Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Incorporating critical elements of city distinctiveness into urban biodiversity conservation

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conservation of biological diversity is closely linked with the fate of the world’s cities. While the protection of sensitive and threatened species and habitats has often taken place in natural landscapes largely devoid of people, strategies for preserving the Earth’s biodiversity that can be employed within cities are likely to become more common as urban areas continue to increase in size and number. Progress towards the development of effective conservation methods for working in urban areas is impeded by several factors, including the unfamiliarity that many conservation scientists have with urban landscapes, and the need to identify and incorporate elements of an urban area’s distinctiveness into biodiversity conservation projects. Even cities of the same size differ significantly in terms of their bio/geo/ecological realm or “natural” environment, their human communities, and their built environment, and these differences matter for the development of urban conservation strategies. Conservation practitioners can effectively incorporate information about these differences into their implementation efforts by: using a robust adaptive management framework that allows for an iterative approach in the development of strategies, employing the ecosystems concept when working in project areas that include urban spaces, incorporating pre-existing socioeconomic data into urban conservation planning, and harnessing technological and other resources readily available within urban areas to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams LW (2005) Urban wildlife ecology and conservation: a brief history of the discipline. Urban Ecosyst 8:139–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvey AA (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For Urban Green 5:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Moore JL, Brooks T, Burgess N, Hansen LA, Williams P, Rahbek C (2001) Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291:2616–2619

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ban NC, Hansen GJ, Jones M, Vincent AC (2009) Systematic marine conservation planning in data-poor regions: socioeconomic data is essential. Mar Policy 33:794–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Banham R (1971) Los Angeles: the architecture of four ecologies. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley T (2009) Planning for coastal resilience: best practices for calamitous times. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck MW, Brumbaugh RD, Airoldi L, Carranza A, Coen LD, Crawford C, Defeo O, Edgar GJ, Hancock B, Kay MC, Lenihan HS, Luckenbach MW, Toropova CL, Zhang G, Guo X (2011) Oyster reefs at risk and recommendations for conservation, restoration, and management. Bioscience 61:107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller EE, Grossinger RM, Salomon MN, Dark SJ, Stein ED, Orr BK, Downs PW, Longcore TR, Coffman GC, Whipple AA, Askevold RA, Stanford B, Beagle JR (2011) Historical ecology of the lower Santa Clara River, Ventura River, and Oxnard Plain: an analysis of terrestrial, riverine, and coastal habitats. San Francisco Estuary Institute, Prepared for the State Coastal Conservancy, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2002) Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renew Resour J 20:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg P, Dasmann R (1977) Reinhabiting California. Ecol 7:399–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA (2007) Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshw Biol 52:738–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwagen BG (2007) Connectivity in urbanizing landscapes: The importance of habitat configuration, urban area size, and dispersal. Urban Ecosyst 10:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland RL, Tully J, Greenwood JJD (2004) Birds breeding in British gardens: an underestimated population? Bird Study 51:96–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DMJS (1998) The impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on the Australian biota. New Phytol 140:385–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley CA, Altizer S (2007) Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol Evol 22:95–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brumbaugh RD, Coen LD (2009) Contemporary approaches for small-scale oyster reef restoration to address substrate versus recruitment limitation: a review and comments relevant for the Olympia oyster, Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864. J Shellfish Res 28:147–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2008) Urban principles for ecological landscape design and management: scientific fundamentals. Cities Environ 1:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB, Crowder LB, Mumford K (1999) Current normative concepts in conservation. Conserv Biol 13:22–35

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2010) Population Finder. (http://www.census.gov/popfinder/). U.S. Census Bureau, Retrieved 01-31-2013.

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho M-R (2010) The politics of urban nature restoration: the case of Cheonggyecheon restoration in Seoul, Korea. Int Dev Plan Rev 32:145–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cincotta RP, Wisnewski J, Engelman R (2000) Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404:990–992

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke LW, Jenerette GD, Davila A (2013) The luxury of vegetation and the legacy of tree biodiversity in Los Angeles, CA. Landsc Urban Plan 116:48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffey DJ, Joseph PH (2013) A polarized environment: the effect of partisanship and ideological values on individual recycling and conservation behavior. Am Behav Sci 57:116–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins JP, Kinzig AP, Grimm NB, Fagan WF, Hope D, Wu J, Borer ET (2000) A new urban ecology. Am Sci 88:416–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras V, Martínez-Meyer E, Valiente E, Zambrano L (2009) Recent decline and potential distribution in the last remnant area of the microendemic Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Biol Conserv 142:2881–2885

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon W (1991) Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. W. W. Norton and Company Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham L (2010) A state of change: forgotten landscapes of California. Heydey Books, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dark, S, Stein E, Bram D, Osuna J, Monteferante J, Longcore T, Grossinger R, Beller E (2011) Historical ecology of the Ballona Creek Watershed. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Technical Report 671

  • Dearborn DC, Kark S (2009) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24:432–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt HR (1987) The impact of prehistoric agriculture and land occupation on natural vegetation. Trends Ecol Evol 2:39–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan GH, Butry DT, Michael YL, Prestemon JP, Liebhold AM, Gatziolis D, Mao MY (2013) The relationship between trees and human health: evidence from the spread of the Emerald Ash Borer. Am J Prev Med 44:139–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone J (1996) Conservation in the Delaware River Basin. J Am Water Works Assoc 88:42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (2014) Urban ecology: science of cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrt SD (2007) Ecology of coyotes in urban landscapes. Proceedings of the 12th Wildlife Damage Management Conference 63:303–311

  • Gliwicz J, Goszczyñski J, Luniak M (1994) Characteristic features of animal populations under synurbization––the case of the Blackbird and of the Striped Field Mouse. Memorab Zool 49:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel T, Waters MR, O’Rourke DH (2008) The late Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas. Science 319:1497–1502

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon A, Simondson D, White M, Moilanen A, Bekessy SA (2009) Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 91:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J (1961) Megalopolis: the urbanized northeastern seaboard of the United States. Twentieth Century Fund, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Grove JG, Pickett ST, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson L (2002) Presence and abundance of red-listed plant species in Swedish forests. Conserv Biol 16:377–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth JL, Green JC, Kellstedt LA, Smidt CE (1995) Faith and the environment: religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. Am J Polit Sci 39:364–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie DA (1974) Suburban bird populations in southern California. Am Midl Nat 92:461–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassig R (1994) Mexico and the Spanish conquest. Loughman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen N, Perkins HA, Roy P (2006) The political ecology of uneven urban green space the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Aff Rev 42:3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA et al (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA (2009) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and Restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 24:599–603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica [IBGE] (2014) 2014 Brazilian Cities Population Estimates.(ftp.ibge.gov.br/Estimativas_de_Populacao/Estimativas_2014/estimativa_dou_2014.pdf) Retrieved 10-02-14.

  • Jim C, Liu H (2001) Species diversity of three major urban forest types in Guangzhou City, China. For Ecol Manag 146:99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight AT, Cowling RM, Rouget M, Balmford A, Lombard AT, Campbell BM (2008) Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research–implementation gap. Conserv Biol 22:610–617

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Sodhi NS (2004) Importance of reserves, fragments, and parks for butterfly conservation in a tropical urban landscape. Ecol Appl 14:1695–1708

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn I, Brandl R, Klotz S (2004) The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res 6:749–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature deficit disorder. Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Luniak M (2004) Synurbization––adaptation of animal wildlife to urban development. Pages 50-55 in International Urban Wildlife Symposium, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

  • Martin CA, Warren PS, Kinzig AP (2004) Neighborhood socioeconomic status is a useful predictor of perennial landscape vegetation in residential neighborhoods and embedded small parks of Phoenix, AZ. Landsc Urban Plan 69:355–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff J, Shulenberger E, Endlicher W, Bradley G, Alberti M, Ryan C, Simon U, ZumBrunnen C (eds) (2008) Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matteson KC, Ascher JS, Lagellotto GA (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:140–150

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RI, Kareiva P, Forman RTT (2008) The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 141:1695–1703

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ (2011) The history of urban ecology––an ecologist’s perspective. In: Niemelä J, Breuste JH, Guntenspergen G, McIntyre NE, Elmqvist T (eds) Urban ecology: patterns, processes and applications. Oxford Biology, Oxford UK, pp 5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath B, Pickett STA (2011) The metacity: a conceptual framework for integrating ecology and urban design. Challenges 2:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre NE (2000) Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:825–835

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson G, Simpson JR, Peper PJ, Maco SE, Xiao Q (2005) Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. J For 103:411–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelson GM, Gonzalez A, Peterson GD (2007) Economic inequality predicts biodiversity loss. PLoS One 2(5):e444

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:430–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Missiakoulis S (2010) Cecrops, King of Athens: the first (?) recorded population census in history. Int Stat Rev 78:413–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz AA (2005) The emergence and development of the politics of recognition of cultural diversity and indigenous peoples’ rights in Mexico: chiapas and Oaxaca in comparative perspective. J Lat Am Stud 37:585–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nestler JM, Theiling CH, Lubinski KS, Smith DL (2010) Reference condition approach to restoration planning. River Res Appl 26:1199–1219

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service [NSW-NPWS] (2003) The Bioregions of New South Wales: their biodiversity, conservation and history. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hurstville, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak DJ, Noble MH, Sisinni SM, Dwyer JF (2001) People and trees: assessing the US urban forest resource. J For 99:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics [ONS] (2013). Statistical bulletin: annual mid-year population estimates. (http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/pop-estimate/population-estimates-for-uk--england-and-wales--scotland-and-northern-ireland/2013/index.html) Retrieved 10-8-2014.

  • Opdam P, Steingröver E, Rooij SV (2006) Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:322–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavao-Zuckerman MA (2008) The nature of urban soils and their role in ecological restoration in cities. Restor Ecol 16:642–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi LA, Holland SM, Stein TV (2004) Achieving bat conservation through tourism. J Ecotour 3:195–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Brush GS, Felson AJ, McGrath BP, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Szlavecz K, Swan CS, Warren PS (2012) Understanding and working with urban biodiversity: the Baltimore ecosystem study. Citygreen 4:68–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to north America’s ash resource. J For 104:118–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S (2008) Why conservation planning needs socioeconomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:6505–6506

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postel SL, Thompson BH (2005) Watershed protection: capturing the benefits of nature’s water supply services. Nat Resour Forum 29:98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH (1999) The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conserv Biol 13:484–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Project for Public Spaces (2012) Placemaking and the future of cities (http://www.pps.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/PPS-Placemaking-and-the-Future-of-Cities.pdf). UN-HABITAT Sustainable Urban Development Network, Retrieved 07-25-2013.

  • Public Broadcasting Service [PBS] Experience (2007) The Mormons (http://www.pbs.org/mormons/faqs/structure.html). WGBH Educational Foundation, Retrieved 01-24-2013.

  • Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Sixtová Z, Weber E (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, Roux DJ, Cowling RM, Ginsburg AE, Nel JL, O’Farrell P (2010) Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conserv Biol 24:957–965

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (2003) Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37:194–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin ES, Boyce WM, Stermer CJ, Torresb SG (2002) Bighorn sheep habitat use and selection near an urban environment. Biol Conserv 104:251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd H, Vala J, Schaefer V (2002) Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restor Ecol 10:368–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 17:474–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M, Grabowiecki P (2007) Review of permeable pavement systems. Build Environ 42:3830–3836

    Google Scholar 

  • Secco G, Zulian G (2008) Modeling the social benefits of urban parks for users. In: Carreiro MM et al (eds) Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests, 3rd edn. Springer, New York, pp 312–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat DE, Ellison CG (2007) Structuring the religion-environment connection: identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. J Sci Study Relig 46:71–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz A, Cosquer A, Jaillon A, Piron A, Julliard R, Raymond R, Simon L, Prévot-Julliard A-C (2012) Urban biodiversity, city-dwellers and conservation: how does an outdoor activity day affect the human-nature relationship? PLoS One 7:e38642

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth D, Roberts D, Browne L (2009) Impacts of unregulated harvesting on a recovering stock of native oysters (Ostrea edulis). Mar Pollut Bull 58:916–922

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Terborgh J (1999) Conserving nature at regional and continental scales—a scientific program for North America. Bioscience 49:809–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinks PQ, Pauly GB, Crayon JJ, Shaffer HB (2003) Survival of the western pond turtle (Emys marmorata) in an urban California environment. Biol Conserv 113:257–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Beancourt JL (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol Appl 9:1189–1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Takano T, Nakamura K, Watanabe M (2002) Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:913–918

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy [TNC] (2013) Urban conservation (http://my.nature.org/nature/posts/public/should-conservation-be-a-walk.html). The Nature Conservancy, Retrieved 07-25-2013.

  • The NatureConservancy [TNC] (2000) Conservation by design: a framework for mission success. TNC, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • The NatureConservancy [TNC] (2007) Conservation action planning: developing strategies, taking action, and measuring success at any scale. Overview of Basic Practices Version, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald DM (2004) Placing exurban land-use change in a human modification framework. Front Ecol Environ 2:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Timbrook J, Johnson JR, Earle D (1982) Vegetation burning by the Chumash. J Calif Great Basin Anthropol 4:163–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Lima P, Canabal-Cristiani B, Burela-Rueda G (1994) Urban sustainable agriculture: the paradox of the chinampa system in Mexico City. Agric Hum Values 11:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge JM, Campbell WK, Freeman EC (2012) Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. J Pers Soc Psychol 102:1045–1062

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood JG, Francis J, Gerber LR (2011) Incorporating biodiversity conservation and recreational wildlife values into smart growth land use planning. Landsc Urban Plan 100:136–143

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-HABITAT (2008) State of the World’s Cities 2008/2009––Harmonious Cities United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT). http://www.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=2562

  • Utzinger J, Keiser J (2006) Urbanization and tropical health—then and now. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 100:5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining J, Merrick MS, Price EA (2008) The distinction between humans and nature: human perceptions of connectedness to nature and elements of the natural and unnatural. Hum Ecol Rev 15:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Callejas Linares A, López Falfán IS, Méndez García J, Suárez Guerrero AI, Suárez Guerrero MG (1999) National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 29:375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Kitzes J, Moran D, Goldfinger S, Thomas M (2006) The ecological footprint of cities and regions: comparing resource availability with resource demand. Environ Urban 18:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren PS, Ryan RL, Lerman SB, Tooke KA (2011) Social and institutional factors associated with land use and forest conservation along two urban gradients in Massachusetts. Landsc Urban Plan 102:82–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Waylen KA, Fischer A, McGowan PJK, Thirgood SJ, Milner-Gulland EJ (2010) Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions. Conserv Biol 24:1119–1129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb RH, Steiger JW, Wilshire HG (1986) Recovery of compacted soils in Mojave-Desert ghost towns. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1341–1344

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb RH, Steiger JW, Turner RM (1987) Dynamics of Mojave Desert shrub assemblages in the Panamint Mountains, California. Ecology 68:478–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman A (2007) The World Without Us. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White JG, Antos MJ, Fitzsimons JA, Palmer GC (2005) Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation. Landsc Urban Plan 71:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth C (1997) The governmental response to environmental degradation in the Xochimilco ecological zone of Mexico City. Prepared for delivery at the 1997 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Guadalajara, MX

  • Wood C, Sullivan B, Iliff M, Fink D, Kelling S (2011) eBird: engaging birders in science and conservation. PLoS Biol 9:e1001220

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodard C (2011) American nations: a history of the eleven rival regional cultures of North America. Viking Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu JX, Cheng X, Xiao HS, Wang H, Yang LZ, Ellis EC (2009) Agricultural landscape change in China’s Yangtze Delta, 1942–2002: a case study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:523–533

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Stacey Solie, John Randall, Peter Kareiva, Shona Ganguly, Andrea Martin, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript, and The Nature Conservancy for support during the writing process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Nature Conservancy, 601 S. Figueroa St., Suite 1425, Los Angeles, CA, 90017, USA

    Sophie S. Parker

Authors
  1. Sophie S. Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie S. Parker.

Additional information

Communicated by Karen E. Hodges.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parker, S.S. Incorporating critical elements of city distinctiveness into urban biodiversity conservation. Biodivers Conserv 24, 683–700 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0832-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0832-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation