Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can re-establishment of cattle grazing restore bryophyte diversity in abandoned mesic semi-natural grasslands?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes of agricultural practices have led to decline of semi-natural habitats sustained by traditional animal husbandry in many European regions. The abandonment of semi-natural pastures leads to increase of vascular plant biomass and subsequent decline of weak competitors such as bryophytes. Re-establishing traditional animal husbandry may potentially restore biodiversity but the success of such measures remains insufficiently known. In this study, we asked if re-establishing cattle grazing on previously abandoned grasslands will restore their bryophyte communities. The effect of cattle grazing on bryophyte communities of mesic semi-natural grasslands was studied in south-western Finland in a comparison of (i) continuously grazed pastures, (ii) previously abandoned pastures where grazing was re-established during 1990s, and (iii) abandoned pastures, where grazing had ceased during late 1960s to early 1980s. The average cover, species richness, species density and species diversity of bryophytes were significantly higher in the continuously grazed than in the abandoned grasslands. Ordination analyses revealed clear differences also in community structure between the management classes. Re-established grasslands were ecologically heterogeneous and situated in between the continuously grazed and abandoned grasslands in all characteristics, indicating variable effect of the restoration measure. Seventeen bryophyte species were recognized as significant indicators of the three grassland classes, four of which could be used as indicators of valuable grassland habitats. Although there was variation in the consequences of re-introduction of grazing, the results give evidence of positive effect of grazing on regaining bryophyte diversity of abandoned grasslands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aartolahti T (1975) The morphology and development of the river valleys in southwestern Finland. Ann Acad Sci Fenn A 116:1–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Aude E, Ejrnæs R (2005) Bryophyte colonization in experimental microcosms: the role of nutrients, defoliation and vascular vegetation. Oikos 109:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergamini A, Peintinger M, Schmid B, Urmi E (2001) Effects of management and altitude on bryophyte diversity and composition in montane calcareous fens. Flora 196:180–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbink R, Willems JH (1993) Restoration management of abandoned chalk grassland in The Netherlands. Biodivers Conserv 2:612–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • During HJ (1979) Life strategies of bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia 5:2–18

    Google Scholar 

  • During HJ (2001) Diaspore banks. Bryologist 104:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • During HJ, Willems JH (2003) The impoverishment of the bryophyte and lichen flora of the Dutch chalk grasslands in the thirty years. Biol Conserv 36:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • During HJ, Brugues M, Cros RM, Lloret F (1987) The diaspore bank of bryophytes and ferns in the soil in some contrasting habitats around Barcelona, Spain. Lindbergia 13:137–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Duprè C, Stevens CJ, Ranke T, Bleeker A, Peppler C, Bach L, Gowing DJG, Dise NB, Dorlan E, Bobbink R, Diekmann M (2010) Changes in species richness and composition in European acidic grasslands over the past 70 years: the contribution of cumulative atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Glob Change Biol 16:344–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European commission (2009) Report from the commission to the council and the European parliament. Composite report on the conservation status of habitat types and species as required under article 17 of the habitats directive. KOM (2009) 358 final. Bryssel 13.7.2009

  • Grönroos J, Hietala-Koivu R, Kuussaari M, Laitinen P, Lankoski J, Lemola R, Perälä P, Puustinen M, Schulman A, Salo T, Siimes K, Turtola E (2007) Analysis on the Finnish agri-environmental programme 2006–2007. Finn Environ 19(2007):1–168 (in Finnish with an English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Güsewell S, Buttler A, Klötzli F (2009) Short-term and long-term effects of mowing on the vegetation of two calcareous fens. J Veg Sci 9:861–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoste-Danyłow A, Romanowski J, Żmihorski M (2010) Effects of management on invertebrates and birds in extensively used grassland of Poland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikonen I, Kauppi J, Lammi A, Lehtomaa L, Seppälä H (2001) Plans for the biotope management in the Rekijoki river valley area. Reg Environ Publ 231:1–175 (in Finnish with an English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingerpuu N, Kull K, Vellak K (1998) Bryophyte vegetation in a wooded meadow: relationships with phanerogam diversity and responses to fertilization. Plant Ecol 134:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahmen S, Poschold P (2008) Effects of grassland management on plant functional trait composition. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keizer PJ, van Tooren BF, During HJ (1985) Effects of bryophytes on seedling emergence and establishment of short-lived forbs in chalk grassland. J Ecol 73:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontula T, Lehtomaa L, Pykälä J (2000) Land-use history, vegetation and flora in Rekijoki valley, Somero, SW Finland. Finn Environ 306:1–91 (in Finnish with an English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002) Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity. Biol Conserv 106:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer R, Kaufmann R, Vorhauser K, Erschbamer B (2009) Effects of grazing exclusion on species composition in high-altitude grasslands of the Central Alps. Basic Appl Ecol 10:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 5.0. MjM Software, Gleneden beach

  • Peintinger M, Bergamini A (2006) Community structure and diversity of bryophytes and vascular plants in abandoned fen meadows. Plant Ecol 185:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piessens K, Stieperaere H, Honnay O, Hermy M (2008) Effects of management and adjacent forest on the heathland bryophyte layer. Basic Appl Ecol 9:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plassmann K, Edward-Jones G, Jones MLM (2009) The effects of low levels of nitrogen deposition and grazing on dune grassland. Sci Total Environ 407:1391–1404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poschold P, WallisDeVries MF (2002) The historical and socioeconomical perspective of calcareous grasslands—lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol Conserv 104:361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston CD, Hill MO, Pilkington S, Pywell RJ (2009) The effect of disturbance on the bryophyte flora of Salisbury Plain, western Europe’s largest chalk grassland. J Bryol 31:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykälä J (2003) Effects of restoration with cattle grazing on plant species composition and richness of semi-natural grasslands. Biodivers Conserv 12:2211–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykälä J (2005) Plant species responses to cattle grazing in mesic semi-natural grassland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pärtel M, Zobel M, Zobel K, van der Maarel E (1996) The species pool and its relation to species richness: evidence from Estonian plant communities. Oikos 75:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassi P, Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I (eds) (2010) The 2010 Red List of Finnish Species. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid AM, Hochuli DF (2007) Grassland invertebrate assemblages in managed landscapes: effect of host plant and microhabitat architecture. Austral Ecol 32:708–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS for windows, Rel. 17.0 (2008). SPSS Inc, Chicago

  • Stevens CJ, Duprè C, Dorland E, Gaudnik C, Gowing DJG, Bleeker A, Diekmann M, Alard D, Bobbink R, Fowler D, Corcket E, Mountford JO, Vandvik V, Aarrestad PA, Muller S, Dise NB (2010) Nitrogen deposition threatens species richness of grasslands across Europe. Environ Pollut 158:2940–2945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GB, Pullin AS (2008) The relative importance of grazing stock type and grazing intensity for conservation of mesotrophic ‘old meadow’ pasture. J Nat Conserv 16:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syrjänen K (2002) Kulttuuriympäristöt. Finn Environ 560:80–83 (in Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström S, Pärt T, Linnarsson E (2001) Grazing effects on between-year variation of farmland bird communities. J Appl Ecol 11:1141–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto H (2010) A consistent terminology for quantifying species diversity? Yes, it does exist. Oecologia 164:853–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ulvinen T, Syrjänen K (2009) A check list of the Finnish bryophytes. In: Laaka-Lindberg S, Anttila S, Syrjänen K (eds) Threatened bryophytes in Finland. Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy, Sastamala, pp 309–342 (in Finnish with an English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vainio M, Kekäläinen H, Alanen A, Pykälä J (2001) Traditional rural biotopes in Finland. Final report of the nationwide inventory. Finn Environ 527:1–163 (in Finnish with an English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderpoorten A, Delescaille L-M, Jacquemart A-L (2004) The bryophyte layer in a calcareous grassland after a decade of contrasting mowing regimes. Biol Conserv 117:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tooren BF, Odè B, During HJ, Bobbink R (1990) Regeneration of species richness in the bryophyte layer of Dutch chalk grasslands. Lindbergia 16:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessby K, Söderström B, Glimskär A, Svensson B (2002) Species-richness correlations of six different taxa in Swedish seminatural grasslands. Conserv Biol 16:430–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen R, Johnston AE, Crawley MJ, Edwards GR (2000) Bryophyte biomass and species richness on the Park Grass Experiment, Rothamsted, UK. Plant Ecol 151:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries MF, Poschold P, Willems JH (2002) Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna. Biol Conserv 104:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems JH, Bik LPM (1998) Restoration of high species density in calcareous grassland: the role of seed rain and soil seed bank. Appl Veg Sci 1:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation for financial support and Hanna Kondelin, Raimo Heikkilä, Heikki Simola and Juha Pykälä for help in different phases of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuomo Takala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takala, T., Tahvanainen, T. & Kouki, J. Can re-establishment of cattle grazing restore bryophyte diversity in abandoned mesic semi-natural grasslands?. Biodivers Conserv 21, 981–992 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0234-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0234-1

Keywords

Navigation