Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing long-term spatial changes of natural habitats using old maps and archival sources: a case study from Central Europe

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscapes intensively farmed over a long time period represent a threat for natural habitats and high levels of biodiversity. Information on the historical land use and spatial changes of natural habitats can help to explain the causes of a number of contemporary phenomena, which are important for the development of effective conservation and ecosystem management. This case study from the Czech Republic shows that archival written sources describing landscape quality, including vegetation cover, allow the reclassification of old maps to the level of natural habitat categories (sensu Natura 2000), with the aim of analyzing historic changes in land cover. Significant natural habitat decreases began by the middle of the 19th century. Over the course of 250 years, this area of formerly widespread natural wet meadows has declined by 99 %. An area of water vegetation was reduced by 95 %, willow carrs by 98 %, and a mosaic of willow carrs, wet Cirsium meadow, and alder carrs has decreased by 100 %. These decreases were caused by the conversion of meadows, pastures, and ponds into arable lands. Areas of oak-hornbeam forest, acidophilous oak forest, and thermophilous oak forest were primarily converted into monocultures of coniferous trees. Similarly, the areas with alluvial forests decreased. We conclude that old maps and other archive materials, despite their coarse accuracy, can serve as useful tools for disclosing natural habitat changes and their causes, providing a foundation for formulating biodiversity conservation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2003) General map of the Czech Republic 1: 10 000, digital version. MŽP, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2006a) Biotope mapping in the Czech Republic for the purpose of creating the system of European important protected areas of Natura 2000 in the Czech Republic. AOPK ČR 2000–2006, version 5/2006

  • Anonymous (2006b) The fundamental base of the geographic data of the Czech Republic (ZABAGED). ČÚZK, MŽP, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2008a) Geographical data provided by the Czech Environmental Information Agency (CENIA). http://geoportal.cenia.cz. Accessed 1 April 2008

  • Anonymous (2008b) Geographical data provided by the Forest Management Institute Brandýs nad Labem (ÚHÚL). http://212.158.143.149/ows/wms_jtsk.php. Accessed 1 April 2008

  • Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70:21–34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey D, Billeter R, Aviron S, Schweiger O, Herzog F (2007) The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes. Landsc Ecol 22:461–473. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9035-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin DJB, Weaver K, Schnekenburger F, Perera AH (2004) Sensitivity of landscape pattern indices to input data characteristics on real landscapes: implications for theirs use in natural disturbance emulation. Landsc Ecol 19:255–271. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000030442.96122.ef

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, Haase G (1992) Zur Kennzeichnung des biotischen Regulationspotentials im Rahmen von Landschaftsdiagnosen. Zeitschrift fü Ökologie und Naturschutz 1:23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender DJ, Contreras TA, Fahrig L (1998) Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology 79:517–533. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0517:HLAPDA]2.0.CO;2

  • Bender O, Boehmerb HJ, Jens D, Schumacher KP (2005) Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in Southern Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 70:111–125. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bičík I, Jeleček L, Štěpánek V (2001) Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy 18:65–73. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00047-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black J, Macraild DM (2007) Studying History. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Black AE, Strand E, Wright RG, Scott JM, Morgan P, Watson C (1998) Land use history at multiple scales: implications for conservation planning. Landsc Urban Plan 43:49–63. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00096-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botequilha-Leitão A, Miller J, Ahern J, McGarigal K (2006) Measuring landscapes: a planner´s handbook. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Brůna V, Křováková K (2006) Exploitation of old maps of medium and large scale for investigation of forest development. In: Neuhöferová P (ed) Forests history and development in the Czech countries. Department of Silviculture FLE ČZU, Praha, pp 111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce RGH, Bogers MMB, Evans D, Halada L, Jongman RHG, Mücher CA (2012) The significance of habitats as indicators of biodiversity and their links to species. Ecol Indic 33:19–25. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajthaml J, Krejčí J (2008) Exploitation of old maps for landscape research. Abstract of paper No. 18, GIS, Ostrava, pp 1-10

  • Chytrý M, Kučera T, Kočí M, Grulich V, Lustyk P (eds) (2010) Katalog biotopů České republiky—druhé vydání. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO, Ohlson H, Erickson O (2007) Effects of historical and present fragmentation on plant species diversity in semi-natural grasslands in Swedish rural landscapes. Landsc Ecol 22:723–730. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9067-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO, Vanhoenacker D (2011) Detection of extinction debt depends on scale and specialisation. Biol Conserv 144:782–787. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98081.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domaas ST (2007) The reconstruction of past patterns of tilled fields from historical cadastral maps using GIS. Landsc Res 32:23–43. doi:10.1080/01426390601097511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald P, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, van Bommel FPJ (2006) Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990-2000. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:189–196. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endfield GH, O’Hara SL (1999) Degradation, drought, and dissent: an environmental history of Colonial Michoacán, West Central Mexico. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 89:402–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142. doi:10.1017/S1464793105006949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster DR (1992) Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. J Ecol 80:753–772. doi:10.2307/2260864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froněk D (2009) Vývoj struktury a počtu pěstitelů řepy na území dnešní ČR. Listy cukrovarnické a řepařské 125:351–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Girel J, Vautier F, Peiry JL (2003) Biodiversity and land use history of the alpine riparian landscapes (the example of the Isère river valley, France). In: Mander Ü, Antrop M (eds) Multifunctional Landscapes. Continuity and Change. WIT-Press, Southampton, pp 167–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Grešlová Kušková P (2013) A case study of the Czech agriculture since 1918 in a socio-metabolic perspective—from land reform through nationalisation to privatisation. Land Use Policy 30:592–603. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156. doi:10.1007/s100219900011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson EJ, Parker GR (1994) Using an index of habitat patch proximity for landscape design. Landsc Urban Plan 29:117–130. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)90022-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson E, Lennartsson T, Emanuelsson M (2007) Land use more than 200 years ago explains current grassland plant diversity in a Swedish agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv 138:47–59. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guth J (ed) (2002) Metodika mapování biotopů soustavy Natura 2000 a Smaragd. AOPK ČR, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth J, Kučera T (2005) Natura 2000 habitat mapping in the Czech Republic: methods and general results. Ekológia (Bratislava) 24:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamre LN, Domaas ST, Austad I, Rydgren K (2007) Land-cover and structural changes in a western Norwegian cultural landscape since 1865, based on an old cadastral map and a field survey. Landsc Ecol 22:1563–1574. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9154-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (2011) Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. AMBIO 40:248–255. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0147-3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J et al (2008) Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe—a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:60–71. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herben T, Münzbergová Z, Mildén M, Ehrlén J, Cousins SAO, Eriksson O (2006) Long-term spatial dynamics of Succisa pratensis in a changing rural landscape: linking dynamical modeling with historical maps. J Ecol 94:131–143. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01063.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heubes J, Retzer V, Schmidtlein S, Beierkuhnlein C (2011) Historical land use explains current distribution of calcareous grassland species. Folia Geobot 46:1–16. doi:10.1007/s12224-010-9090-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooftman DAP, Bullock JM (2012) Mapping to inform conservation: a case study of changes in semi-natural habitats and their connectivity over 70 years. Biol Conserv 145:30–38. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Bullock JM, Hooftman DAP (2013) Mapping ecosystem service and biodiversity changes over 70 years in a rural English county. J Appl Ecol 50:841–850. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlík P, Poschlod P (2009) History or abiotic filter: which is more important in determining the species composition of calcareous grasslands? Preslia 81:321–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienast F (1993) Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a geographical information system—a methodological outline. Land Ecol 8:103–118. doi:10.1007/BF00141590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiviniemi K, Eriksson O (2002) Size-related deterioration of semi-natural grasslands fragments in Sweden. Divers Distrib 8:21–29. doi:10.1046/j.1366-9516.2001.00125.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I, Schmidt E, Sigel B (eds) (1998) Naturschutz und Denkmalpflege—Wege zu einem Dialog im Garten. Hochsch.-Verl. an der ETH, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause B, Culmsee H, Wesche K, Bergmeier E, Leuschner C (2011) Habitat loss of floodplain meadows in north Germany since the 1950s. Biodivers Conserv 20:2347–2364. doi:10.1007/s10531-011-9988-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kümmerle T, Radeloff VC, Perzanowski K, Hostert P (2006) Cross-border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in Eastern Europe using a hybrid classification technique. Remote Sens Environ 103:449–464. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipský Z (1995) The changing face of the Czech rural landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 31:39–45. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)01034-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallinis G, Emmanoloudis D, Giannakopoulos V, Maris F, Koutsias N (2011) Mapping and interpreting historical land cover/land use changes in a Natura 2000 site using earth observational data: the case of Nestos delta, Greece. Appl Geogr 31:312–320. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCollin D, Moore L, Sparks T (2000) The flora of a cultural landscape: environmental determinants of change revealed using archival sources. Biol Conserv 92:249–263. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00070-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html Accessed 16 Dec 2013

  • Mikyška R (ed) (1968) Geobotanická mapa ČSSR. 1. České země. Academia, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser D, Zecgmeister HG, Plutzar Ch, Sauberer N, Wrbka T, Grabherr G (2002) Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landsc Ecol 17:657–669. doi:10.1023/A:1021513729205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münzbergová Z, Cousins SAO, Herben T, Plačková I, Mildén M, Ehrlén J (2013) Historical habitat connectivity affects current genetic structure in a grassland species. Plant Biol 15:195–202. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00601.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäuslová Z (ed) (2001) Mapa potenciální přirozené vegetace České republiky. Academia, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldus J (1919) Die Militärischen Aufnahmen im Bereiche der Habsburgischen Länder aus der Zeit Kaiser Josephs II. Hölder, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Patch Analyst 5 for ArcGIS. http://www.cnfer.on.ca/SEP/patchanalyst. Accessed 28 Feb 2014

  • Plieninger T, Pulido FJ, Konold W (2003) Effects of land-use history on size structure of holm oak stands in Spanish dehesas: implications for conservation and restoration. Environ Conserv 30:61–70. doi:10.107/S0376892903000055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokorná A, Houfková P, Novák J, Bešta T, Kovačiková L, Nováková K, Zavřel J, Starec P (2014) The oldest Czech fishpond discovered? An interdisciplinary approach to reconstruction of local vegetation in mediaeval Prague suburbs. Hydrobiologia 730:191–213. doi:10.1007/s10750-014-1837-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poschlod P, Bakker JP, Kahmen S (2005) Changing land use and its impact on biodiversity. Basic Appl Ecol 6:93–98. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2004.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel RS, Kaukinen D, Carr AP (2012) Patch analyst and patch grid. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay

    Google Scholar 

  • Renetzeder Ch, Schindler S, Peterseil J, Prinz MA, Mücher S, Wrbka T (2010) Can we measure ecological sustainability? Landscape pattern as an indicator for naturalness and land use intensity at regional, national and European level. Ecol Ind 10:39–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaloš J, Weber M, Lipský Z, Trpáková I, Šantrůčková M, Uhlířová L, Kukla P (2011) Using old military survey maps and orthophotograph maps to analyse long-term land cover changes—case study (Czech Republic). Appl Geogr 31:426–438. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaloš J, Engstová B, Trpáková I, Šantrůčková M, Podrázský V (2012a) Long-term changes in forest cover 1780–2007 in central Bohemia, Czech Republic. Eur J For Res 131:871–884. doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0560-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaloš J, Molnárová K, Kottová P (2012b) Land reforms reflected in the farming landscape in East Bohemia and in Southern Sweden—two faces of modernisation. Appl Geogr 35:114–123. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklenička P, Lhota T (2002) Landscape heterogenity—a quantitative criterion for landscape reconstruction. Landsc Urban Plan 58:147–156. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00217-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklenička P, Molnárová K, Brabec E, Kumble P, Pittnerová B, Pixová K, Šálek M (2009) Remnants of medieval field patterns in the Czech Republic: analysis of driving forces behind their disappearance with special attention to the role of hedgerows. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:465–473. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrel JP (1998) Using geographic information systems to evaluate forest fragmentation and identify wildlife corridor opportunities in Cataraqui Watershed. York University, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Štengl R (1992) Die Zuckerindustrie in Böhmen und Mähren. Zuckerindustrie 177:435–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó P (2010) Why history matters in ecology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Environ Conserv 37:380–387. doi:10.1017/S0376892910000718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uuemaa E, Mander Ü, Marja R (2013) Trend in the use of landscape spatial metrics as ecological indicators: a review. Ecol Ind 28:100–106. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eetvelde V, Antrop M (2009) Indicators for assessing changing landscape character of cultural landscapes in Flanders (Belgium). Land Use Policy 26:901–910. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellend M, Brown CD, Kharouba HM, McCune JL, Myers-Smith IH (2013) Historical Ecology: using unconventional data sources to test for effects of global environmental change. Am J Bot 100:1294–1305. doi:10.3732/ajb.1200503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • V-LATE 1.1 for ArcGIS 9. https://sites.google.com/site/largvlate/gis-tools/v-late. Accessed 28 Feb 2014

  • Vos W, Meekes H (1999) Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc Urban Plan 46:3–14. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz U (2011) Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity. Living Rev Landsc Res 5:2–35. doi:10.12942/lrlr-2011-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear D, Bolstad P (1998) Land-use changes in southern Appalachian landscapes: spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems 1:575–594. doi:10.1007/s100219900052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahlheimer WA (2001) Die farn- und Blütenpflanzen Niederbayerns, ihre Gefährdung und Schutzbedürftigkeit—mit Erstfassung einer Roten Liste. Hoppea. Denkschrift der Regensburger Botanischen Gesellschaft 62:5–347

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the NAKI grant of the Ministry of Culture, Czech Republic, No. DF12P01OVV001, the Protection and management of historic cultural landscapes through Landscape Conservation Areas. The authors owe special thanks to Lenka Stroblová for her assistance in the analysis of old maps. Three anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on the previous version of the text.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markéta Šantrůčková.

Additional information

Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šantrůčková, M., Dostálek, J. & Demková, K. Assessing long-term spatial changes of natural habitats using old maps and archival sources: a case study from Central Europe. Biodivers Conserv 24, 1899–1916 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0912-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0912-x

Keywords

Navigation