Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bayesian occupancy monitoring for Annamite endemic biodiversity in central Vietnam

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the crisis facing South-east Asian biodiversity evidence led conservation, including assessing the impact of innovative protected area management models, is urgently needed. Bayesian statistics provide an intuitive way to interpret biodiversity monitoring data but are largely unused, or poorly understood, by field biologists and protected area managers. We built Bayesian occupancy models for two threatened endemics of the Annamite mountains: northern yellow-cheeked gibbon Nomascus (gabriellae) annamensis and crested argus Rheinardia ocellata ocellata based on auditory surveys in three protected areas in central Vietnam. Occupancy of 2 × 2-km grid cells across the landscape was 0.76 ± SE 0.03 for northern yellow-cheeked gibbon and 0.68 ± SE 0.05 for crested argus. Models predicted higher probability of gibbon occurrence at lower elevations and higher probability of crested argus presence with increasing dense forest cover. Bayesian modeling is a useful tool for assessing the effectiveness of conservation interventions and for measuring progress against conservation goals. The wider application of Bayesian statistics in conservation monitoring should allow more intuitive and user-friendly representation of sampling uncertainty, including visual representation of probability distributions and more rigorous testing for changes in the status of conservation targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baltzer M, Dao NT, Shore RG (2001) Towards a vision of biodiversity conservation in the forests for the lower Mekong ecoregion complex. WWF Indochina, Hanoi

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife International red data book. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickle NW, Duckworth JW, Tordoff AW, Poole CM, Timmins R, McGowan PJK (2008) The status and conservation of Galliformes in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. Biodivers Conserv 17:1393–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook S, van Coeverden de Groot C, Scott P, Boag B, Long R, Ley E, Reischer GH, Williams AC, Mahood SP, Hien TM, Polet G, Cox N, Hai BT (2012) Integrated and novel survey methods for rhinoceros populations confirm the extinction of Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus from Vietnam. Biol Conserv 155:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doniol-Valcroze T, Gosselin JF, Hammill MO (2013) Population modeling and harvest advice under the precautionary approach for eastern Hudson Bay beluga (Delphinapterus leucas). DFO Can Sci Advis Sec Res Doc 2012:168

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury R (2011) Hungry for success: urban consumer demand for wild animal products in Vietnam. Conserv Soc 9:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth JW (2008) Preliminary gibbon status review for Lao PDR 2008. Fauna & Flora International Indochina Programme, Vientiane

  • Duckworth JW, Batters G, Belant JL et al (2012) Why South-east Asia should be the world’s priority for averting imminent species extinctions, and a call to join a developing cross-institutional programme to tackle this urgent issue. Surv Perspect Integr Environ Soc 5:77–95. http://sapiens.revues.org/1327

  • Efford MG, Dawson DK (2012) Occupancy in continuous habitat. Ecosphere, 3, article 32

  • Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray TNE (2012) Studying large mammals with imperfect detection: status and habitat preferences of wild cattle and large carnivores in eastern Cambodia. Biotropica 44:531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray TNE, Phan C, Long B (2010) Modelling species distribution at multiple spatial scales: gibbon habitat preferences in a fragmented landscape. Anim Conserv 13:324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Sodhi NS (2010) Conserving Southeast Asia’s imperiled biodiversity: scientific, management, and policy challenges. Biodvers Conserv 19:913–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF (2007) Forest destruction in tropical Asia. Curr Sci 93:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim NL, Giam X, Byrnes G, Clements GR (2013) Occurrence of the Sunda colugo (Galeopterus variegatus) in the tropical forests of Singapore: a Bayesian approach. Mamm Biol 78:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie D, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey LL, Hines JE (2006) Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Elsevier, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MA (2007) Bayesian methods for ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nijman V (2010) An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia. Biodvers Conserv 19:1101–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly HJ, Evans TDE, Stoke EJ, Clements TJ, An D, Gately M, Nut M, Pollard EHB, Men S, Walston J (2012) Identify conservation successes, failures and future opportunities; assessing recovery potential of wild ungulates and tiger in eastern Cambodia. PLoS ONE 7:e40482

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer M (2009) JAGS Version 1.0.3 manual. http://sourceforge.net/projects/mcmc-jags

  • Pullin AS, Knight TM (2009) Doing more good than harm—building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biol Conserv 142:931–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin AS, Sutherland W, Gardner TA, Kapos V, Fa JE (2013) Conservation priorities: identifying need, taking action and evaluating success. In: MacDonald D, Willis K (eds) Key topics in conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins CS, Bystrak D, Geissler PH (1986) The breeding bird survey: its first fifteen years, 1965–1979. Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz D (2011) Statistical inference and decision making in conservation biology. Isr J Ecol Evol 57:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F et al (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat and knowledge. Science 322:225–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segan DB, Bottrill MC, Baxter PW, Possingham HP (2010) Using conservation evidence to guide management. Conserv Biol 25:200–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW (2009) A meta-analysis of the impact of anthropogenic forest disturbance on Southeast Asia’s biotas. Biotropica 41:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J Roy Stat Soc B 64:583–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley SA, Hackman R, Ferrand F (2013) REDD feasibility study for Xe Sap NPA and Hue and Quang Nam Saola Reserves, Lao PDR and Vietnam, Forest Carbon and WWF Laos, Vientiane

  • Stone R (2006) The saola’s last stand. Science 314:1380–1383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade PR (2000) Bayesian methods in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 14:1308–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work forms part of the CarBi project of WWF Greater Mekong largely funded by KfW Bankengruppe and WWF Germany. For permission to work in the study landscape we thank the Thua Thien Hue and Quang Nam Provincial People’s Committee and the management board of Hue and Quang Nam Saola Reserves and Bach Ma National Park. Mike Meredith provided statistical advice and an anonymous reviewer improved the quality of the manuscript. Michael Dine, David Zeller, Thinh Van Ngoc, Fanie Bekker, Anh Le Thuy and Hung Luong Viet provided logistical assistance and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas N. E. Gray.

Additional information

Communicated by David L. Hawksworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, T.N.E., Nguyen Quang, H.A. & Nguyen Van, T. Bayesian occupancy monitoring for Annamite endemic biodiversity in central Vietnam. Biodivers Conserv 23, 1541–1550 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0685-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0685-7

Keywords

Navigation