergei S. Kramarenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim V. Vinarski.

Additional information

Communicated by David Hawksworth.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 107 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vinarski, M.V., Kramarenko, S.S. How does the discrepancies among taxonomists affect macroecological patterns? A case study of freshwater snails of Western Siberia. Biodivers Conserv 24, 2079–2091 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0934-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0934-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation